Literature DB >> 27493160

U.S. RESEARCH MANAGEMENT. NSF tries two-step review, drawing praise--and darts.

Jeffrey Mervis.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2016        PMID： 27493160     DOI： 10.1126/science.353.6299.528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN： 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

Review 1.  What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?

Authors:  Susan Guthrie; Ioana Ghiga; Steven Wooding
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-08-07

2.  Why can't we make research grant allocation systems more consistent? A personal opinion.

Authors:  Roger Cousens
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Assessing health research grant applications: A retrospective comparative review of a one-stage versus a two-stage application assessment process.

Authors:  Ben Morgan; Ly-Mee Yu; Tom Solomon; Sue Ziebland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.