Yuichi Mori1, Shin-Ei Kudo1, Philip Wai Yan Chiu2, Rajvinder Singh3, Masashi Misawa1, Kunihiko Wakamura1, Toyoki Kudo1, Takemasa Hayashi1, Atsushi Katagiri1, Hideyuki Miyachi1, Fumio Ishida1, Yasuharu Maeda1, Haruhiro Inoue4, Yukitaka Nimura5, Masahiro Oda6, Kensaku Mori7.
Abstract
Background and study aims: Optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps is expected to improve the cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy, but achieving a high accuracy is difficult for trainees. Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) is therefore receiving attention as an attractive tool. This study aimed to validate the efficacy of the latest CAD model for endocytoscopy (380-fold ultra-magnifying endoscopy). Patients and methods: This international web-based trial was conducted between August and November 2015. A web-based test comprising one white-light and one endocytoscopic image of 205 small colorectal polyps (≤ 10 mm) from 123 patients was undertaken by both CAD and by endoscopists (three experts and ten non-experts from three countries). Outcome measures were accuracy in identifying neoplastic change in diminutive (≤ 5 mm) and small (≤ 10 mm) polyps, and accuracy in predicting post-polypectomy surveillance intervals according to current guidelines for high confidence optical diagnoses of diminutive polyps.
Results: Of the 205 small polyps (147 neoplastic and 58 non-neoplastic), 139 were diminutive. CAD was accurate for 89 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 83 % - 94 %) of diminutive polyps and 89 % (84 % - 93 %) of small polyps, which was significantly greater than results for the non-experts (73 % [71 % - 76 %], P < 0.001; and 76 % [74 % - 78 %], P < 0.001, respectively) and comparable with the experts' results (90 % [87 % - 93 %], P = 0.703; and 91 % [89 % - 93 %], P = 0.106, respectively). The surveillance interval predicted by CAD provided 98 % (93 % - 100 %) and 96 % (91 % - 99 %) agreement with pathology-directed intervals of the European and American guidelines, respectively. Conclusions: The use of CAD in endocytoscopy can be effective in the management of diminutive/small colorectal polyps.UMIN Clinical Trial Registry: UMIN000018185. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Background and study aims: Optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps is expected to improve the cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy, but achieving a high accuracy is difficult for trainees. Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) is therefore receiving attention as an attractive tool. This study aimed to validate the efficacy of the latest CAD model for endocytoscopy (380-fold ultra-magnifying endoscopy). Patients and methods: This international web-based trial was conducted between August and November 2015. A web-based test comprising one white-light and one endocytoscopic image of 205 small colorectal polyps (≤ 10 mm) from 123 patients was undertaken by both CAD and by endoscopists (three experts and ten non-experts from three countries). Outcome measures were accuracy in identifying neoplastic change in diminutive (≤ 5 mm) and small (≤ 10 mm) polyps, and accuracy in predicting post-polypectomy surveillance intervals according to current guidelines for high confidence optical diagnoses of diminutive polyps.
Results: Of the 205 small polyps (147 neoplastic and 58 non-neoplastic), 139 were diminutive. CAD was accurate for 89 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 83 % - 94 %) of diminutive polyps and 89 % (84 % - 93 %) of small polyps, which was significantly greater than results for the non-experts (73 % [71 % - 76 %], P < 0.001; and 76 % [74 % - 78 %], P < 0.001, respectively) and comparable with the experts' results (90 % [87 % - 93 %], P = 0.703; and 91 % [89 % - 93 %], P = 0.106, respectively). The surveillance interval predicted by CAD provided 98 % (93 % - 100 %) and 96 % (91 % - 99 %) agreement with pathology-directed intervals of the European and American guidelines, respectively. Conclusions: The use of CAD in endocytoscopy can be effective in the management of diminutive/small colorectal polyps.UMIN Clinical Trial Registry: UMIN000018185. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016
PMID: 27494455 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-113609
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Endoscopy ISSN: 0013-726X Impact factor: 10.093