| Literature DB >> 27487195 |
Friedrich W Meyer1, Nadine Schubert2, Karen Diele3,4, Mirta Teichberg1, Christian Wild1,5, Susana Enríquez2.
Abstract
Coral reefs worldwide are affected by increasing dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) and organic carbon (DOC) concentrations due to ocean acidification (OA) and coastal eutrophication. These two stressors can occur simultaneously, particularly in near-shore reef environments with increasing anthropogenic pressure. However, experimental studies on how elevated DIC and DOC interact are scarce and fundamental to understanding potential synergistic effects and foreseeing future changes in coral reef function. Using an open mesocosm experiment, the present study investigated the impact of elevated DIC (pHNBS: 8.2 and 7.8; pCO2: 377 and 1076 μatm) and DOC (added as 833 μmol L-1 of glucose) on calcification and photosynthesis rates of two common calcifying green algae, Halimeda incrassata and Udotea flabellum, in a shallow reef environment. Our results revealed that under elevated DIC, algal photosynthesis decreased similarly for both species, but calcification was more affected in H. incrassata, which also showed carbonate dissolution rates. Elevated DOC reduced photosynthesis and calcification rates in H. incrassata, while in U. flabellum photosynthesis was unaffected and thalus calcification was severely impaired. The combined treatment showed an antagonistic effect of elevated DIC and DOC on the photosynthesis and calcification rates of H. incrassata, and an additive effect in U. flabellum. We conclude that the dominant sand dweller H. incrassata is more negatively affected by both DIC and DOC enrichments, but that their impact could be mitigated when they occur simultaneously. In contrast, U. flabellum can be less affected in coastal eutrophic waters by elevated DIC, but its contribution to reef carbonate sediment production could be further reduced. Accordingly, while the capacity of environmental eutrophication to exacerbate the impact of OA on algal-derived carbonate sand production seems to be species-specific, significant reductions can be expected under future OA scenarios, with important consequences for beach erosion and coastal sediment dynamics.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27487195 PMCID: PMC4972524 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160268
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Variation in the experimental conditions.
Values for the carbonate system parameters were calculated using CO2SYS with temperature, salinity, total alkalinity (TA) and pHNBS as input parameters (n = 3). Additionally, the Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) of the seawater in each treatment are given, determined through oxygen consumption using dark incubations over 24 h and referring the estimated changes to the water volume of the incubation (n = 3). Data represent mean ± SD (n = 6) and the results of a one-way ANOVA (p<0.05) performed to determine significant differences in BOD between treatments, are indicated by different letters.
| Treatment | pH [NBS] | DOC (μmol L-1) | T°C | Salinity (ppt) | TA (μmol kgSW-1) | HCO3 (μmolkg SW-1) | ΩAr | BOD (mg O2 L-1 h-1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 8.22 ±0.02 | 171 | 28.1±0.1 | 35.9 ±0.1 | 2414 ±8 | 377 ±27 | 1776 ±26 | 4.2 ±0.2 | 0.63 ±0.6a |
| High DIC | 7.84 ±0.04 | 171 | 28.0±0.2 | 36 ±0.1 | 2409 ±6 | 1076 ±101 | 2097 ±24 | 2.0 ±0.1 | 1.03 ±0.3a |
| High DOC | 8.19 ±0.03 | 550 | 28.1±0.2 | 35.9 ±0.1 | 2414 ±8 | 415 ±31 | 1811 ±31 | 4.0 ±0.2 | 1.35 ±0.3a |
| High DOC & DIC | 7.82 ±0.02 | 550 | 28.0±0.1 | 36 ±0.1 | 2413 ±7 | 1135 ±55 | 2114 ±14 | 2.0 ±0.1 | 1.62 ±0.4a |
Fig 1DOC concentrations in the high DOC-treatments measured during a 12-hour cycle, from 8:00 a.m. to 20:00 pm, after addition of 833 μmol L-1 DOC as glucose (indicated by an arrow).
Filled-solid circles represent the average of two sampling points (n = 2) of the high DOC-treatments, and the open-white circle indicates the ambient DOC concentration in the non-DOC-enriched treatments.
Comparison of the initial values (day 0) of gross maximum photosynthetic rates (Pmax), post-illumination respiration (RL), maximum calcification rates (Gmax), and the ratio of calcification:photosynthesis (Gmax:Pmax) of Halimeda incrassata and Udotea flabellum.
