Literature DB >> 27495945

Bone shape difference between control and osteochondral defect groups of the ankle joint.

N Tümer1, L Blankevoort2, M van de Giessen3, M P Terra4, P A de Jong5, H Weinans6, G J M Tuijthof7, A A Zadpoor8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The etiology of osteochondral defects (OCDs), for which the ankle (talocrural) joint is one of the common sites, is not yet fully understood. In this study, we hypothesized that bone shape plays a role in development of OCDs. Therefore, we quantitatively compared the morphology of the talus and the distal tibia between an OCD group and a control group.
METHODS: The shape variations of the talus and distal tibia were described separately by constructing two statistical shape models (SSMs) based on the segmentation of the bones from ankle computed tomography (CT) scans obtained from control (i.e., 35 CT scans) and OCD (i.e., 37 CT scans) groups. The first five modes of shape variation for the SSM corresponding to each bone were statistically compared between control and OCD groups using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) corrected with the Bonferroni for multiple comparisons.
RESULTS: The first five modes of variation in the SSMs respectively represented 49% and 40% of the total variance of talus and tibia. Less than 5% of the variance per mode was described by the higher modes. Mode 5 of the talus (P = 0.004) primarily describing changes in the vertical neck angle and Mode 1 of the tibia (P < 0.0001) representing variations at the medial malleolus, showed statistically significant difference between the control and OCD groups.
CONCLUSION: Shape differences exist between control and OCD groups. This indicates that a geometry modulated biomechanical behavior of the talocrural joint may be a risk factor for OCD.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  (Osteo)chondral defect; Ankle; Statistical shape model; Talocrural joint; Talus; Tibia

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27495945     DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.07.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  6 in total

1.  Subject-Specific Axes of Rotation Based on Talar Morphology Do Not Improve Predictions of Tibiotalar and Subtalar Joint Kinematics.

Authors:  Jennifer A Nichols; Koren E Roach; Niccolo M Fiorentino; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  A risk assessment model for chronic ankle instability: indications for early surgical treatment? An observational prospective cohort - study protocol.

Authors:  Gwendolyn Vuurberg; Lauren M Wink; Leendert Blankevoort; Daniel Haverkamp; Robert Hemke; Sjoerd Jens; Inger N Sierevelt; Mario Maas; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Three-dimensional analysis of shape variations and symmetry of the fibula, tibia, calcaneus and talus.

Authors:  Nazlı Tümer; Vahid Arbabi; Willem Paul Gielis; Pim A de Jong; Harrie Weinans; Gabrielle J M Tuijthof; Amir A Zadpoor
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2018-11-04       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Typical Shape Differences in the Subtalar Joint Bones Between Subjects with Chronic Ankle Instability and Controls.

Authors:  Nazlı Tümer; Gwendolyn Vuurberg; Leendert Blankevoort; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs; Gabrielle J M Tuijthof; Amir A Zadpoor
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-05-26       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Translation of 3D Anatomy to 2D Radiographic Angle Measurements in the Ankle Joint: Validity and Reliability.

Authors:  Gwendolyn Vuurberg; Nazli Tümer; Inger Sierevelt; Johannes G G Dobbe; Robert Hemke; Jan Joost Wiegerinck; Mario Maas; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs; Gabriëlle J M Tuijthof
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2022-07-21

6.  Three-Dimensional Registration of Freehand-Tracked Ultrasound to CT Images of the Talocrural Joint.

Authors:  Nazlı Tümer; Aimee C Kok; Frans M Vos; Geert J Streekstra; Christian Askeland; Gabrielle J M Tuijthof; Amir A Zadpoor
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 3.576

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.