| Literature DB >> 27493993 |
Toshimori Sekine1, Norimasa Ozaki2, Kohei Miyanishi3, Yuto Asaumi3, Tomoaki Kimura4, Bruno Albertazzi3, Yuya Sato3, Youichi Sakawa5, Takayoshi Sano5, Seiji Sugita6, Takafumi Matsui7, Ryosuke Kodama2.
Abstract
Forsterite (Mg2SiO4) is one of the major planetary materials, and its behavior under extreme conditions is important to understand the interior structure of large planets, such as super-Earths, and large-scale planetary impact events. Previous shock compression measurements of forsterite indicate that it may melt below 200 GPa, but these measurements did not go beyond 200 GPa. We report the shock response of forsterite above ~250 GPa, obtained using the laser shock wave technique. We simultaneously measured the Hugoniot and temperature of shocked forsterite and interpreted the results to suggest the following: (i) incongruent crystallization of MgO at 271 to 285 GPa, (ii) phase transition of MgO at 285 to 344 GPa, and (iii) remelting above ~470 to 500 GPa. These exothermic and endothermic reactions are seen to occur under extreme conditions of pressure and temperature. They indicate complex structural and chemical changes in the system MgO-SiO2 at extreme pressures and temperatures and will affect the way we understand the interior processes of large rocky planets as well as material transformation by impacts in the formation of planetary systems.Entities:
Keywords: Forsterite; Hugoniot; MgO; incongruent crystallization; large rocky planets; laser shock compression; phase equilibria; phase transition; planetary impacts
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27493993 PMCID: PMC4972465 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1600157
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Adv ISSN: 2375-2548 Impact factor: 14.136
Fig. 1Laser shock experiment of shot 35286.
(A to C) Schematic experimental setup and typical measurements by a velocimeter [velocity interferometer system for any reflector (VISAR)] (B) and a pyrometer [streaked optical pyrometer (SOP)] (C). The driving laser was GEKKO XII (Osaka University). VISARs give direct measurements of shock velocities in forsterite and quartz under extreme conditions. The particle velocity in forsterite was calculated using the known shock velocity–particle velocity relation of quartz. This method provides a precise Hugoniot determination of forsterite. A single crystal of forsterite with a thickness of 20 or 50 μm was used as a sample. A typical equation-of-state (EOS) target assembly consisted of polypropylene (CH), aluminum (Al), crystalline α-quartz (SiO2), and forsterite (Mg2SiO4). The CH polymer with a thickness of 15 or 30 μm was used as an ablator to generate a shock wave and to minimize hard x-ray radiations in the laser-plasma interaction region. The aluminum (40 μm thick) and quartz (50 μm thick) were used as the reference materials for the impedance mismatching analysis. The brightness temperature was determined using the gray-body Planck spectrum observed by a calibrated pyrometer (SOP). For details, see the Supplementary Materials.
Shock compression data of single-crystal forsterite (initial density of 3.226 ± 0.004 g cm−3).
| 33552 | 14.00 ± 0.42 | 6.00 ± 0.39 | 271.0 ± 18.1 | 5.65 ± 0.40 | 7.12 ± 0.36 | 0.0145 ± 0.0023 |
| 35283 | 14.21 ± 0.27 | 6.22 ± 0.21 | 285.2 ± 10.3 | 5.74 ± 0.24 | 9.43 ± 0.68 | 0.0174 ± 0.0016 |
| 33676 | 15.70 ± 0.34 | 6.80 ± 0.23 | 344.3 ± 12.6 | 5.69 ± 0.24 | 8.44 ± 0.49 | 0.0527 ± 0.0050 |
| 37817 | 16.12 ± 0.17 | 7.90 ± 0.16 | 410.9 ± 8.5 | 6.33 ± 0.18 | 12.49 ± 0.46 | 0.0541 ± 0.0103 |
| 37779 | 16.54 ± 0.15 | 8.74 ± 0.20 | 466.3 ± 10.8 | 6.84 ± 0.24 | 13.88 ± 0.89 | 0.0987 ± 0.0153 |
| 37767 | 17.74 ± 0.20 | 9.21 ± 0.22 | 527.3 ± 12.9 | 6.71 ± 0.25 | 16.80 ± 0.64 | 0.1072 ± 0.0161 |
| 36755 | 17.96 ± 0.29 | 9.49 ± 0.30 | 549.7 ± 18.0 | 6.84 ± 0.36 | 20.63 ± 2.60 | 0.183 ± 0.0161 |
| 35314 | 19.99 ± 0.50 | 10.73 ± 0.37 | 692.0 ± 26.2 | 6.96 ± 0.48 | — | — |
| 35286 | 22.63 ± 0.19 | 13.35 ± 0.23 | 974.4 ± 17.5 | 7.87 ± 0.29 | 33.98 ± 5.48 | 0.213 ± 0.0324 |
Fig. 2Hugoniot relationships for forsterite single crystals.
(A) Shock velocity (Us) and particle velocity (up). (B) Pressure and density. Note the remarkable discontinuities around ~350 and ~450 GPa in (B) that correspond to particle velocities at up of ~7 and 9 km s−1 in (A), respectively. Experimental setup of target is illustrated in fig. S1, and experimental data are listed in Table 1. Three previous data sets from Jackson and Ahrens () (for red diamonds), Marsh () (for violet diamonds), and Mosenfelder et al. () (for brown diamonds) are compared. The dot dashed lines in (A) and (B) indicate the extended Hugoniot relations given by Us (km s−1) = 2.93 + 1.82 up (km s−1) applicable for a range of up of 4.1 to 6.9 km s−1, which is almost the same as the prediction by de Koker et al. ().
Fig. 3Phase diagram for MgO, Mg2SiO4 (Fo), and MgSiO3 (En).
The present data of pressure and temperature on Fo Hugoniot are shown by solid circles with error bars, and the wide gray curve illustrates a possible path along Fo Hugoniot based on the present study. Phase boundaries for the transition of B1 MgO and B2 MgO and for the liquidus and melting curves of compounds Fo, En, and MgO are illustrated together with linearly extended Hugoniots () of Fo represented by Fo melt (line 1), liquid MgSiO3 + B1 MgO (line 2), and postperovskite MgSiO3 + B1 MgO (line 3). Shock temperatures of Fo measured by Luo et al. () are shown in squares. Boundaries for B1-B2 transition (–, , ) and melting of MgO, solidus (, ) of MgSiO3, and demixing phase boundary () for MgSiO3 (liq) = MgO (solid) + SiO2 (liq) as MgSiO3 liquidus are illustrated for comparison.