Literature DB >> 27492788

Point of data saturation was assessed using resampling methods in a survey with open-ended questions.

Viet-Thi Tran1, Raphael Porcher2, Bruno Falissard3, Philippe Ravaud4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe methods to determine sample sizes in surveys using open-ended questions and to assess how resampling methods can be used to determine data saturation in these surveys. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: We searched the literature for surveys with open-ended questions and assessed the methods used to determine sample size in 100 studies selected at random. Then, we used Monte Carlo simulations on data from a previous study on the burden of treatment to assess the probability of identifying new themes as a function of the number of patients recruited.
RESULTS: In the literature, 85% of researchers used a convenience sample, with a median size of 167 participants (interquartile range [IQR] = 69-406). In our simulation study, the probability of identifying at least one new theme for the next included subject was 32%, 24%, and 12% after the inclusion of 30, 50, and 100 subjects, respectively. The inclusion of 150 participants at random resulted in the identification of 92% themes (IQR = 91-93%) identified in the original study.
CONCLUSION: In our study, data saturation was most certainly reached for samples >150 participants. Our method may be used to determine when to continue the study to find new themes or stop because of futility.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer simulation; Data saturation; Qualitative research; Simulation methods; Surveys and questionnaires; Surveys with open-ended questions

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27492788     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  6 in total

1.  Dog Handler Beliefs regarding Barriers and Facilitators to Canine Health Promotion and Injury Prevention in Swedish Working Dog Trials and Competitions.

Authors:  Ann Essner; Catarina Kjellerstedt; Amie L Hesbach; Kristina Svensson; Helena Igelström
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-05-21

2.  Childhood Obesity Evidence Base Project: Methods for Taxonomy Development for Application in Taxonomic Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Heather King; Mackenzie Magnus; Larry V Hedges; Chris Cyr; Deborah Young-Hyman; Laura Kettel Khan; Lori A J Scott-Sheldon; Jason A Saul; Sonia Arteaga; John Cawley; Christina D Economos; Debra Haire-Joshu; Christine M Hunter; Bruce Y Lee; Shiriki K Kumanyika; Lorrene D Ritchie; Thomas N Robinson; Marlene B Schwartz
Journal:  Child Obes       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.992

3.  Gamblers' perceptions of responsibility for gambling harm: a critical qualitative inquiry.

Authors:  Sarah Marko; Samantha L Thomas; Kim Robinson; Mike Daube
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Influence of cigarette packet branding and colours on young male smokers' recognition, appeal and harm perceptions of tobacco brands in Cambodia: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Thomas Stubbs; Victoria White; Hua-Hie Yong; Chhea Chhordaphea; John W Toumbourou
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  Barriers and facilitators for provision of oral health care in dependent older people: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gerd Göstemeyer; Sarah R Baker; Falk Schwendicke
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Consumer perception of food variety in the UK: an exploratory mixed-methods analysis.

Authors:  Rochelle Embling; Aimee E Pink; Michelle D Lee; Menna Price; Laura L Wilkinson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 3.295

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.