Literature DB >> 27493974

Circulating Regulatory T-Cells in Monoclonal Gammopathies of Uncertain Significance and Multiple Myeloma: In Search of a Role.

Giovanni D'Arena1, Giovanni Rossi2, Luca Laurenti3, Teodora Statuto4, Fiorella D'Auria4, Luciana Valvano4, Vittorio Simeon5, Aldo Giudice6, Idanna Innocenti3, Vincenzo De Feo7, Rosanna Filosa8, Pellegrino Musto9.   

Abstract

The frequency and function of regulatory T-cells (Tregs) in multiple myeloma (MM) are still matter of debate. The percentage and absolute number of circulating Tregs (CD4(+)CD25(+high  density)CD127(-/low  density)) from 39 patients with untreated MM and 44 patients with monoclonal gammopathies of uncertain significance (MGUS) were tested and compared with 20 healthy subjects as controls. The mean percentage number of circulating Tregs was 2.1%  ± 1.0 (range 0.75-6.1%) in MM patients; 2.1%  ± 0.9 (range 0.3-4.4%) in MGUS; and 1.5%  ± 0.4 (range 0.9-2.1%) in controls (p ns). Mean absolute number of Tregs was 36.3/μL ± 23.7 (range 6.7-149/μL) in MM; 38.8/μL ± 19.1 (range 4.3-87/μL) in MGUS; and 39.4/μL ± 12.5 (range 18-63/μL) in controls (p ns). After a median follow-up of 38 months, 5 MGUS and 2 smoldering MM (SMM) transformed into overt MM; however Tregs number did not predict this evolution. With respect to MM patients and after a median follow-up of 33 months, Tregs did not show any significant correlation with main clinical and laboratory characteristics. Finally, from a functional point of view, Tregs displayed an effective suppressor function, irrespective of disease status. This study indicates that the number of circulating Tregs does not differ in different monoclonal gammopathies and normal subjects and do not correlate with clinical features of MM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27493974      PMCID: PMC4963581          DOI: 10.1155/2016/9271469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol Res        ISSN: 2314-7156            Impact factor:   4.818


1. Introduction

Natural and inducible regulatory T-cells (Tregs) are a small subset of T-lymphocytes able to suppress immune responses by direct interaction with other immune cell types or through immunosuppressive cytokines [1]. They appear to be crucial in maintaining immune homeostasis, mediating peripheral tolerance and preventing autoimmunity. Emerging evidences suggest that Tregs may also modulate host T-cell activity against tumor-associated antigens, thereby facilitating tumor escape from immunological control [2]. Tregs are characterized by the constitutive expression of surface CD4 antigen, high levels of surface CD25 antigen (IL-2 receptor α-chain), and the transcription factor forkhead box P3 (FOXP3), with low to nil CD127 (IL-7 receptor) [3]. We have recently demonstrated that Tregs may have a prognostic role in patients with Rai stage 0 chronic lymphocytic leukemia [4]. However, frequency and function of Tregs in monoclonal gammopathies of uncertain significance (MGUS) and multiple myeloma (MM) are still matter of debate. Aiming to evaluate a possible prognostic significance in MGUS and MM, we studied the percentage and absolute number of circulating Tregs in a consecutive, prospective cohort of these patients and in a group of healthy subjects, as controls.

2. Materials and Methods

Methylenediaminetetraacetic acid- (EDTA-) anticoagulated peripheral blood samples from 39 patients with newly diagnosed MM (mean age 69 years; range 37–90 years; 18 male; 21 female) and 44 patients with MGUS (mean age 65 years; range 39–87 years; 25 male; 19 female) were collected after informed written consent. Ten out of 39 MM patients were reclassified as having smoldering MM (SMM) just after the diagnosis. No relapsed, treated, or in remission phase after therapy patients were evaluated. Peripheral blood samples from 20 healthy subjects (mean age 59 years; range 32–80 years; 10 male; 10 female) were used as controls. Main patients' characteristics are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Main patients' characteristics at study entry.

