Literature DB >> 27496299

Improving Outcomes of Bulbomembranous Urethroplasty for Radiation-induced Urethral Strictures in Post-Urolume Era.

Joceline S Fuchs1, Matthias D Hofer1, Kunj R Sheth1, Billy H Cordon1, Jeremy M Scott1, Allen F Morey2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate contemporary outcomes of excision and primary anastomosis (EPA) for the treatment of radiation-induced urethral strictures (RUS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 72 patients undergoing EPA for RUS from 2007 to 2015 by a single surgeon was performed. We analyzed overall and long-term success rates of EPA urethroplasty and compared patient cohorts from two groups, 2007-2012 vs 2013-2015 (post-Urolume).
RESULTS: During the course of the study, we noted a near doubling of patient volume from the earlier (6.2 patients/year) to later (11.7 patients/year) cohorts. Among the 37 men treated from 2007 to 2012, we identified an EPA success rate of 70% compared with the improved 86% success rate in the subsequent cohort of 35 men treated from 2013 to 2015 (P = .07). Single dilation was successful in 50% of initial and 40% of subsequent cohort patients in the treatment of recurrence. Initial and subsequent cohorts varied only in regard to stricture length (mean 2.0 cm vs 3.0 cm in initial and subsequent cohorts, P = .001) and number treated with Urolume stent (initial 5 vs none in the later cohort, P = .03). Length of follow-up (median 50 [17-97] months for the initial and 22 [6-34] months for the later cohort) was not associated with recurrence.
CONCLUSION: Increasing numbers of RUS patients are presenting for urethral reconstruction in the post-Urolume era. With increasing experience, we improved success rates of EPA urethroplasty to over 85% despite increased stricture length.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27496299     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.07.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  6 in total

1.  Age ≤40 is an independent predictor of anastomotic urethroplasty and successful repair of bulbar urethral strictures.

Authors:  Michael T Davenport; Jeffrey T Wooliscroft; Maxim J McKibben; Nabeel Shakir; Joceline S Fuchs; Yooni A Yi; Boyd R Viers; Rachel L Bergeson; Ellen E Ward; Allen F Morey
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-02

2.  A multi-institutional critical assessment of dorsal onlay urethroplasty for post-radiation urethral stenosis.

Authors:  Connor G Policastro; Jay Simhan; Francisco E Martins; Nicolaas Lumen; Krishnan Venkatesan; Javier C Angulo; Shubham Gupta; Paul Rusilko; Erick Alejandro Ramírez Pérez; Kirk Redger; Brian J Flynn; Michael Hughes; Stephen Blakely; Dmitriy Nikolavsky
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.661

Review 3.  Management of bladder neck stenosis and urethral stricture and stenosis following treatment for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Helen L Nicholson; Yasser Al-Hakeem; Javier J Maldonado; Vincent Tse
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-07

Review 4.  Anatomy and techniques in posterior urethroplasty.

Authors:  Reynaldo G Gomez; Kyle Scarberry
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-08

Review 5.  Posterior urethral stenosis after prostate cancer treatment: contemporary options for definitive management.

Authors:  Arman A Kahokehr; Andrew C Peterson; Aaron C Lentz
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-08

Review 6.  Urological complications after radiation therapy-nothing ventured, nothing gained: a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Joanna Chorbińska; Wojciech Krajewski; Romuald Zdrojowy
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.