A Prioreschi1, L K Micklesfield2. 1. MRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. alessandra.prioreschi@wits.ac.za. 2. MRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The first few years of life have been identified as a critical stage in the development of activity behaviours, which have been shown to track into later life. This scoping review aims to assess the literature reporting on physical activity levels in the first 2 years of life in order to answer two main questions: (i) how is physical activity measured in this age group? and (ii) how active are infants and toddlers in the first 2 years of life? METHODS: A search strategy was employed using PubMed with restrictions only on age and language. After applying exclusion criteria, 20 papers were included in the results. RESULTS: Seventeen studies used some form of objective assessment of physical activity (accelerometers, actometers, direct observation, doubly labelled water or a metabolic chamber); while the remaining three relied on subjective assessments (parent reported questionnaires or interviews, and activity diaries). Nine studies exclusively assessed infants (<12 months), and five exclusively assessed toddlers (>12 months). Only six studies reported physical activity levels and patterns specifically; most included studies measured activity as a covariate or correlate. Therefore, much of the reported data was difficult to assess, as results were vague or incompletely described. Where data were reported sufficiently for analysis, results were equally conflicted regarding whether toddlers were meeting recommended physical activity guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review re-iterates the fact that more studies need to be conducted, which focus primarily on measuring and reporting physical activity levels and patterns in this age group in a comprehensive and standardized way, so that more informed guidelines can be devised and interventions can be designed and implemented where necessary.
BACKGROUND: The first few years of life have been identified as a critical stage in the development of activity behaviours, which have been shown to track into later life. This scoping review aims to assess the literature reporting on physical activity levels in the first 2 years of life in order to answer two main questions: (i) how is physical activity measured in this age group? and (ii) how active are infants and toddlers in the first 2 years of life? METHODS: A search strategy was employed using PubMed with restrictions only on age and language. After applying exclusion criteria, 20 papers were included in the results. RESULTS: Seventeen studies used some form of objective assessment of physical activity (accelerometers, actometers, direct observation, doubly labelled water or a metabolic chamber); while the remaining three relied on subjective assessments (parent reported questionnaires or interviews, and activity diaries). Nine studies exclusively assessed infants (<12 months), and five exclusively assessed toddlers (>12 months). Only six studies reported physical activity levels and patterns specifically; most included studies measured activity as a covariate or correlate. Therefore, much of the reported data was difficult to assess, as results were vague or incompletely described. Where data were reported sufficiently for analysis, results were equally conflicted regarding whether toddlers were meeting recommended physical activity guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review re-iterates the fact that more studies need to be conducted, which focus primarily on measuring and reporting physical activity levels and patterns in this age group in a comprehensive and standardized way, so that more informed guidelines can be devised and interventions can be designed and implemented where necessary.
Authors: Emily R Shull; Marsha Dowda; Kerry L McIver; Alexander C McLain; Sara E Benjamin-Neelon; Beverly Ulrich; Russell R Pate Journal: Child Obes Date: 2022-02-10 Impact factor: 2.867
Authors: Kathryn R Hesketh; Claire O'Malley; Veena Mazarello Paes; Helen Moore; Carolyn Summerbell; Ken K Ong; Rajalakshmi Lakshman; Esther M F van Sluijs Journal: Sports Med Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Sara E Benjamin Neelon; Truls Østbye; Gary G Bennett; Richard M Kravitz; Shayna M Clancy; Marissa Stroo; Edwin Iversen; Cathrine Hoyo Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-02-08 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Alessandra Prioreschi; Thomas Nappey; Kate Westgate; Patrick Olivier; Soren Brage; Lisa Kim Micklesfield Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2018-03-01
Authors: Kylie D Hesketh; Katherine L Downing; Karen Campbell; David Crawford; Jo Salmon; Jill A Hnatiuk Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-11-20 Impact factor: 3.295