MM (39 patients)MGUS (44 patients)
Age (years)
 (median; range)69 (37–90)65 (39–87)

Gender (number; %)
 Male18 (46%)25 (57%)
 Female21 (54%)19 (43%)

International staging system (ISS) (number; %)
 ISS-19 (23%)
 ISS-219 (49%)
 ISS-311 (28%)

MM/MGUS subtype (number; %)
 IgG28 (72%)32 (73%)
 IgA11 (28%)8 (18%)
 IgM4 (9%)

Serum M-protein (g/dL)
 (median; range)2.9 (2.1–5.3)1.1 (0.2–1.9)

Percentage of BM plasma cells
 (median; range)36 (23–85)7 (1–10)

BM: bone marrow; MM: multiple myeloma; MGUS: monoclonal gammopathies of uncertain significance.

Tregs were numbered by means of flow cytometry (FACSCanto II, Becton Dickinson Biosciences (BDB), San Jose, CA, USA) as follows: 100 μL of each of the following directly conjugated monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs): CD4-PerCP (peridinin chlorophyll protein complex)/CD127-PE (phycoerythrin)/CD25-Pe-Cy7 (PE-Cyanine 7)/CD45-APC-Cy/(allophycocyanin-Cy7). All MoAbs were purchased from BDB. After lysis of red blood cells and repeated washing, the samples were analyzed by flow cytometry, by acquiring a minimum of 20,000 events for each sample. All subsequent analyses were performed using FACS-Diva software (BDB). Tregs were evaluated according to the gating strategy protocol previously described (Figure 1) [12] and defined by the expression of CD4 and CD25 at high density and CD127 at low density or undetectable levels. This gating strategy was chosen because it better discriminates between Tregs and activated T-cells that normally upregulate CD25 antigen [3].
Figure 1

Flow cytometric analytical gating strategy. Tregs were evaluated, after selecting on gated CD45+ lymphocytes (P1), CD4+ cells (P2) as cells with CD25+ at high density and CD127 low density or undetectable levels (P3).

An in vitro proliferation inhibition assay, as previously described by Castella et al. [13], was used in 14 representative subjects (3 healthy controls and 4 MGUS, 3 SMM, and 4 active MM patients) to assess the suppressive function of circulating Tregs. Briefly, cell proliferation was evaluated measuring the uptake of 1 μCi 3HTdR, with a scintillation counter, by cell culture in which allogeneic PBMC were used as accessory cells, purified CD4+CD25+CD127low cells as Tregs, autologous CD4+CD25− cells as responder cells, and soluble anti-CD3 as polyclonal activator. Conventional CD4+CD25− T-cells (T-conv): Treg ratio was 1 : 1. The percentage of inhibition was calculated as follows: 1 − [(average cpm counts in T responders + Tregs wells)]/[(average cpm counts in T responders wells)] × 100.

2.1. Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables are reported as means, standard deviations, and range. Comparisons were performed by use of single t-test or ANOVA depending on the number of group compared. The degree of association between two variables was measured using Spearman rank correlation for nonparametric data to assure the pertinence of all variables. Progression-free survival (PFS) was measured from time of diagnosis to time of progression into overt MM for MGUS and SMM or after an effective first-line therapy in MM patients; overall survival (OS) was determined from time of diagnosis to death event. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze both PFS and OS. The receiver-operator-curve (ROC) analysis was performed to estimate cut-off of Tregs (as number or percentage) to predict progression or survival. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using R statistical software (version 3.2.0; R Foundation for Statistical Computing).

3. Results

Overall, the mean number of circulating Tregs, detected as percentage of all lymphocytes, was 2.1%  ± 1.0 (range 0.75–6.1%) in MM patients; 2.1%  ± 0.9 (range 0.3–4.4%) in MGUS; and 1.5%  ± 0.4 (range 0.9–2.1%) in controls (p ns) (Figure 2). Mean absolute number of Tregs was 36.3/μL ± 23.7 (range 6.7–149/μL) in MM; 38.8/μL ± 19.1 (range 4.3–87/μL) in MGUS; and 39.4/μL ± 12.5 (range 18–63/μL) in controls (p ns) (Figure 2). Patients with SMM were included within the MM group because of their mean percentage and absolute number levels for Tregs did not significantly differ from those of MGUS and active MM patients (data not shown).
Figure 2

Circulating Tregs, detected as percentage of all lymphocytes (a) and as absolute number (b) in controls (CTRL), monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance (MGUS), and multiple myeloma (MM) patients, including those with smoldering MM (SMM). Horizontal bars indicate mean (± standard deviation) values. No statistically significant differences were found among the three groups.

