Haya Raz1, Nili Tabak2, Shulamith Kreitler3. 1. Nursing Department, Machon Tal, Jerusalem College of Technology , Jerusalem , Israel. 2. Faculty of Nursing, School of Health Professions, Tel-Aviv University Medical School , Tel-Aviv , Israel. 3. Psychooncology Research Center, Sheba Medical Center, School of Psychological Sciences, Tel-Aviv University , Tel-Aviv , Israel.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This innovative pilot study was designed to provide research-based evidence on the variables to consider informing a child of his/her cancer diagnosis, so as to minimize the negative psychosocial effects of the cancer experience on survivors. The hypotheses of the study were that "good information" about cancer, will allow the child a better understanding way to cope with treatment and improve sociopsychological outcomes at adulthood. METHODS: Ninety-one adult childhood cancer (CC) survivors got the questionnaires while waiting to their routine checkup at a grate CC medical center in center Israel. RESULTS: To our surprise and not according to the hypothesis, there was a difference between children diagnosed up to 12 years of age and those diagnosed during adolescence. (Participants were divided into two groups according to their age at diagnosis: from birth to 12 years old and from age 12-18). In the group diagnosed at a younger age, those who had received "good information" were found to have better quality of life, lower mental pain, and higher mental pain tolerance than did those in the same group (diagnosed at a younger age) who received "not good information." By contrast, in the group diagnosed during adolescence, those who had received "not good information" scored higher on these measures than did their counterparts who had received "good information." CONCLUSION: Given that information conveyed to children diagnosed with cancer can have a significant impact on survivors' quality of life, further research is needed to determine the precise information to be divulged to children at the time of diagnosis. In the meantime, extreme caution, sensitivity, and careful judgment are required. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Findings of the current study and of future studies can be used to formulate clear guidelines for assessing a child's readiness and the information to be divulged, so as to improve the quality of life of CC survivors.
PURPOSE: This innovative pilot study was designed to provide research-based evidence on the variables to consider informing a child of his/her cancer diagnosis, so as to minimize the negative psychosocial effects of the cancer experience on survivors. The hypotheses of the study were that "good information" about cancer, will allow the child a better understanding way to cope with treatment and improve sociopsychological outcomes at adulthood. METHODS: Ninety-one adult childhood cancer (CC) survivors got the questionnaires while waiting to their routine checkup at a grate CC medical center in center Israel. RESULTS: To our surprise and not according to the hypothesis, there was a difference between children diagnosed up to 12 years of age and those diagnosed during adolescence. (Participants were divided into two groups according to their age at diagnosis: from birth to 12 years old and from age 12-18). In the group diagnosed at a younger age, those who had received "good information" were found to have better quality of life, lower mental pain, and higher mental pain tolerance than did those in the same group (diagnosed at a younger age) who received "not good information." By contrast, in the group diagnosed during adolescence, those who had received "not good information" scored higher on these measures than did their counterparts who had received "good information." CONCLUSION: Given that information conveyed to children diagnosed with cancer can have a significant impact on survivors' quality of life, further research is needed to determine the precise information to be divulged to children at the time of diagnosis. In the meantime, extreme caution, sensitivity, and careful judgment are required. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Findings of the current study and of future studies can be used to formulate clear guidelines for assessing a child's readiness and the information to be divulged, so as to improve the quality of life of CC survivors.
Entities:
Keywords:
childhood cancer; childhood cancer survivors; information; meaning; mental pain; quality of life
Authors: Wendy M Leisenring; Ann C Mertens; Gregory T Armstrong; Marilyn A Stovall; Joseph P Neglia; Jennifer Q Lanctot; John D Boice; John A Whitton; Yutaka Yasui Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-04-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Myung Ah Rhee; Kyong Mee Chung; Yuri Lee; Hana K Choi; Jung Woo Han; Hyo Sun Kim; Sun Hee Kim; Yoon Jung Shin; Chuhl Joo Lyu Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2014-05-11 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Micol E Gianinazzi; Corina S Rueegg; Laura Wengenroth; Eva Bergstraesser; Johannes Rischewski; Roland A Ammann; Claudia E Kuehni; Gisela Michel Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2013-02-11 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Melissa M Hudson; Ann C Mertens; Yutaka Yasui; Wendy Hobbie; Hegang Chen; James G Gurney; Mark Yeazel; Christopher J Recklitis; Neyssa Marina; Leslie R Robison; Kevin C Oeffinger Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-09-24 Impact factor: 157.335