Jacopo Giuliani1,2, Andrea Bonetti3,4. 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Mater Salutis Hospital, AULSS 21 della Regione Veneto, Legnago, VR, Italy. giuliani.jacopo@alice.it. 2. Department of Medical Oncology, ASL 21 della Regione Veneto, Via Gianella 1, 37045, Legnago, VR, Italy. giuliani.jacopo@alice.it. 3. Department of Medical Oncology, Mater Salutis Hospital, AULSS 21 della Regione Veneto, Legnago, VR, Italy. 4. Department of Medical Oncology, ASL 21 della Regione Veneto, Via Gianella 1, 37045, Legnago, VR, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacological costs of conversion chemotherapy with targeted biological agents in an unselected population of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in order to achieve an R0 liver resection. METHODS: Full reports and updates of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared at least two front-line therapy regimens with targeted biological agents for advanced CRC patients were selected. The present evaluation was restricted to randomized phase II and III trials. The costs of drugs are at the Pharmacy Hospital and are expressed in euros (€). RESULTS: Our study began with the evaluation of 683 abstracts. Forty-eight trials were considered appropriate for further analysis. A more in-depth evaluation looking for the trials reporting the liver resection rates following conversion chemotherapy brought to the exclusion of other 37 trials, leaving 11 randomized trials (three phase II trials, including 522 patients and eight phase III trials, including 7191 patients). The pharmacological costs of conversion therapy increased with the substitution of prolonged infusion 5-Fluorouracil by capecitabine and, to a much higher extent, with the introduction of biologicals. CONCLUSIONS: Two key issues are presented in this review. First, the pharmacological costs of commonly used front line regimens based on the targeted biological agents for the treatment of advanced CRC are highly variable. Second, the performance of the published schemes, in terms of resection rates, depends on patient's selection, tumor characteristics, and on the type of the scheme.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacological costs of conversion chemotherapy with targeted biological agents in an unselected population of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in order to achieve an R0 liver resection. METHODS: Full reports and updates of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared at least two front-line therapy regimens with targeted biological agents for advanced CRCpatients were selected. The present evaluation was restricted to randomized phase II and III trials. The costs of drugs are at the Pharmacy Hospital and are expressed in euros (€). RESULTS: Our study began with the evaluation of 683 abstracts. Forty-eight trials were considered appropriate for further analysis. A more in-depth evaluation looking for the trials reporting the liver resection rates following conversion chemotherapy brought to the exclusion of other 37 trials, leaving 11 randomized trials (three phase II trials, including 522 patients and eight phase III trials, including 7191 patients). The pharmacological costs of conversion therapy increased with the substitution of prolonged infusion 5-Fluorouracil by capecitabine and, to a much higher extent, with the introduction of biologicals. CONCLUSIONS: Two key issues are presented in this review. First, the pharmacological costs of commonly used front line regimens based on the targeted biological agents for the treatment of advanced CRC are highly variable. Second, the performance of the published schemes, in terms of resection rates, depends on patient's selection, tumor characteristics, and on the type of the scheme.
Entities:
Keywords:
Advanced colorectal cancer; Costs of drugs; First-line chemotherapy; Randomized phase II and phase III trials; Targeted biological therapies
Authors: Bernard Nordlinger; Eric Van Cutsem; Philippe Rougier; Claus-Henning Köhne; Marc Ychou; Alberto Sobrero; Rene Adam; Dag Arvidsson; Alfredo Carrato; Vassilis Georgoulias; Felice Giuliante; Bengt Glimelius; Markus Golling; Thomas Gruenberger; Josep Tabernero; Harpreet Wasan; Graeme Poston Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2007-09-04 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: René Adam; Gerard Pascal; Denis Castaing; Daniel Azoulay; Valerie Delvart; Bernard Paule; Francis Levi; Henri Bismuth Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: C Garufi; A Torsello; S Tumolo; G M Ettorre; M Zeuli; C Campanella; G Vennarecci; M Mottolese; I Sperduti; F Cognetti Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-10-19 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Gunnar Folprecht; Thomas Gruenberger; Wolf O Bechstein; Hans-Rudolf Raab; Florian Lordick; Jörg T Hartmann; Hauke Lang; Andrea Frilling; Jan Stoehlmacher; Jürgen Weitz; Ralf Konopke; Christian Stroszczynski; Torsten Liersch; Detlev Ockert; Thomas Herrmann; Eray Goekkurt; Fabio Parisi; Claus-Henning Köhne Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2009-11-26 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: James S Tomlinson; William R Jarnagin; Ronald P DeMatteo; Yuman Fong; Peter Kornprat; Mithat Gonen; Nancy Kemeny; Murray F Brennan; Leslie H Blumgart; Michael D'Angelica Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-10-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Leonard B Saltz; Stephen Clarke; Eduardo Díaz-Rubio; Werner Scheithauer; Arie Figer; Ralph Wong; Sheryl Koski; Mikhail Lichinitser; Tsai-Shen Yang; Fernando Rivera; Felix Couture; Florin Sirzén; Jim Cassidy Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-04-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Herbert Hurwitz; Louis Fehrenbacher; William Novotny; Thomas Cartwright; John Hainsworth; William Heim; Jordan Berlin; Ari Baron; Susan Griffing; Eric Holmgren; Napoleone Ferrara; Gwen Fyfe; Beth Rogers; Robert Ross; Fairooz Kabbinavar Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-06-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M Ychou; F Viret; A Kramar; F Desseigne; E Mitry; R Guimbaud; J R Delpero; M Rivoire; F Quénet; G Portier; B Nordlinger Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2007-09-28 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Brandon N VanderVeen; Alexander T Sougiannis; Kandy T Velazquez; James A Carson; Daping Fan; E Angela Murphy Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2020-12-07 Impact factor: 4.566