Literature DB >> 27491705

Spatial frequency processing in the central and peripheral visual field during scene viewing.

Anke Cajar1, Ralf Engbert2, Jochen Laubrock2.   

Abstract

Visuospatial attention and gaze control depend on the interaction of foveal and peripheral processing. The foveal and peripheral regions of the visual field are differentially sensitive to parts of the spatial-frequency spectrum. In two experiments, we investigated how the selective attenuation of spatial frequencies in the central or the peripheral visual field affects eye-movement behavior during real-world scene viewing. Gaze-contingent low-pass or high-pass filters with varying filter levels (i.e., cutoff frequencies; Experiment 1) or filter sizes (Experiment 2) were applied. Compared to unfiltered control conditions, mean fixation durations increased most with central high-pass and peripheral low-pass filtering. Increasing filter size prolonged fixation durations with peripheral filtering, but not with central filtering. Increasing filter level prolonged fixation durations with low-pass filtering, but not with high-pass filtering. These effects indicate that fixation durations are not always longer under conditions of increased processing difficulty. Saccade amplitudes largely adapted to processing difficulty: amplitudes increased with central filtering and decreased with peripheral filtering; the effects strengthened with increasing filter size and filter level. In addition, we observed a trade-off between saccade timing and saccadic selection, since saccade amplitudes were modulated when fixation durations were unaffected by the experimental manipulations. We conclude that interactions of perception and gaze control are highly sensitive to experimental manipulations of input images as long as the residual information can still be accessed for gaze control.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Eye movements; Gaze-contingent displays; Scene viewing; Spatial frequencies

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27491705     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  6 in total

1.  Saliency-Aware Subtle Augmentation Improves Human Visual Search Performance in VR.

Authors:  Olga Lukashova-Sanz; Siegfried Wahl
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-02-25

2.  Using eye movements to detect visual field loss: a pragmatic assessment using simulated scotoma.

Authors:  Daniel S Asfaw; Pete R Jones; Laura A Edwards; Nicholas D Smith; David P Crabb
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Potsdam Eye-Movement Corpus for Scene Memorization and Search With Color and Spatial-Frequency Filtering.

Authors:  Anke Cajar; Ralf Engbert; Jochen Laubrock
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-23

4.  Current foveal inspection and previous peripheral preview influence subsequent eye movement decisions.

Authors:  Christian Wolf; Artem V Belopolsky; Markus Lappe
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-08-13

5.  Fixation durations in natural scene viewing are guided by peripheral scene content.

Authors:  Wolfgang Einhäuser; Charlotte Atzert; Antje Nuthmann
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  What are the visuo-motor tendencies of omnidirectional scene free-viewing in virtual reality?

Authors:  Erwan Joël David; Pierre Lebranchu; Matthieu Perreira Da Silva; Patrick Le Callet
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.