Vito Mannacio1, Luigi Mannacio2, Emilo Mango3, Anita Antignano4, Michele Mottola2, Sergio Caparrotti3, Francesco Musumeci5, Carlo Vosa2. 1. Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy. Electronic address: vitomannacio2@libero.it. 2. Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy. 3. Cardiac Surgery Unit, Casa di Cura Montevergine, Mercogliano, Italy. 4. Department of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Santobono-Pausillipon, Naples, Italy. 5. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Camillo Forlanini, Rome, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) is considered to further decrease survival compared to moderate PPM. This study aimed to assess the impact of severe PPM on survival after aortic valve replacement (AVR). METHODS: We retrospectively studied 2404 consecutive patients with PPM who underwent first-time AVR for pure stenosis between January 2003 and December 2014. Mismatch was moderate for indexed effective valve orifice >0.65 to <0.85cm2/m2 and severe for indexed effective valve orifice ≤0.65cm2/m2. Moderate mismatch occurred in 2165 patients (89%), and severe in 239 (11%) patients. Logistic multiple regression with bootstrapping and propensity score analyses were performed using 29 clinical and demographic data to assess the risk-adjusted impact of severe mismatch on mortality. The Cox proportional hazards model was constructed to process the long-term outcome. RESULTS: Early mortality was 2.3% (51/2165) in moderate mismatch group and 3.7% (9/239) in severe mismatch group (p=0.2). Mortality at 5 and 10 years, was 218/1470 (14.8%) and 252/585 (43.1%) for moderate mismatch and 43/198 (21.7%) and 61/105 (58.1%) for severe mismatch (p=0.02 and p=0.006). Multivariable predictors of late mortality were as follows: age ≥70 years, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%, indexed left ventricular mass >220g/m2 and concomitant coronary artery revascularization. After propensity score matching, conditional logistic regression analysis demonstrated no relationship between severe mismatch and increased mortality at 5 postoperative years (HR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.7-1.6; p=0.06), whereas it was significant at 10 postoperative years (HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2-2.5; p=0.03). During the follow-up, severe mismatch was associated with more frequent hospital readmissions for cardiac events (0.12 vs. 0.08 events/patient/year, p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe mismatch had lower long-term survival and higher incidence of hospital readmissions for cardiac events. However, the effect of severe mismatch on outcome appeared mainly related to the preoperative risk profile of each patient.
BACKGROUND: Severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) is considered to further decrease survival compared to moderate PPM. This study aimed to assess the impact of severe PPM on survival after aortic valve replacement (AVR). METHODS: We retrospectively studied 2404 consecutive patients with PPM who underwent first-time AVR for pure stenosis between January 2003 and December 2014. Mismatch was moderate for indexed effective valve orifice >0.65 to <0.85cm2/m2 and severe for indexed effective valve orifice ≤0.65cm2/m2. Moderate mismatch occurred in 2165 patients (89%), and severe in 239 (11%) patients. Logistic multiple regression with bootstrapping and propensity score analyses were performed using 29 clinical and demographic data to assess the risk-adjusted impact of severe mismatch on mortality. The Cox proportional hazards model was constructed to process the long-term outcome. RESULTS: Early mortality was 2.3% (51/2165) in moderate mismatch group and 3.7% (9/239) in severe mismatch group (p=0.2). Mortality at 5 and 10 years, was 218/1470 (14.8%) and 252/585 (43.1%) for moderate mismatch and 43/198 (21.7%) and 61/105 (58.1%) for severe mismatch (p=0.02 and p=0.006). Multivariable predictors of late mortality were as follows: age ≥70 years, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%, indexed left ventricular mass >220g/m2 and concomitant coronary artery revascularization. After propensity score matching, conditional logistic regression analysis demonstrated no relationship between severe mismatch and increased mortality at 5 postoperative years (HR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.7-1.6; p=0.06), whereas it was significant at 10 postoperative years (HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2-2.5; p=0.03). During the follow-up, severe mismatch was associated with more frequent hospital readmissions for cardiac events (0.12 vs. 0.08 events/patient/year, p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS:Patients with severe mismatch had lower long-term survival and higher incidence of hospital readmissions for cardiac events. However, the effect of severe mismatch on outcome appeared mainly related to the preoperative risk profile of each patient.
Authors: Vahid Sadri; Charles H Bloodworth; Immanuel David Madukauwa-David; Prem A Midha; Vrishank Raghav; Ajit P Yoganathan Journal: Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2019-06-27
Authors: Maria Estefania Otto; Fernando Antibas Atik; Marcelo do Nascimento Moreira; Luiz Carlos Madruga Ribeiro; Bianca Corrêa Rocha de Mello; Joyce Gomes Elias Lima; Maiara Sanchez Ribeiro; Ana Carolina Pereira Matos Domingues; Reyna Pinheiro Calzada; Armindo Jreige; Larissa Lucas Schloicka; Philippe Pibarot Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: C S Hiremath; Anil R Jain; Anurag Garg; Nirmal Gupta; Yugal K Mishra; Zile Singh Meharwal; Nityanand Thakur; Atul A Maslekar; Naman Shastri Journal: J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2020-06-15 Impact factor: 1.637