Literature DB >> 27493253

Coexistence of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Peninsular Florida Two Decades After Competitive Displacements.

L Philip Lounibos1, Irka Bargielowski2, María Cristina Carrasquilla2, Naoya Nishimura2.   

Abstract

The spread of Aedes albopictus (Skuse) eastward in the mid-1980s from its initial establishment in Houston, TX, was associated with rapid declines and local disappearances of Aedes aegypti (L.) in Gulf Coast states and Florida where annual larval surveillance during the early 1990s described temporal and spatial patterns of competitive displacements in cemeteries and tire shops. Approximately 20 yr later in 2013-2014, we re-visited former collection sites and sampled aquatic immatures of these two species from tire shops in 10 cities on State Route 441 and from 9 cemeteries from Lakeland to Miami in southwest Florida. In the recent samples Ae. aegypti was recovered from three central Florida cities where it had not been detected in 1994, but its northern limit on Rte. 441, Apopka, did not change. Other evidence, such as trends at a few cemeteries, suggested a moderate resurgence of this species since 1994. Cage experiments that exposed female progeny of Ae. aegypti from recent Florida collection sites to interspecific mating by Ae. albopictus males showed that females from coexistence sites had evolved resistance to cross-mating, but Ae. aegypti from sites with no Ae. albopictus were relatively susceptible to satyrization. Habitat classifications of collection sites were reduced by principal component (PC) analysis to four variables that accounted for > 99% of variances; PCs with strong positive loadings for tree cover and ground vegetation were associated with collection sites yielding only Ae. albopictus Within the coexistence range of the two species, the numbers of Ae. aegypti among total Aedes collected were strongly correlated in stepwise logistic regression models with two habitat-derived PCs, distance from the coast, and annual rainfall and mean maximum temperatures at the nearest weather station. Subtle increases in the range of Ae. aegypti since its previous displacements are interpreted in the context of the evolution of resistance to mating interference, realized versus fundamental niches of the two species, and persisting competition with Ae. albopictus.
© The Authors 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  competition; habitat preference; mating interference; satyrization; surveillance

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27493253     DOI: 10.1093/jme/tjw122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Entomol        ISSN: 0022-2585            Impact factor:   2.278


  19 in total

1.  Interspecific mating bias may drive Aedes albopictus displacement of Aedes aegypti during its range expansion.

Authors:  Jiayong Zhou; Shuang Liu; Hongkai Liu; Zhensheng Xie; Liping Liu; Lifeng Lin; Jinyong Jiang; Mingdong Yang; Guofa Zhou; Jinbao Gu; Xiaohong Zhou; Guiyun Yan; Anthony A James; Xiao-Guang Chen
Journal:  PNAS Nexus       Date:  2022-04-14

2.  Evidence for serial founder events during the colonization of North America by the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti.

Authors:  Evlyn Pless; Jeffrey R Powell; Krystal R Seger; Brett Ellis; Andrea Gloria-Soria
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.167

3.  Where Vectors Collide: The Importance of Mechanisms Shaping the Realized Niche for Modeling Ranges of Invasive Aedes Mosquitoes.

Authors:  L Philip Lounibos; Steven A Juliano
Journal:  Biol Invasions       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 3.133

4.  Patterns of Ecological Adaptation of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus and Stegomyia Indices Highlight the Potential Risk of Arbovirus Transmission in Yaoundé, the Capital City of Cameroon.

Authors:  Armel N Tedjou; Basile Kamgang; Aurélie P Yougang; Theodel A Wilson-Bahun; Flobert Njiokou; Charles S Wondji
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2020-06-20

5.  Determining environmental and anthropogenic factors which explain the global distribution of Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus.

Authors:  Borame Lee Dickens; Haoyang Sun; Mark Jit; Alex R Cook; Luis Roman Carrasco
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2018-09-03

6.  Update on the geographical distribution and prevalence of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae), two major arbovirus vectors in Cameroon.

Authors:  Armel N Tedjou; Basile Kamgang; Aurélie P Yougang; Flobert Njiokou; Charles S Wondji
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2019-03-18

7.  Demonstration of resistance to satyrization behavior in Aedes aegypti from La Réunion island.

Authors:  Hamidou Maïga; Jérémie R L Gilles; Rosemary Susan Lees; Hanano Yamada; Jérémy Bouyer
Journal:  Parasite       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 8.  Globe-Trotting Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus: Risk Factors for Arbovirus Pandemics.

Authors:  Olivia Wesula Lwande; Vincent Obanda; Anders Lindström; Clas Ahlm; Magnus Evander; Jonas Näslund; Göran Bucht
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 2.133

Review 9.  Effects of desiccation stress on adult female longevity in Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae): results of a systematic review and pooled survival analysis.

Authors:  Chris A Schmidt; Genevieve Comeau; Andrew J Monaghan; Daniel J Williamson; Kacey C Ernst
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Patterns of genetic divergence among populations of Aedes aegypti L. (Diptera: Culicidae) in the southeastern USA.

Authors:  Kristen A Hopperstad; Michael H Reiskind; Paul E Labadie; Martha O Burford Reiskind
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 3.876

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.