R R Bannuru1, M Osani2, E E Vaysbrot2, T E McAlindon2. 1. Center for Treatment Comparison and Integrative Analysis (CTCIA), Division of Rheumatology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: rbannuru@tuftsmedicalcenter.org. 2. Center for Treatment Comparison and Integrative Analysis (CTCIA), Division of Rheumatology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Intra-articular (IA) hyaluronic acid (HA) is considered a safer alternative to oral Non-Steroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids for knee osteoarthritis (OA). A recent review raised potential safety concerns about HA, warranting further review of safety outcomes. We examined the risks of HA compared with IA placebo and investigated whether the risks vary among individual HA preparations. METHODS: We searched all relevant databases from inception to October 2015 and sought unpublished data. We included all knee OA trials which compared any of the 18 HA products and reported on adverse events (AEs) and withdrawals. We calculated odds ratios for safety data reported at the longest follow-up. Network meta-analysis was performed using a Bayesian hierarchical random effects model for mixed multiple treatment comparisons. RESULTS: We identified 74 studies involving 13,032 participants aged between 45 and 75 years. The proportion of women ranged from 28% to 100%. The overall incidence of local reactions reported across all products was 8.5%. Commonly reported AEs were transient local reactions, such as pain, swelling and arthralgia, which subsided rapidly. None of the HA products were statistically significantly different from IA placebo or from each other with regard to incidence of AEs. Three treatment-related serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported among 9214 participants. CONCLUSIONS: Given the very low incidence of any particular AEs, we conclude that HA products are relatively well tolerated. These products have a similar safety profile compared to each other. This information along with the comparative effectiveness profile and relative cost would be helpful for clinicians in delivering individualized patient care.
PURPOSE:Intra-articular (IA) hyaluronic acid (HA) is considered a safer alternative to oral Non-Steroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids for knee osteoarthritis (OA). A recent review raised potential safety concerns about HA, warranting further review of safety outcomes. We examined the risks of HA compared with IA placebo and investigated whether the risks vary among individual HA preparations. METHODS: We searched all relevant databases from inception to October 2015 and sought unpublished data. We included all knee OA trials which compared any of the 18 HA products and reported on adverse events (AEs) and withdrawals. We calculated odds ratios for safety data reported at the longest follow-up. Network meta-analysis was performed using a Bayesian hierarchical random effects model for mixed multiple treatment comparisons. RESULTS: We identified 74 studies involving 13,032 participants aged between 45 and 75 years. The proportion of women ranged from 28% to 100%. The overall incidence of local reactions reported across all products was 8.5%. Commonly reported AEs were transient local reactions, such as pain, swelling and arthralgia, which subsided rapidly. None of the HA products were statistically significantly different from IA placebo or from each other with regard to incidence of AEs. Three treatment-related serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported among 9214 participants. CONCLUSIONS: Given the very low incidence of any particular AEs, we conclude that HA products are relatively well tolerated. These products have a similar safety profile compared to each other. This information along with the comparative effectiveness profile and relative cost would be helpful for clinicians in delivering individualized patient care.
Authors: Nicola Veronese; Cyrus Cooper; Jean-Yves Reginster; Marc Hochberg; Jaime Branco; Olivier Bruyère; Roland Chapurlat; Nasser Al-Daghri; Elaine Dennison; Gabriel Herrero-Beaumont; Jean-François Kaux; Emmanuel Maheu; René Rizzoli; Roland Roth; Lucio C Rovati; Daniel Uebelhart; Mila Vlaskovska; André Scheen Journal: Semin Arthritis Rheum Date: 2019-01-11 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Nicolas S Piuzzi; Ronald J Midura; George F Muschler; Vincent C Hascall Journal: Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis Date: 2018-01-22 Impact factor: 5.346
Authors: Sebastián Cruz Rodriguez-García; Raul Castellanos-Moreira; Jacqueline Uson; Esperanza Naredo; Terence W O'Neill; Michael Doherty; Mikael Boesen; Hemant Pandit; Ingrid Möller Parera; Valentina Vardanyan; Lene Terslev; Will Uwe Kampen; Maria Antonieta D'Agostino; Francis Berenbaum; Elena Nikiphorou; Irene Pitsillidou; Jenny de la Torre-Aboki; Loreto Carmona Journal: RMD Open Date: 2021-06
Authors: Ivan Delgado-Enciso; Juan Paz-Garcia; Alejandrina Rodriguez-Hernandez; Violeta M Madrigal-Perez; Ariana Cabrera-Licona; Alejandro Garcia-Rivera; Alejandro D Soriano-Hernandez; Jose L Cortes-Bazan; Hector R Galvan-Salazar; Jose Valtierra-Alvarez; Jose Guzman-Esquivel; Iram P Rodriguez-Sanchez; Margarita L Martinez-Fierro; Brenda Paz-Michel Journal: Mol Med Rep Date: 2017-12-20 Impact factor: 2.952