After a median follow-up of 38 months (range 28–42 months) 5 MGUS and 2 SMM transformed into overt MM; however both percentage and absolute number of Tregs did not predict this evolution. Moreover, with respect to MM patients and after a median follow-up of 33 months (range 22–40 months), Tregs did not show any significant correlation with main clinical and laboratory characteristics, in particular with the type and amount of M-component, international staging system (ISS), bone marrow plasma cell infiltration, PFS, and OS (data not shown). As cytogenetic data were available only in a minority of MM patients, it was not possible to include this parameter in the analysis. As shown in Figure 3, from a functional point of view, Tregs demonstrated to be able to inhibit autologous CD4+CD25− cells at a mean rate of 71.6%  ± 3% in healthy controls, 68.3%  ± 6% in MGUS, 73.3%  ± 9.1% in SMM, and 72.5%  ± 9.9% in active MM (p ns).
Figure 3

Percentage of inhibition of autologous CD4+CD25− cells in healthy controls (CTRL) (71.6%  ± 3%), monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance (MGUS) (68.3%  ± 6%), smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) (73.3%  ± 9.1%), and active multiple myeloma (MM) (72.5%  ± 9.9%) (p ns).

4. Discussion

Though it has been hypothesized that Tregs accumulate in the course of MM exerting an immunosuppressive function, thus favoring the progression of the disease, conflicting results have been published so far on the frequency and prognostic relevance of Tregs in monoclonal gammopathies (Table 2) [5-11]. The variable results reported by different groups which have investigated Tregs in MM are at least in part probably due to the heterogeneous experimental approaches used: bone marrow, whole blood, isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), depletion of CD25+ T-cells, different panel of monoclonal antibodies, and different analytical strategy to identify Tregs by means of flow cytometry (Table 2). In this setting, we choose to use CD127 evaluation, instead of FoxP3, to avoid technical bias due to permeabilization techniques and the subjectivity related to the variable expression of CD25 [3]. Furthermore, in our study, we analyzed peripheral blood. This must be taken into account because bone marrow Tregs frequency may differ from that found in peripheral blood. In fact, it has been reported that MM microenvironment support overexpression of FOXP3 and CTLA4 expression in bone marrow, thus suggesting an accumulation of immunosuppressive Tregs in the tumor microenvironment of MM patients [14]. The tumor growth and the failure of local immune control may be favored by changes in the bone marrow microenvironment, such as the accumulation of Tregs that may contribute to the immune imbalance in MM. However, in some studies, frequencies and total counts of Tregs were found similar in the bone marrow and peripheral blood of MM patients and control subjects [11].
Table 2

Most relevant published studies investigating the frequency and prognostic significance of Tregs in MM compared with the present study.

ReferencePatients/controls evaluatedSamples testedMethod used in Treg evaluationTregs frequencyFunctional studiesImpact on prognosis
Prabhala et al. [5]MGUSMMControlsIsolated PBMCCD4+FoxP3+ DecreasedUnable to suppress anti-CD3-mediated T-cell proliferationNot evaluated

Beyer et al. [6]MGUSMMControlsIsolated PBMCCD4+CD25highFoxP3+(% of CD4+ cells)Increased in MM versus MGUS (trend without statistical significance)Strong inhibitory functionNot evaluated

Feyler et al. [7]MGUSMMControlsIsolated PBMC and BMCD4+CD25+FoxP3+ Increased in PBMC but not in BMNot evaluatedCorrelation with disease burden (paraprotein)

