Literature DB >> 27490767

Geographical disparity in breast reconstruction following mastectomy has reduced over time.

Paramita Dasgupta1, Philippa H Youl1,2,3, Christopher Pyke4, Joanne F Aitken1,2,5, Peter D Baade1,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast reconstruction (BR) following mastectomy for breast cancer has been shown to improve quality of life and body image; however, there is significant geographic variation in BR rates. We explored factors associated with BR following mastectomy.
METHODS: This is a population-based data linkage study consisting of cancer registry records linked to hospital inpatient episodes for 4104 women aged 20 years and over-diagnosed with a first primary invasive localized stage breast cancer between 1997 and 2012 in Queensland, Australia, who underwent a mastectomy. Multivariate logistic regression was used to model predictors of BR.
RESULTS: Overall, 481 women (11.7%) underwent reconstruction. Proportions increased over time and were higher for younger women. Younger age, more recent diagnosis, living in high or very high accessibility areas or less disadvantaged areas, smaller tumours and attending a private or high-volume hospital independently increased the odds of reconstruction. The geographical disparity reduced significantly over time.
CONCLUSION: Geographical barriers to accessing BR have reduced; however, continued monitoring and further research to inform strategies to further reduce subgroup disparities remain a priority.
© 2016 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; healthcare disparities; mastectomy; reconstructive surgical procedure; trends

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27490767     DOI: 10.1111/ans.13710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  6 in total

1.  Racial Disparity in Immediate Breast Reconstruction; a Gap That is not Closing.

Authors:  Mahdi Malekpour; Sean Devitt; Joseph DeSantis; Christian Kauffman
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 0.558

2.  Influence of geographic access and socioeconomic characteristics on breast cancer outcomes: A systematic review.

Authors:  Benoit Conti; Audrey Bochaton; Hélène Charreire; Hélène Kitzis-Bonsang; Caroline Desprès; Sandrine Baffert; Charlotte Ngô
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Variations in outcomes by residential location for women with breast cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Paramita Dasgupta; Peter D Baade; Danny R Youlden; Gail Garvey; Joanne F Aitken; Isabella Wallington; Jennifer Chynoweth; Helen Zorbas; Philippa H Youl
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-29       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Patterns of immediate breast reconstruction in New South Wales, Australia: a population-based study.

Authors:  Yingyu Feng; Kathy Flitcroft; Marina T van Leeuwen; Adam G Elshaug; Andrew Spillane; Sallie-Anne Pearson
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 1.872

5.  Reoperation after breast-conserving surgery for cancer in Australia: statewide cohort study of linked hospital data.

Authors:  Marina T van Leeuwen; Michael O Falster; Claire M Vajdic; Philip J Crowe; Sanja Lujic; Elizabeth Klaes; Louisa Jorm; Art Sedrakyan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Quantifying the Costs to Different Funders over Five-Years for Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer in Queensland, Australia: A Data Linkage Study.

Authors:  Daniel Lindsay; Emily Callander
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.