Literature DB >> 27489838

Vertical Augmentation of Maxillary Posterior Alveolar Ridge Using Allogenic Block Bone Graft and Simultaneous Maxillary Sinus Graft.

Eun-Young Lee1, Eun-Suk Kim, Kyoung-Won Kim1.   

Abstract

The maxillary posterior area is the most challenging site for the dental implant. Although the sinus graft is a predictable and successful technique for rehabilitation of atrophic and pneumatized posterior maxilla, when there is severe destruction of alveolar bone, a very long crown length remains challenging after successful dental implants installation with sinus graft. We performed vertical augmentation of the maxillary posterior alveolar ridge using the allogenic block bone graft with a simultaneous sinus graft using allogenic and heterogenic bone chips. After about six months, we installed the dental implant. After this procedure, we achieved a more favorable crown-implant fixture ratio and better results clinically and biomechanically. This is a preliminary report of vertical augmentation of maxillary posterior alveolar ridge using allogenic block bone graft and simultaneous maxillary sinus graft. Further research requires longer observation and more patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Maxillary ridge augmentation; Sinus floor augmentations

Year:  2014        PMID: 27489838      PMCID: PMC4283529          DOI: 10.14402/jkamprs.2014.36.5.224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 2288-8101


  8 in total

1.  Histomorphometric analysis of natural bone mineral for maxillary sinus augmentation.

Authors:  Hans-Dieter John; Birgit Wenz
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Sinus floor augmentation with bovine hydroxyapatite mixed with fibrin glue and later placement of nonsubmerged implants: a retrospective study in 50 patients.

Authors:  Mats Hallman; Thomas Nordin
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 3.  Implant rehabilitation of the atrophic upper jaw: a review of the literature since 1999.

Authors:  Marco Sorní; Juan Guarinós; Oscar García; Miguel Peñarrocha
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2005-04-01

4.  Maxillary sinus augmentation as a risk factor for implant failure.

Authors:  Nancy E McDermott; Sung-Kiang Chuang; Valerie V Woo; Thomas B Dodson
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 5.  Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss or Bio-Oss mixed with autogenous bone as graft: a systematic review.

Authors:  Thomas Jensen; Søren Schou; Andreas Stavropoulos; Hendrik Terheyden; Palle Holmstrup
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 5.977

6.  Bone augmentation of the inferior floor of the maxillary sinus with autogenous bone or composite bone grafts: a histologic-histomorphometric preliminary report.

Authors:  M Lorenzetti; M Mozzati; P P Campanino; G Valente
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  A clinical study of the outcomes and complications associated with maxillary sinus augmentation.

Authors:  Antonio Barone; Stefano Santini; Ludovico Sbordone; Roberto Crespi; Ugo Covani
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 8.  Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement?

Authors:  Tara L Aghaloo; Peter K Moy
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.804

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  3D-Printed Ceramic Bone Scaffolds with Variable Pore Architectures.

Authors:  Ho-Kyung Lim; Seok-Jin Hong; Sun-Ju Byeon; Sung-Min Chung; Sung-Woon On; Byoung-Eun Yang; Jong-Ho Lee; Soo-Hwan Byun
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 5.923

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.