Literature DB >> 27492023

Nanoparticle-mediated siRNA delivery assessed in a 3D co-culture model simulating prostate cancer bone metastasis.

Kathleen A Fitzgerald1, Jianfeng Guo1, Rosanne M Raftery2, Irene Mencía Castaño2, Caroline M Curtin2, Matt Gooding1, Raphael Darcy1, Fergal J O' Brien2, Caitriona M O' Driscoll3.   

Abstract

siRNA has emerged as a potential therapeutic for the treatment of prostate cancer but effective delivery remains a major barrier to its clinical application. This study aimed to develop and characterise a 3D in vitro co-culture model to simulate prostate cancer bone metastasis and to assess the ability of the model to investigate nanoparticle-mediated siRNA delivery and gene knockdown. PC3 or LNCaP prostate cancer cells were co-cultured with hFOB 1.19 osteoblast cells in 2D on plastic tissue culture plates and in 3D on collagen scaffolds mimicking the bone microenvironment. To characterise the co-culture model, cell proliferation, enzyme secretion and the utility of two different gene delivery vectors to mediate siRNA uptake and gene knockdown were assessed. Cell proliferation was reduced by∼50% by day 7 in the co-culture system relative to monoculture (PC3 and LNCaP co-cultures, in 2D and 3D) and an enhanced level of MMP9 (a marker of bone metastasis) was secreted into the media (1.2-4-fold increase depending on the co-culture system). A cationic cyclodextrin gene delivery vector proved significantly less toxic in the co-culture system relative to the commercially available vector Lipofectamine 2000(®). In addition, knockdown of both the GAPDH gene (minimum 15%) and RelA subunit of the NF-κB transcription factor (minimum 20%) was achieved in 2D and 3D cell co-cultures. Results indicate that the prostate cancer-osteoblast in vitro co-culture model was more physiologically relevant vs the monoculture. This model has the potential to help improve the design and efficacy of gene delivery formulations, to more accurately predict in vivo performance and, therefore, to reduce the risk of product failure in late-stage clinical development.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D co-culture; Collagen-based scaffolds; Gene delivery; Modified cyclodextrin; Osteoblasts; Prostate cancer cells

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27492023     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.07.079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pharm        ISSN: 0378-5173            Impact factor:   5.875


  9 in total

1.  Tetraethylenepentamine-Coated β Cyclodextrin Nanoparticles for Dual DNA and siRNA Delivery.

Authors:  Chi-Hsien Liu; Pei-Yin Shih; Cheng-Han Lin; Yi-Jun Chen; Wei-Chi Wu; Chun-Chao Wang
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 6.525

2.  3d Tissue Engineered In Vitro Models Of Cancer In Bone.

Authors:  Anna M Sitarski; Heather Fairfield; Carolyne Falank; Michaela R Reagan
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2017-06-09

Review 3.  Tissue-engineered 3D models for elucidating primary and metastatic bone cancer progression.

Authors:  Eva C González Díaz; Sauradeep Sinha; Raffi S Avedian; Fan Yang
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  3D models of the bone marrow in health and disease: yesterday, today and tomorrow.

Authors:  Annamarija Raic; Toufik Naolou; Anna Mohra; Chandralekha Chatterjee; Cornelia Lee-Thedieck
Journal:  MRS Commun       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 2.566

Review 5.  MicroRNAs as therapeutic targets in breast cancer metastasis.

Authors:  Fahima Danesh Pouya; Yousef Rasmi; Maria Gazouli; Eleni Zografos; Mohadeseh Nemati
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.617

6.  Staphylococcus aureus protein A causes osteoblasts to hyper-mineralise in a 3D extra-cellular matrix environment.

Authors:  Nicola Kavanagh; Fergal J O'Brien; Steve W Kerrigan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Recent Advances in Nanomedicine for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis.

Authors:  Daniel E Hagaman; Jossana A Damasco; Joy Vanessa D Perez; Raniv D Rojo; Marites P Melancon
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 8.  Microfluidic on-chip biomimicry for 3D cell culture: a fit-for-purpose investigation from the end user standpoint.

Authors:  Ye Liu; Elisabeth Gill; Yan Yan Shery Huang
Journal:  Future Sci OA       Date:  2017-03-02

Review 9.  The optimized drug delivery systems of treating cancer bone metastatic osteolysis with nanomaterials.

Authors:  Xi Cheng; Jinrong Wei; Qi Ge; Danlei Xing; Xuefeng Zhou; Yunzhu Qian; Guoqin Jiang
Journal:  Drug Deliv       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 6.819

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.