Sarah P Psutka1,2, Mark Heidenreich3, Stephen A Boorjian1, George C Bailey1, John C Cheville4, Suzanne B Stewart-Merrill5, Christine M Lohse6, Thomas D Atwell7, Brian A Costello8, Bradley C Leibovich1, R Houston Thompson1. 1. Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 2. Division of Urology, John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL, USA. 3. Mayo Medical School, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 4. Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 5. Division of Urology, Penn State Milton S Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA. 6. Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 7. Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 8. Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinicopathological features associated with increased risk of renal fossa recurrence (RFR) after radical nephrectomy (RN) and to describe the prognostic features associated with cancer-specific survival (CSS) among patients with RFR treated with primary locally directed therapy, systemically directed therapy or expectant management. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of 2 502 patients treated with RN for unilateral, sporadic, localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) between 1970 and 2006 were reviewed. CSS after RFR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Associations with the development of RFR and CSS after RFR were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: A total of 33 (1.3%) patients developed isolated RFR (iRFR) and 30 (1.2%) patients developed RFR in the setting of synchronous metastases after RN (study cohort, N = 63). The median follow-up for the series was 9.0 years after RN and 6.0 years after RFR diagnosis. On multivariable analysis, advanced pathological stage (pT2: hazard ratio [HR] 4.36, P = 0.004; pT3/4: HR 4.39, P = 0.003) and coagulative necrosis (HR 2.71, P = 0.006) were independently associated with increased risk of iRFR. The median time to recurrence was 1.5 years after RN among the 33 patients with iRFR, and 1.4 years among all patients. Overall, the median CSS was 2.5 years after diagnosis of iRFR, 1.3 years after RFR in the setting of synchronous metastases, and 2.2 years overall. After primary locally directed therapy (surgery, ablation or radiation), systemic therapy or expectant management, the 3-year CSS rates among patients with iRFR were 63%, 50% and 13% (P = 0.001) and were 64%, 50% and 28% (P = 0.006) among all patients, respectively. On multivariable analysis, when compared with observation, locally directed therapies were associated with a significantly decreased risk of death from RCC (HR 0.26, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Renal fossa recurrence is a rare event after RN for RCC and portends a poor prognosis, even in the absence of synchronous metastases. Development of iRFR is associated with advanced stage and aggressive tumour biology. Patients who underwent primary locally directed therapy had superior CSS compared with those treated with expectant management, supporting the use of aggressive local treatment in carefully selected patients with RFR. Future research is needed to determine the optimum role and sequencing of combined therapy in patients with this rare entity.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinicopathological features associated with increased risk of renal fossa recurrence (RFR) after radical nephrectomy (RN) and to describe the prognostic features associated with cancer-specific survival (CSS) among patients with RFR treated with primary locally directed therapy, systemically directed therapy or expectant management. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of 2 502 patients treated with RN for unilateral, sporadic, localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) between 1970 and 2006 were reviewed. CSS after RFR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Associations with the development of RFR and CSS after RFR were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: A total of 33 (1.3%) patients developed isolated RFR (iRFR) and 30 (1.2%) patients developed RFR in the setting of synchronous metastases after RN (study cohort, N = 63). The median follow-up for the series was 9.0 years after RN and 6.0 years after RFR diagnosis. On multivariable analysis, advanced pathological stage (pT2: hazard ratio [HR] 4.36, P = 0.004; pT3/4: HR 4.39, P = 0.003) and coagulative necrosis (HR 2.71, P = 0.006) were independently associated with increased risk of iRFR. The median time to recurrence was 1.5 years after RN among the 33 patients with iRFR, and 1.4 years among all patients. Overall, the median CSS was 2.5 years after diagnosis of iRFR, 1.3 years after RFR in the setting of synchronous metastases, and 2.2 years overall. After primary locally directed therapy (surgery, ablation or radiation), systemic therapy or expectant management, the 3-year CSS rates among patients with iRFR were 63%, 50% and 13% (P = 0.001) and were 64%, 50% and 28% (P = 0.006) among all patients, respectively. On multivariable analysis, when compared with observation, locally directed therapies were associated with a significantly decreased risk of death from RCC (HR 0.26, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Renal fossa recurrence is a rare event after RN for RCC and portends a poor prognosis, even in the absence of synchronous metastases. Development of iRFR is associated with advanced stage and aggressive tumour biology. Patients who underwent primary locally directed therapy had superior CSS compared with those treated with expectant management, supporting the use of aggressive local treatment in carefully selected patients with RFR. Future research is needed to determine the optimum role and sequencing of combined therapy in patients with this rare entity.
Authors: Wassim Kassouf; Leonardo L Monteiro; Darrel E Drachenberg; Adrian S Fairey; Antonio Finelli; Anil Kapoor; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Michael J Leveridge; Nicholas E Power; Frederic Pouliot; Ricardo A Rendon; Robert Sabbagh; Alan I So; Simon Tanguay; Rodney H Breau Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2018-05-31 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Ziho Lee; Opeyemi A Jegede; Naomi B Haas; Michael R Pins; Edward M Messing; Judith Manola; Christopher G Wood; Christopher J Kane; Michael A S Jewett; Keith T Flaherty; Janice P Dutcher; Robert S DiPaola; Robert G Uzzo Journal: J Urol Date: 2019-10-09 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Michele Marchioni; Petros Sountoulides; Maria Furlan; Maria Carmen Mir; Lucia Aretano; Jose Rubio-Briones; Mario Alvarez-Maestro; Marta Di Nicola; Alfredo Aguilera Bazán; Alessandro Antonelli; Claudio Simeone; Luigi Schips Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2021-08-21 Impact factor: 2.370