Literature DB >> 27495187

Intraindividual Analysis of Signal Intensity Changes in the Dentate Nucleus After Consecutive Serial Applications of Linear and Macrocyclic Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents.

Alexander Radbruch1, Lukas D Weberling, Pascal J Kieslich, Johanna Hepp, Philipp Kickingereder, Wolfgang Wick, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, Martin Bendszus.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recent studies reported an increase in the dentate nucleus (DN)-to-pons signal intensity (SI) ratio (DN-pons SI ratio) on unenhanced T1-weighted images in patients who received consecutive serial injections of linear gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs). In contrast, most studies found no increase in the DN-pons SI ratio when patients were treated with consecutive serial injections of macrocyclic GBCAs. However, the potential difference between macrocyclic and linear GBCAs has never been assessed in individuals who received subsequent applications of both contrast agents. In this retrospective study, we assessed the evolution of the DN-pons SI ratio change in patients that were treated with a comparable number of serial consecutive injections of the linear GBCA gadopentetate dimeglumine and subsequent serial injections of the macrocyclic GBCAs gadobutrol and gadoterate meglumine.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of 36 patients was analyzed. All patients underwent at least 5 consecutive administrations of the linear GBCA gadopentetate dimeglumine followed by an equal number of consecutive administrations of the macrocyclic GBCA gadobutrol. In 12 of the 36 patients, 5 or more final consecutive injections of the macrocyclic GBCA gadoterate meglumine were analyzed additionally. The difference of DN-pons SI ratios on unenhanced T1-weighted images was calculated by subtracting the ratio at the first examination from the ratio at the last examination in each of the 3 periods.
RESULTS: The mean DN-pons SI ratio difference in the gadopentetate dimeglumine period was significantly greater than 0 (mean ± SD, 0.0448 ± 0.0345; P < 0.001), whereas the mean DN-pons SI ratio difference in the subsequent gadobutrol and gadoterate meglumine period was significantly smaller than 0 (gadobutrol: -0.0178 ± 0.0459, P = 0.026; gadoterate meglumine: -0.0250 ± 0.0284, P = 0.011).
CONCLUSIONS: In this observational study, the application of the linear GBCA gadopentetate dimeglumine was associated with a DN-pons SI ratio increase, whereas subsequent applications of the macrocyclic GBCAs gadobutrol or gadoterate meglumine in the same patients were not. Rather, the current data tentatively suggest a decrease in preexisting hyperintensities over time when linear GBCAs are changed to macrocyclic GBCAs, potentially indicating a washout effect or precipitation of gadolinium. Future patient studies need to include control groups to replicate the present results, and additional animal studies should be conducted to clarify the underlying mechanism of the proposed SI decrease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27495187     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  30 in total

1.  Effects of serial macrocyclic-based contrast materials gadoterate meglumine and gadobutrol administrations on gadolinium-related dentate nuclei signal increases in unenhanced T1-weighted brain: a retrospective study in 158 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.

Authors:  Alessandra Splendiani; Marco Perri; Claudia Marsecano; Valentina Vellucci; Giulia Michelini; Antonio Barile; Ernesto Di Cesare
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 2.  Distribution and chemical forms of gadolinium in the brain: a review.

Authors:  Tomonori Kanda; Yudai Nakai; Akifumi Hagiwara; Hiroshi Oba; Keiko Toyoda; Shigeru Furui
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Gadolinium retention in the body: what we know and what we can do.

Authors:  Enrico Tedeschi; Ferdinando Caranci; Flavio Giordano; Valentina Angelini; Sirio Cocozza; Arturo Brunetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  Standardized assessment of the signal intensity increase on unenhanced T1-weighted images in the brain: the European Gadolinium Retention Evaluation Consortium (GREC) Task Force position statement.

Authors:  Carlo C Quattrocchi; Joana Ramalho; Aart J van der Molen; Àlex Rovira; Alexander Radbruch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  A Review of the Current Evidence on Gadolinium Deposition in the Brain.

Authors:  Richard Pullicino; Mark Radon; Shubhabrata Biswas; Maneesh Bhojak; Kumar Das
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.649

Review 6.  Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent-Related Toxicities.

Authors:  Luca Pasquini; Antonio Napolitano; Emiliano Visconti; Daniela Longo; Andrea Romano; Paolo Tomà; Maria Camilla Rossi Espagnet
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.749

7.  A Class of FeIII Macrocyclic Complexes with Alcohol Donor Groups as Effective T1 MRI Contrast Agents.

Authors:  Eric M Snyder; Didar Asik; Samira M Abozeid; Ariel Burgio; Gage Bateman; Steven G Turowski; Joseph A Spernyak; Janet R Morrow
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 8.  Gadolinium-based contrast agents in children.

Authors:  Michael N Rozenfeld; Daniel J Podberesky
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-08-04

9.  Dentate nucleus T1 hyperintensity: is it always gadolinium all that glitters?

Authors:  Luca Pasquini; Maria Camilla Rossi Espagnet; Antonio Napolitano; Daniela Longo; Alice Bertaina; Emiliano Visconti; Paolo Tomà
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis Risk Assessment and Skin Biopsy Quantification in Patients with Renal Disease following Gadobenate Contrast Administration.

Authors:  E Kanal; T J Patton; I Krefting; C Wang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.