Literature DB >> 27489319

Midterm Results of Porous Tantalum Femoral Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

G David Potter1, Matthew P Abdel2, David G Lewallen3, Arlen D Hanssen4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Severe bone loss during a revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a challenging problem. The purpose of this study was to determine the midterm clinical outcomes, fixation as evaluated radiographically, and survivorship of tantalum femoral cones used during revision TKAs in patients with severe femoral bone loss.
METHODS: From 2003 to 2011, 159 tantalum metaphyseal femoral cones were implanted in 157 patients at a single institution. Knee Society scores, radiographic results, and implant survivorship were analyzed. Two patients were lost to follow-up. Nineteen died of causes unrelated to the surgery but had been followed for >2 years and thus were included in the study. The mean age at the time of the index surgery was 64 years, and 82 patients were male. The mean duration of follow-up was 5 years (range, 2 to 10 years).
RESULTS: The mean Knee Society score increased from 47 preoperatively to 65 at the most recent follow-up evaluation (p = 0.1). Radiographically, all 134 unrevised femoral cones were seen to be well fixed without any evidence of loosening. At 5 years, 23 cones had been revised: 14 because of infection, 6 because of aseptic loosening of the cone (all in hinged TKAs in patients with a Type-3 defect), and 3 because of ligamentous instability. The 5-year survivorship was 96% when the end point was revision of the cone due to aseptic loosening, 84% when it was revision of the cone for any reason, and 70% when it was any reoperation.
CONCLUSIONS: In what we believe to be the largest series of such implants, femoral cones provided a durable and reliable option for metaphyseal fixation during revision TKA with severe femoral bone loss. Aseptic failure of the femoral cone was associated with use of a hinged TKA in a patient with a Type-3 bone defect. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Copyright © 2016 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27489319     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  19 in total

1.  Metaphyseal cones and sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: Two sides of the same coin? Complications, clinical and radiological results-a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  A Zanirato; M Formica; L Cavagnaro; S Divano; G Burastero; L Felli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2019-03-16

2.  Revision total knee arthroplasty with porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves provides radiographic ingrowth and stable fixation.

Authors:  Catherine J Fedorka; Antonia F Chen; Michael R Pagnotto; Lawrence S Crossett; Brian A Klatt
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Medium term clinical outcomes of tibial cones in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Roger Erivan; Robert Tracey; Aurélien Mulliez; Guillaume Villatte; Wayne Paprosky
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 4.  Bone defect classifications in revision total knee arthroplasty, their reliability and utility: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yasim Khan; Sumit Arora; Abhishek Kashyap; Mohit Kumar Patralekh; Lalit Maini
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-07-03       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 5.  Metaphyseal cones and sleeves are similar in improving short- and mid-term outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty revisions.

Authors:  Umile Giuseppe Longo; Sergio De Salvatore; Giovanni Intermesoli; Francesco Pirato; Ilaria Piergentili; Roland Becker; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  [Bone defect management in revision knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  Eric Röhner; Markus Heinecke; Georg Matziolis
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Surgical Management of Tibial Bone Loss in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Clinical Outcomes and Radiographic Analysis of Tantalum Cones, Titanium Cones and Titanium Sleeves.

Authors:  Emmanuel Gibon; Terrie Vasilopoulos; Edvinas Sipavicius; Justin T Deen; Hernan A Prieto; Chancellor F Gray; Hari K Parvataneni; Luis Pulido
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2022-06

8.  Porous Tantalum Femoral Metaphyseal Cones for Large Femoral Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  O Brant Nikolaus; Matthew P Abdel; Arlen D Hanssen; David G Lewallen
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2017-06-14

9.  Facing metaphyseal bone stock defects: Mid- and longterm results of cones.

Authors:  Stephanie Kirschbaum; Carsten Perka; Clemens Gwinner
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-12-23

Review 10.  The Clinical Application of Porous Tantalum and Its New Development for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Gan Huang; Shu-Ting Pan; Jia-Xuan Qiu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.