Literature DB >> 27488299

Molecular Markers and Targeted Therapeutics in Metastatic Tumors of the Spine: Changing the Treatment Paradigms.

C Rory Goodwin1, Nancy Abu-Bonsrah, Laurence D Rhines, Jorrit-Jan Verlaan, Mark H Bilsky, Ilya Laufer, Stefano Boriani, Daniel M Sciubba, Chetan Bettegowda.   

Abstract

STUDY TYPE: A review of the literature.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to discuss the evolution of molecular signatures and the history and development of targeted therapeutics in metastatic tumor types affecting the spinal column. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Molecular characterization of metastatic spine tumors is expected to usher in a revolution in diagnostic and treatment paradigms. Molecular characterization will provide critical information that can be used for initial diagnosis, prognosticating the ideal treatment strategy, assessment of treatment efficacy, surveillance and monitoring recurrence, and predicting complications, clinical outcome, and overall survival in patients diagnosed with metastatic cancers to the spinal column.
METHODS: A review of the literature was performed focusing on illustrative examples of the role that molecular-based therapeutics have played in clinical outcomes for patients diagnosed with metastatic tumor types affecting the spinal column.
RESULTS: The impact of molecular therapeutics including receptor tyrosine kinases and immune checkpoint inhibitors and the ability of molecular signatures to provide prognostic information are discussed in metastatic breast cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer, melanoma, and renal cell cancer affecting the spinal column.
CONCLUSION: For the providers who will ultimately counsel patients diagnosed with metastases to the spinal column, molecular advancements will radically alter the management/surgical paradigms utilized. Ultimately, the translation of these molecular advancements into routine clinical care will greatly improve the quality and quantity of life for patients diagnosed with spinal malignancies and provide better overall outcomes and counseling for treating physicians. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27488299     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  9 in total

1.  Prognostic Significance of a Novel Score Model Based on Preoperative Indicators in Patients with Breast Cancer Spine Metastases (BCSM).

Authors:  Chenglong Zhao; Yao Wang; Xiaopan Cai; Wei Xu; Dongsheng Wang; Ting Wang; Qi Jia; Haiyi Gong; Haitao Sun; Zhipeng Wu; Jianru Xiao
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 2.  Separation surgery for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression: A qualitative review.

Authors:  Giuseppe Di Perna; Fabio Cofano; Cristina Mantovani; Serena Badellino; Nicola Marengo; Marco Ajello; Ludovico Maria Comite; Giuseppe Palmieri; Fulvio Tartara; Francesco Zenga; Umberto Ricardi; Diego Garbossa
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2020-09-26       Impact factor: 4.072

3.  Transpedicular 3D endoscope-assisted thoracic corpectomy for separation surgery in spinal metastases: feasibility of the technique and preliminary results of a promising experience.

Authors:  Fabio Cofano; Giuseppe Di Perna; Nicola Marengo; Marco Ajello; Antonio Melcarne; Francesco Zenga; Diego Garbossa
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Metastatic Spine Disease: Should Patients With Short Life Expectancy Be Denied Surgical Care? An International Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Nicolas Dea; Anne L Versteeg; Arjun Sahgal; Jorrit-Jan Verlaan; Raphaële Charest-Morin; Laurence D Rhines; Daniel M Sciubba; James M Schuster; Michael H Weber; Aron Lazary; Michael G Fehlings; Michelle J Clarke; Paul M Arnold; Stefano Boriani; Chetan Bettegowda; Ilya Laufer; Ziya L Gokaslan; Charles G Fisher
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  [Usefulness of minimally invasive spine surgery for the management of thoracolumbar spinal metastases].

Authors:  Santiago Hem; Sofía Beltrame; Jorge Rasmussen; Eduardo Vecchi; Federico Landriel; Claudio Yampolsky
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2019-02-15

6.  Essential Concepts for the Management of Metastatic Spine Disease: What the Surgeon Should Know and Practice.

Authors:  Ori Barzilai; Stefano Boriani; Charles G Fisher; Arjun Sahgal; Jorrit Jan Verlaan; Ziya L Gokaslan; Aron Lazary; Chetan Bettegowda; Laurence D Rhines; Ilya Laufer
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-05-08

7.  Attitudes and trends in the use of radiolucent spinal implants: A survey of the North American Spine Society section of spinal oncology.

Authors:  Athan G Zavras; Andrew J Schoenfeld; Joshua C Patt; Mohammed A Munim; C Rory Goodwin; Matthew L Goodwin; Sheng-Fu Larry Lo; Kristin J Redmond; Daniel G Tobert; John H Shin; Marco L Ferrone; Ilya Laufer; Comron Saifi; Jacob M Buchowski; Jack W Jennings; Ali K Ozturk; Christina Huang-Wright; Addisu Mesfin; Chris Steyn; Wesley Hsu; Hesham M Soliman; Ajit A Krishnaney; Daniel M Sciubba; Joseph H Schwab; Matthew W Colman
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2022-02-23

Review 8.  The Challenges of Renal Cell Carcinoma Metastatic to the Spine: A Systematic Review of Survival and Treatment.

Authors:  C Rory Goodwin; A Karim Ahmed; Christine Boone; Nancy Abu-Bonsrah; Risheng Xu; Niccole Germscheid; Daryl R Fourney; Michelle Clarke; Ilya Laufer; Charles G Fisher; Chetan Bettegowda; Daniel M Sciubba
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-11-20

9.  The Targeted Therapies Era Beyond the Surgical Point of View: What Spine Surgeons Should Know Before Approaching Spinal Metastases.

Authors:  Fabio Cofano; Matteo Monticelli; Marco Ajello; Francesco Zenga; Nicola Marengo; Giuseppe Di Perna; Roberto Altieri; Paola Cassoni; Luca Bertero; Antonio Melcarne; Fulvio Tartara; Alessandro Ducati; Diego Garbossa
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.