Literature DB >> 27490008

Biological Risk Factors for Nonunion of Bone Fracture.

Robert Zura1, Samir Mehta, Gregory J Della Rocca, R Grant Steen.   

Abstract

Many risk factors for fracture nonunion are well supported in the orthopaedic literature, including location of the fracture site, surgical treatment, bone displacement, type of fixation, treatment delay, comminution, inadequate treatment, and wound infection. However, evidence from a systematic review suggests that patient-related or biological causes of nonunion may not be as well understood. Understanding the biological causes of nonunion is important for several reasons. Risk factors might identify patients prone to nonunion who could benefit from more aggressive intervention, and a clear idea of nonunion risk could be important when choosing between competing therapeutic options. Risk factors also can inform the design of clinical trials and clarify patient inclusion and exclusion criteria, so that small studies can yield more definitive answers. Finally, an understanding of patient risk profiles may enable clinicians to counsel patients more effectively and to set appropriate expectations for success. Patient age appears to be a strong risk factor for nonunion in some bones, a weak risk factor for nonunion in other bones, and perhaps not a significant risk factor for nonunion in certain bones. This observation suggests that there can be substantial bone-to-bone variation in nonunion risk. Age also may be a surrogate for the prevalence of risk factors that potentially increase with age, such as smoking, diabetes, obesity, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use. Smoking has been replicated as a risk factor for nonunion only in retrospective studies involving the humerus and tibia. Smoking appears to have an important effect on nonunion, yet the incremental risk may be rather small, except in context with additional risk factors. Diabetes has been confirmed as a risk factor for nonunion only in retrospective studies involving the foot and ankle. Nonunion risk from diabetes alone may be small and the context of additional risk factors crucial; this could account for why it has been so difficult to predict nonunion in the individual patient. Prediction of fracture nonunion in the individual patient is a difficult problem. Fracture nonunion may be influenced by complex interactions between biological and surgical risk factors, and the nonunion rate varies from bone to bone. A randomized clinical trial may not appropriately control for all potential correlates and confounders and may require impractical sample sizes. A large claims-based study of real-world fracture-healing outcomes is needed to provide guidance for randomized clinical trials that can test risk factors more rigorously.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27490008     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.O.00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JBJS Rev        ISSN: 2329-9185


  27 in total

1.  [18F]FDG PET/CT in non-union: improving the diagnostic performances by using both PET and CT criteria.

Authors:  Martina Sollini; Nicoletta Trenti; Emiliano Malagoli; Marco Catalano; Lorenzo Di Mento; Alexander Kirienko; Marco Berlusconi; Arturo Chiti; Lidija Antunovic
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Varus collapse following anterior closing wedge proximal tibial osteotomy for ACL revision reconstruction: a case series.

Authors:  Ian S MacLean; William A Tyndall; Robert C Schenck; Mark D Miller
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2022-10-04

3.  Proximal ulna non-union: treatment concept and postoperative outcome.

Authors:  Tim Jakobi; Yves Gramlich; Matthias Sauter; Sebastian Fischer; Reinhard Hoffmann; Alexander Klug
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 3.479

Review 4.  Electrical Stimulation of Acute Fractures: A Narrative Review of Stimulation Protocols and Device Specifications.

Authors:  Peter J Nicksic; D'Andrea T Donnelly; Nishant Verma; Allison J Setiz; Andrew J Shoffstall; Kip A Ludwig; Aaron M Dingle; Samuel O Poore
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-02

Review 5.  Modifying MSC Phenotype to Facilitate Bone Healing: Biological Approaches.

Authors:  Stuart B Goodman; Tzuhua Lin
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-06-24

6.  Direct Fixation of C1 Jefferson Fracture Using C1 Lateral Mass Screws: A Case Report.

Authors:  Aravind Kumar; James Onggo; Lim Hai Fon; Jacob Oh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-08-31

Review 7.  Gut microbial-derived short-chain fatty acids and bone: a potential role in fracture healing.

Authors:  A Wallimann; W Magrath; K Thompson; T Moriarty; R G Richards; C A Akdis; L O'Mahony; C J Hernandez
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.325

8.  What Proportion of Patients Undergoing Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy Experience Nonunion, and What Factors are Associated with Nonunion?

Authors:  Courtney M Selberg; Ariel D Davila-Parrilla; Kathryn A Williams; Young-Jo Kim; Michael B Millis; Eduardo N Novais
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 4.755

9.  Impairment of maturation of BMP-6 (35 kDa) correlates with delayed fracture healing in experimental diabetes.

Authors:  Qidong Guo; Weijie Wang; Rami Abboud; Zheng Guo
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Risk factors for nonunion of bone fracture in pediatric patients: An inception cohort study of 237,033 fractures.

Authors:  Robert Zura; Sue C Kaste; Michael J Heffernan; William K Accousti; Dominic Gargiulo; Zhe Wang; R Grant Steen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.