Literature DB >> 27495792

Clevidipine-induced Dyspnea Relief in Acute Heart Failure Patients.

Nicoleta Stoicea1, Nicholas Joseph2, Sergio D Bergese3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27495792      PMCID: PMC5006690          DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EBioMedicine        ISSN: 2352-3964            Impact factor:   8.143


× No keyword cloud information.
Recently, EBioMedicine published a study proposing that clevidipine's complex mechanism of action might be responsible for relieving dyspnea in acute heart failure (AHF) patients Dahl et al. (2016). Clevidipine was approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (2008) as a third generation dihydropyridine (DHP) calcium channel blocker for the management of perioperative acute hypertension (Merry et al., 2014, Powroznyk et al., 2000, Aronson et al., 2008, Levy et al., 2007; ). In 2014, Peacock et al. published the results of a randomized, open-label active control study (PRONTO) evaluating the efficacy of clevidipine versus standard of care (SOC) anti-hypertensive therapy and concluded that clevidipine was responsible for a rapid reduction in blood pressure and dyspnea improvement in hypertensive AHF patients (Peacock et al., 2010). Calcium influx during depolarization in vascular smooth muscle (VSM) is prevented by clevidipine administration, blocking intracellular phosphodiesterase with an increase in guanosine monophosphate. This mechanism is responsible for an inhibition in VSM contractility associated with cardiopulmonary and systemic vasodilation (Murphy and Brower, 2011). A reverse translational medicine approach was used by Dahl et al. (2016) in order to test the idea that, in human lungs, a unique combination of Cav1.2 splice variants is expressed with a higher affinity for clevidipine than the same splice variant in other tissue. The authors refine the general understanding of how pannexin-1 (Panx1), known to act as a major adenosine triphosphate (ATP) release channel, affects Cav1.2 pharmacology and increases its affinity for clevidipine. Further research was encouraged in order to clarify the role of splice variants to the pathophysiology of AHF in the light of a new paradigm generated by Panx1/Cav1.2 interaction (Dahl et al., 2016). Dahl et al. (2016) acknowledged the extended body of research conducted over the last 18 years since clevidipine was approved as an investigational new drug, and its importance in gaining a better understanding of its mechanism of action (Dahl et al., 2016). Their work focused on testing the hypothesis that specific CACNA1C splice variants are encoding for Cav1.2 in lung tissue with a different pharmacological profile for clevidipine when compared to the same variants expressed in other tissues. They also considered the hypothesis that clevidipine-induced dyspnea relief is due to clevidipine acting on Panx1 channels in lung tissue. The authors considered the possibility that Panx1 associates with Cav1.2 in lung tissue, resulting in an increased affinity of Cav1.2 for clevidipine (Dahl et al., 2016). Human lung tissue from eight donors “without overt disease, but unsuitable for transplant” was provide by the Life Alliance Organ Recovery Agency. cDNA was obtained from human lung parenchyma and used to amplify regions of CACNA1C known to present splicing variation. Eight splice variant combinations of CACNA1C exons found in human lung tissue were tested. The effect of DHP nicardipine on different Cav1.2 splice variants was tested as well. The authors concluded that Cav1.2 splice variants with different affinities for clevidipine are identified in lung tissue and the higher affinity variants also present a selectively higher affinity for different DHPs (Dahl et al., 2016). The experiment found no direct effect of clevidipine on Panx1 channels, known to mediate muscle relaxation and contraction in VSM. However, the coexpression of Panx1 with the high affinity Cav1.2 splice variants showed a significant reactivity to lower clevidipine - but not nicardipine – concentrations. The authors acknowledged the importance of previous research in identifying the Cav1.2 splice variants altering DHP sensitivity (Dahl et al., 2016). They established that “different splice variants of Cav1.2 confer differences in the specificity of different DHPs”. Further research should clarify the coexpression of Panx1/Cav1.2. Although some technical aspects are questioned, such as the presence of mixed tissue in harvested donor lungs (lung parenchyma, arterioles, venules) influencing the expression pattern of the splice variants, new insights were provided in response to previously unexplained clinical observations. An extensive body of scientific evidence supports the fact that clevidipine is a superior drug for treatment of acute hypertension, providing a rapid blood pressure adjustment in the surgical and critical care setting, as demonstrated by the ECLIPSE Trials (2008) (Aronson et al., 2008). The article published by Dahl et al. (2016) represents further progress into elucidating clevidipine's effects on dyspnea in hypertensive AHF patients, prompted by the well-known PRONTO pilot study.

Disclosure

The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
  5 in total

1.  The ECLIPSE trials: comparative studies of clevidipine to nitroglycerin, sodium nitroprusside, and nicardipine for acute hypertension treatment in cardiac surgery patients.

Authors:  Solomon Aronson; Cornelius M Dyke; Kevin A Stierer; Jerrold H Levy; Albert T Cheung; Philip D Lumb; Dean J Kereiakes; Mark F Newman
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Clevidipine for severe hypertension in acute heart failure: a VELOCITY trial analysis.

Authors:  Frank W Peacock; Joseph Varon; Ramin Ebrahimi; Lala Dunbar; Charles V Pollack
Journal:  Congest Heart Fail       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr

3.  Clevidipine effectively and rapidly controls blood pressure preoperatively in cardiac surgery patients: the results of the randomized, placebo-controlled efficacy study of clevidipine assessing its preoperative antihypertensive effect in cardiac surgery-1.

Authors:  Jerrold H Levy; Miguel Y Mancao; Richard Gitter; Dean J Kereiakes; Alina M Grigore; Solomon Aronson; Mark F Newman
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Clevidipine compared with nitroglycerin for blood pressure control in coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized double-blind study.

Authors:  Alan F Merry; Edwin G Avery; Nancy A Nussmeier; Hugh R Playford; Guy R Warman; Yamei Wang; Robert N Sladen
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  High affinity complexes of pannexin channels and L-type calcium channel splice-variants in human lung: Possible role in clevidipine-induced dyspnea relief in acute heart failure.

Authors:  Gerhard P Dahl; Gregory E Conner; Feng Qiu; Junjie Wang; Edward Spindler; Jason A Campagna; H Peter Larsson
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 8.143

  5 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  The Current Role of Clevidipine in the Management of Hypertension.

Authors:  Bo Xu; Zhen Chen; Gaorui Tang
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 3.571

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.