Data represent mean ± SE (n = 6) and significant differences between species (one-way ANOVA, p<0.05) are indicated by different letters.
| Metabolic rates | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pmax | 2.33±0.08a | 1.56±0.06b |
| RL | 0.39±0.02a | 0.47±0.05a |
| Gmax | 1.32±0.2a | 0.40±0.16b |
| Gmax:Pmax | 0.57±0.08a | 0.25±0.07b |
Fig 2Photosynthetic responses of H. incrassata (a, c, e) and U. flabellum (b, d, f) to the experimental DIC and DOC treatments.
(a, b) Daily variation in the maximum quantum efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) along the experiment and the corresponding daily integrated values in light exposure in mol quanta m-2 day-1 (grey bars); (c, d) Fv/Fm for each treatment at the end of the experiment; and (e, f) gross photosynthesis, Pmax, (light grey bars) and respiration, RL, (black bars) rates at the end of the experiment. Data represent mean ± SE (n = 3) and significant differences between treatments (ANOVA, Newman-Keuls, p<0.05) are indicated by different superscript letters.
Two-way ANOVA analyses performed to determine significant differences in the physiological responses of the apical segments of Halimeda incrassata and Udotea flabellum exposed to four experimental treatments: control, high DIC concentration, high DOC concentration, and the combined treatment (n = 3 for each treatment).
DIC and DOC were considered fixed factors and DIC x DOC show the interaction between both factors.
| Response variable | Species | Source of variation | DF | SS | MS | F-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum quantum yield (Fv/Fm) | DIC | 1 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.69 | 0.4275 | |
| DOC | 1 | 0.0121 | 0.0121 | 16.36 | 0.0037* | ||
| DIC x DOC | 1 | 0.0011 | 0.0011 | 1.45 | 0.2632 | ||
| Residual | 8 | 0.0059 | 0.0007 | ||||
| DIC | 1 | 0.0104 | 0.0104 | 5.85 | 0.0419* | ||
| DOC | 1 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 | 0.33 | 0.5790 | ||
| DIC x DOC | 1 | 0.0093 | 0.0093 | 5.21 | 0.0519 | ||
| Residual | 8 | 0.0142 | 0.0018 | ||||
| Gross | DIC | 1 | 0.162 | 0.162 | 6.267 | 0.0368* | |
| Photosynthesis (Pmax) | DOC | 1 | 0.863 | 0.863 | 33.37 | 0.00042* | |
| DIC x DOC | 1 | 0.590 | 0.590 | 22.82 | 0.00140* | ||
| Residual | 8 | 0.207 | 0.026 | ||||
| DIC | 1 | 0.232 | 0.232 | 25.96 | 0.0009* | ||
| DOC | 1 | 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.68 | 0.4349 | ||
| DIC x DOC | 1 | 0.027 | 0.027 | 2.99 | 0.1222 | ||
| Residual | 8 | 0.071 | 0.009 | ||||
| Respiration (RL) | DIC | 1 | 0.0043 | 0.0043 | 1.10 | 0.3253 | |
| DOC | 1 | 0.0039 | 0.0039 | 0.98 | 0.3506 | ||
| DIC x DOC | 1 | 0.0048 | 0.0048 | 1.21 | 0.3034 | ||
| Residual | 8 | 0.0316 | 0.0039 | ||||
| DIC | 1 | 0.0061 | 0.0061 | 1.14 | 0.3171 | ||
| DOC | 1 | 0.0016 | 0.0016 | 0.30 | 0.5987 | ||
| DIC x DOC | 1 | 0.0010 | 0.0010 | 0.19 | 0.6689 | ||
| Residual | 8 | 0.0425 | 0.0053 | ||||
| Light calcification (Gmax) | DIC | 1 | 1.16 | 1.16 | 23.33 | 0.0013* | |
| DOC | 1 | 0.495 | 0.495 | 9.98 | |||
| DIC x DOC | 1 | 4.38 | 4.38 | 88.28 | |||
| Residual | 8 | 0.397 | 0.0496 | ||||
| DIC | 1 | 0.018 | 0.018 | 6.184 | |||
| DOC | 1 | 0.399 | 0.399 | 140.94 | |||
| DIC x DOC | 1 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.778 | 0.4034 | ||
| Residual | 8 | 0.023 | 0.0028 |
Significant results (p<0.05) are marked in bold and with an asterisk (*).
Fig 3Calcification (Gmax) response of H. incrassata (a) and U. flabellum (b) to the experimental DIC and DOC treatments. Data represent mean ± SE (n = 3) and significant differences between treatments (ANOVA, Newman-Keuls, p<0.05) are indicated by different letters.