John L Pearce1, Lance A Waller2, Stefanie E Sarnat3, Howard H Chang2, Mitch Klein3, James A Mulholland4, Paige E Tolbert3. 1. Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Cannon Street, Charleston, SC 29422, United States. Electronic address: pearcejo@musc.edu. 2. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States. 3. Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States. 4. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Exposure metrics that identify spatial contrasts in multipollutant air quality are needed to better understand multipollutant geographies and health effects from air pollution. Our aim is to improve understanding of: (1) long-term spatial distributions of multiple pollutants; and (2) demographic characteristics of populations residing within areas of differing air quality. METHODS: We obtained average concentrations for ten air pollutants (p=10) across a 12 km grid (n=253) covering Atlanta, Georgia for 2002-2008. We apply a self-organizing map (SOM) to our data to derive multipollutant patterns observed across our grid and classify locations under their most similar pattern (i.e, multipollutant spatial type (MST)). Finally, we geographically map classifications to delineate regions of similar multipollutant characteristics and characterize associated demographics. RESULTS: We found six MSTs well describe our data, with profiles highlighting a range of combinations, from locations experiencing generally clean air to locations experiencing conditions that were relatively dirty. Mapping MSTs highlighted that downtown areas were dominated by primary pollution and that suburban areas experienced relatively higher levels of secondary pollution. Demographics show the largest proportion of the overall population resided in downtown locations experiencing higher levels of primary pollution. Moreover, higher proportions of nonwhites and children in poverty reside in these areas when compared to suburban populations that resided in areas exhibiting relatively lower pollution. CONCLUSION: Our approach reveals the nature and spatial distribution of differential pollutant combinations across urban environments and provides helpful insights for identifying spatial exposure and demographic contrasts for future health studies.
BACKGROUND: Exposure metrics that identify spatial contrasts in multipollutant air quality are needed to better understand multipollutant geographies and health effects from air pollution. Our aim is to improve understanding of: (1) long-term spatial distributions of multiple pollutants; and (2) demographic characteristics of populations residing within areas of differing air quality. METHODS: We obtained average concentrations for ten air pollutants (p=10) across a 12 km grid (n=253) covering Atlanta, Georgia for 2002-2008. We apply a self-organizing map (SOM) to our data to derive multipollutant patterns observed across our grid and classify locations under their most similar pattern (i.e, multipollutant spatial type (MST)). Finally, we geographically map classifications to delineate regions of similar multipollutant characteristics and characterize associated demographics. RESULTS: We found six MSTs well describe our data, with profiles highlighting a range of combinations, from locations experiencing generally clean air to locations experiencing conditions that were relatively dirty. Mapping MSTs highlighted that downtown areas were dominated by primary pollution and that suburban areas experienced relatively higher levels of secondary pollution. Demographics show the largest proportion of the overall population resided in downtown locations experiencing higher levels of primary pollution. Moreover, higher proportions of nonwhites and children in poverty reside in these areas when compared to suburban populations that resided in areas exhibiting relatively lower pollution. CONCLUSION: Our approach reveals the nature and spatial distribution of differential pollutant combinations across urban environments and provides helpful insights for identifying spatial exposure and demographic contrasts for future health studies.
Authors: Erin A Riley; Lyndsey Banks; Jonathan Fintzi; Timothy R Gould; Kris Hartin; LaNae Schaal; Mark Davey; Lianne Sheppard; Timothy Larson; Michael G Yost; Christopher D Simpson Journal: Atmos Environ (1994) Date: 2014-12-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Michael Jerrett; Richard T Burnett; Bernardo S Beckerman; Michelle C Turner; Daniel Krewski; George Thurston; Randall V Martin; Aaron van Donkelaar; Edward Hughes; Yuanli Shi; Susan M Gapstur; Michael J Thun; C Arden Pope Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2013-09-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Brooke A Alhanti; Howard H Chang; Andrea Winquist; James A Mulholland; Lyndsey A Darrow; Stefanie Ebelt Sarnat Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2015-09-09 Impact factor: 5.563
Authors: C Arden Pope; Richard T Burnett; George D Thurston; Michael J Thun; Eugenia E Calle; Daniel Krewski; John J Godleski Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-12-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jennifer F Bobb; Linda Valeri; Birgit Claus Henn; David C Christiani; Robert O Wright; Maitreyi Mazumdar; John J Godleski; Brent A Coull Journal: Biostatistics Date: 2014-12-22 Impact factor: 5.279
Authors: John L Pearce; Lance A Waller; James A Mulholland; Stefanie E Sarnat; Matthew J Strickland; Howard H Chang; Paige E Tolbert Journal: Environ Health Date: 2015-06-23 Impact factor: 5.984
Authors: Gerard Hoek; Ranjini M Krishnan; Rob Beelen; Annette Peters; Bart Ostro; Bert Brunekreef; Joel D Kaufman Journal: Environ Health Date: 2013-05-28 Impact factor: 5.984
Authors: John L Pearce; Lance A Waller; Howard H Chang; Mitch Klein; James A Mulholland; Jeremy A Sarnat; Stefanie E Sarnat; Matthew J Strickland; Paige E Tolbert Journal: Environ Health Date: 2014-07-03 Impact factor: 5.984
Authors: Brian J Reich; Yawen Guan; Denis Fourches; Joshua L Warren; Stefanie E Sarnat; Howard H Chang Journal: Ann Appl Stat Date: 2020-12-19 Impact factor: 2.083
Authors: Kathie L Dionisio; Christopher G Nolte; Tanya L Spero; Stephen Graham; Nina Caraway; Kristen M Foley; Kristin K Isaacs Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 5.563
Authors: Grace M Christensen; Zhenjiang Li; John Pearce; Michele Marcus; James J Lah; Lance A Waller; Stefanie Ebelt; Anke Hüls Journal: Environ Int Date: 2022-07-16 Impact factor: 13.352