Maria Browall1,2, Christina Forsberg2, Yvonne Wengström2,3. 1. School of Health and Education, University of Skövde, Skövde, Sweden. 2. Division of Nursing, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. 3. Breast and Sarcoma Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Radiumhemmet, Sweden.
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To explore how interventions using nurse-led follow-up in breast cancer care have been evaluated with a focus on patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness. BACKGROUND: As part of the advancement of breast care, nurse-led follow-up is increasingly used as an alternative to routine hospital follow-up in outpatient clinics. There is evidence suggesting that patients appear to be satisfied with the nurse-led follow-up, but there is a lack of evidence of whether this perception equates to patients' satisfaction with the model of physician-led follow-up. DESIGN: Systematic review. METHOD: Three databases were searched, and 29 RCT were initially screened. Finally, 13 articles were critically appraised. Searches included articles between 2005-2013. The quality of appraisal assessment was inspired by the GRADE system. RESULTS: The results show that there are many different instruments used when evaluating nurse-led follow-up, which makes it difficult to compare the studies. Several of the studies used QoL as an outcome measure; this is a broad concept that includes several aspects ranging from social role and psychosocial issues to symptoms and therefore difficult to use as an outcome measure. Only two of the studies made any cost-effective analyses, and the results are hard to interpret. CONCLUSIONS: Nurse-led follow-up can potentially result in better continuity of care and the availability of more time to provide psychosocial support and address patients' information needs. However, more well-conducted research is needed before equivalence to physician-led follow-up can be assessed in terms of survival, recurrence, patient well-being and cost-effectiveness. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Results from well-conducted evaluation studies of nurse-led services based on theory are needed so that relevant interventions can be implemented in clinical practice. There is a need to in future studies include cost-effectiveness analyses to compare nurse-led services with other types of follow-up.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To explore how interventions using nurse-led follow-up in breast cancer care have been evaluated with a focus on patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness. BACKGROUND: As part of the advancement of breast care, nurse-led follow-up is increasingly used as an alternative to routine hospital follow-up in outpatient clinics. There is evidence suggesting that patients appear to be satisfied with the nurse-led follow-up, but there is a lack of evidence of whether this perception equates to patients' satisfaction with the model of physician-led follow-up. DESIGN: Systematic review. METHOD: Three databases were searched, and 29 RCT were initially screened. Finally, 13 articles were critically appraised. Searches included articles between 2005-2013. The quality of appraisal assessment was inspired by the GRADE system. RESULTS: The results show that there are many different instruments used when evaluating nurse-led follow-up, which makes it difficult to compare the studies. Several of the studies used QoL as an outcome measure; this is a broad concept that includes several aspects ranging from social role and psychosocial issues to symptoms and therefore difficult to use as an outcome measure. Only two of the studies made any cost-effective analyses, and the results are hard to interpret. CONCLUSIONS: Nurse-led follow-up can potentially result in better continuity of care and the availability of more time to provide psychosocial support and address patients' information needs. However, more well-conducted research is needed before equivalence to physician-led follow-up can be assessed in terms of survival, recurrence, patient well-being and cost-effectiveness. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Results from well-conducted evaluation studies of nurse-led services based on theory are needed so that relevant interventions can be implemented in clinical practice. There is a need to in future studies include cost-effectiveness analyses to compare nurse-led services with other types of follow-up.
Authors: Olena Mandrik; Obinna Ikechukwu Ekwunife; Filip Meheus; Johan L Hans Severens; Stefan Lhachimi; Carin A Uyl-de Groot; Raul Murillo Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2019-09-30 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: Michael Jefford; Doris Howell; Qiuping Li; Karolina Lisy; Jane Maher; Catherine M Alfano; Meg Rynderman; Jon Emery Journal: Lancet Date: 2022-04-16 Impact factor: 202.731
Authors: Oskar Bergengren; Helena Kaihola; Ann-Charlotte Borgefeldt; Eva Johansson; Hans Garmo; Anna Bill-Axelson Journal: Eur Urol Open Sci Date: 2022-02-12