Gupta et al. [8]MMIsolated PBMCCD4+CD25+CD127FoxP3+(% of CD4+ cells)Reduced in untreated which increased after treatment with lenalidomideAble to inhibit proliferation of CD4+CD25-T-cellsIncrease of Tregs in responding patients to therapy; decrease correlates with ISS I + II

Muthu Raja et al. [9]MGUSSMMMMPB/BM wholeCD4+CD25+CD127CD45RA+/−(% of CD4 cells)Increased in MM but not in SMM and MGUSAble to inhibit the proliferation of CD4+ T-cells and the secretion of IFN-γ Correlation with adverse clinical features (hypercalcemia, lower normal PC, and IgA subtype); no correlation with ISS; predict time to progression; MM patients with ≥5% of Tregs had inferior time to progression

Giannopoulos et al. [10]MMControlsIsolated PBMCCD4+CD25highFoxP3+ IncreasedNot evaluatedCorrelation with shorter overall survival

Foglietta et al. [11]MMMGUSControlsIsolated freshly PB and frozen BMCD4+CD25highFoxP3+ SimilarEffective suppressor functionNo correlation with the pattern of BM infiltration

Present studyMMMGUSControlsPBwholeCD4+CD25highCD127(% and absolute number)SimilarEffective suppressor functionNo correlation with laboratory and clinical variables; no correlation with outcome

BM: bone marrow; PB: peripheral blood; PBMC: peripheral blood mononuclear cells; MM: multiple myeloma; SMM: smoldering multiple myeloma; MGUS: monoclonal gammopathies of uncertain significance.

In almost all functional studies, Tregs activity was found comparable to that of healthy subjects, with the exception of the Prabhala et al. study [5]. In a critical revision published by Muthu Raja et al., this was attributed to the use of PBMC as responder cells [15]. From a functional point of view, our data are completely in agreement with those recently reported by Foglietta et al. [11]. Of interest, among their pleiotropic functions, immunomodulatory agents thalidomide and lenalidomide, currently used as standard therapy in MM, are able to decrease Tregs number and to inhibit their proliferation and immunosuppressive function [16, 17]. Other studies, however, have instead suggested that Tregs number may be increased using these drugs [17, 18]. Finally, two groups recently found that symptomatic MM patients with long-term survival (>10 years), accounting for about 5% of all MM patients, displayed a distinct immunological profile characterized by a lower number of BM and circulating Tregs, higher Th17 cells, and proliferative cytotoxic T-cells, compared to patients with shorter survival [19, 20]. Our study does not seem to support such an observation, but the relatively short follow-up of patients should be considered. In conclusion, our results indicate that the circulating number of Tregs does not differ among MGUS, MM, and normal subjects and does not seem to influence disease status or to provide prognostic information in MM patients as well. However, due to the contrasting results published so far, further studies are needed to better understand the possible role of Tregs in the pathogenesis and disease progression of MM, also in the light of the emerging role of novel immunotherapies, such as monoclonal antibodies, potentially active on minimal residual disease after specific treatments. Finally, the relevance of standardized methods to approach this field of investigation is also emphasized by the critical review of published data.
  20 in total

1.  Multiple myeloma and immunomodulation: regulating the regulatory cells.

Authors:  Chitta S Kasyapa; Taimur Sher; Asher A Chanan-Khan
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2012-04-03

2.  Analysis of the immune system of multiple myeloma patients achieving long-term disease control by multidimensional flow cytometry.

Authors:  Roberto J Pessoa de Magalhães; María-Belén Vidriales; Bruno Paiva; Carlos Fernandez-Gimenez; Ramón García-Sanz; Maria-Victoria Mateos; Norma C Gutierrez; Quentin Lecrevisse; Juan F Blanco; Jose Hernández; Natalia de las Heras; Joaquin Martinez-Lopez; Monica Roig; Elaine Sobral Costa; Enrique M Ocio; Martin Perez-Andres; Angelo Maiolino; Marcio Nucci; Javier De La Rubia; Juan-Jose Lahuerta; Jesús F San-Miguel; Alberto Orfao
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  Dysfunctional T regulatory cells in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Rao H Prabhala; Paola Neri; Jooeun E Bae; Pierfrancesco Tassone; Masood A Shammas; Charles K Allam; John F Daley; Dharminder Chauhan; Elizabeth Blanchard; Hemant S Thatte; Kenneth C Anderson; Nikhil C Munshi
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Flow cytometric detection of human regulatory T cells.

Authors:  Barbara Fazekas de St Groth; Erhua Zhu; Suzanne Asad; Loretta Lee
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2011

5.  Immune modulation by zoledronic acid in human myeloma: an advantageous cross-talk between Vγ9Vδ2 T cells, αβ CD8+ T cells, regulatory T cells, and dendritic cells.

Authors:  Barbara Castella; Chiara Riganti; Francesca Fiore; Francesca Pantaleoni; Maria Elisa Canepari; Silvia Peola; Myriam Foglietta; Antonio Palumbo; Amalia Bosia; Marta Coscia; Mario Boccadoro; Massimo Massaia
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  In vivo peripheral expansion of naive CD4+CD25high FoxP3+ regulatory T cells in patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Marc Beyer; Matthias Kochanek; Thomas Giese; Elmar Endl; Martin R Weihrauch; Percy A Knolle; Sabine Classen; Joachim L Schultze
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Regulatory T-cell number is increased in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients and correlates with progressive disease.

Authors:  Giovanni D'Arena; Luca Laurenti; Maria Marta Minervini; Silvia Deaglio; Lisa Bonello; Laura De Martino; Laura De Padua; Lucia Savino; Michela Tarnani; Vincenzo De Feo; Nicola Cascavilla
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 3.156

8.  The frequency of T regulatory cells modulates the survival of multiple myeloma patients: detailed characterisation of immune status in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  K Giannopoulos; W Kaminska; I Hus; A Dmoszynska
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Long-term survival in multiple myeloma is associated with a distinct immunological profile, which includes proliferative cytotoxic T-cell clones and a favourable Treg/Th17 balance.

Authors:  C Bryant; H Suen; R Brown; S Yang; J Favaloro; E Aklilu; J Gibson; P J Ho; H Iland; P Fromm; N Woodland; N Nassif; D Hart; D E Joshua
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 11.037

10.  FOXP3 and CTLA4 overexpression in multiple myeloma bone marrow as a sign of accumulation of CD4(+) T regulatory cells.

Authors:  Walter Moises Tobias Braga; Bruna Raphaeli da Silva; Ana Carolina de Carvalho; Yumi H Maekawa; Adriana Bruscato Bortoluzzo; Edgar Gil Rizzatti; Djordje Atanackovic; Gisele Wally Braga Colleoni
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 6.968

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in multiple myeloma. A literature review and lessons to learn.

Authors:  Ioannis Koutsavlis
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2020-10-03       Impact factor: 3.673

Review 2.  Regulatory T Cells and Their Prognostic Relevance in Hematologic Malignancies.

Authors:  Giovanni D'Arena; Candida Vitale; Marta Coscia; Agostino Festa; Nicola Matteo Dario Di Minno; Vincenzo De Feo; Michele Caraglia; Gioacchino Calapai; Luca Laurenti; Pellegrino Musto; Giovanni Di Minno; Daniela Fenoglio
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 4.818

Review 3.  Immunotherapy in myeloma: how far have we come?

Authors:  Laurens E Franssen; Tuna Mutis; Henk M Lokhorst; Niels W C J van de Donk
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2019-01-18

Review 4.  Predictive Role of Immune Profiling for Survival of Multiple Myeloma Patients.

Authors:  Liu Zhaoyun; Fu Rong
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 7.561

5.  Increased circulating CD4+FOXP3+ T cells associate with early relapse following autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma patients.

Authors:  Egor V Batorov; Marina A Tikhonova; Natalia V Pronkina; Irina V Kryuchkova; Vera V Sergeevicheva; Svetlana A Sizikova; Galina Y Ushakova; Tatiana A Aristova; Dariya S Batorova; Elena V Menyaeva; Andrey V Gilevich; Ekaterina Y Shevela; Alexander A Ostanin; Elena R Chernykh
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-06-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.