Isabel Ortiz de Solorzano1,2, Martín Prieto1,2, Gracia Mendoza1,2, Teresa Alejo1,2, Silvia Irusta1,2, Victor Sebastian1,2, Manuel Arruebo1,2. 1. Department of Chemical Engineering, Aragon Institute of Nanoscience (INA), University of Zaragoza , Campus Río Ebro-Edificio I+D, c/Poeta Mariano Esquillor s/n, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain. 2. Networking Research Center on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN) , 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Abstract
The continuous synthesis of biodegradable photothermal copper sulfide nanoparticles has been carried out with the aid of a microfluidic platform. A comparative physicochemical characterization of the resulting products from the microreactor and from a conventional batch reactor has been performed. The microreactor is able to operate in a continuous manner and with a 4-fold reduction in the synthesis times compared to that of the conventional batch reactor producing nanoparticles with the same physicochemical requirements. Biodegradation subproducts obtained under simulated physiological conditions have been identified, and a complete cytotoxicological analysis on different cell lines was performed. The photothermal effect of those nanomaterials has been demonstrated in vitro as well as their ability to generate reactive oxygen species.
The continuous synthesis of biodegradable photothermal copper sulfide nanoparticles has been carried out with the aid of a microfluidic platform. A comparative physicochemical characterization of the resulting products from the microreactor and from a conventional batch reactor has been performed. The microreactor is able to operate in a continuous manner and with a 4-fold reduction in the synthesis times compared to that of the conventional batch reactor producing nanoparticles with the same physicochemical requirements. Biodegradation subproducts obtained under simulated physiological conditions have been identified, and a complete cytotoxicological analysis on different cell lines was performed. The photothermal effect of those nanomaterials has been demonstrated in vitro as well as their ability to generate reactive oxygen species.
Copper(II) sulfide nanoparticles are semiconductor
chalcogenides with unique electronic and optical properties. As semiconductor,
the bandgap of copper sulfide varies depending on its atomic composition
between 1.2 eV for Cu2S to 2.0 eV for CuS, which allows
it to absorb a large fraction of the solar spectrum.[1] As plasmonic material, it absorbs near-infrared (NIR) light
converting it into heat due to the excitation of direct (band-to-band)
transitions, indirect transitions, and plasmonic photoexcitation.[2] Those electro-optical properties make copper
sulfide nanoparticles useful in not only photovoltaic cells but also
a wide variety of biomedical applications including electrochemical
sensing,[3] photothermal therapy,[4,5] diagnosis,[6] theragnosis,[7,8] and combination therapies.[9,10]In the biomedical
field, photothermal therapy using plasmonic nanoparticles has reached
clinical trials. Thus, PEGylated gold nanoparticles surface functionalized
with TNF-target molecules and containing a therapeutic payload is
going to be used in a phase II clinical trial for the treatment of
non-small-cell lung cancerpatients in combination with standard-of-care
second-line therapy.[11] Plasmonic gold nanoshells
(SiO2/Au) are also undergoing different clinical trials
in patients with refractory and/or recurrent tumors of the head and
neck, with primary and/or metastatic lung tumors, and in the treatment
of prostate disease.[12] However, in those
applications, tissue light penetration is reduced. Short-wave visible
light penetrates typical biological tissues between 0.5 and 2.5 mm
where upon it undergoes an exponential decrease of intensity,[13] whereas NIR light can penetrate deeper into
the tissues.[14] But even in the water window,
where water, melanin, and hemoglobin show a reduced light absorption,
the scattering of the light passing through regions having different
refractive indexes (i.e., cell membranes, vessel walls, etc.) limits
light penetration into the biological tissues; consequently, in most
of those clinical applications, the activating light is conducted
to the tumoral mass guided by an optical fiber in an invasive manner.
Therefore, the design of nanoparticles with enhanced absorption and
with response at wavelengths with reduced photon scattering[14] can potentially be applied deeper in the tissues.Biodegradability and higher photothermal conversion efficiencies
(∼22–60%)[2] are some of the
main advantages of CuS nanoparticles (NPs) when used in vivo compared
to gold-based plasmonic nanoparticles. Thus, Guo et al.[15] demonstrated that using similar injected doses
plasmonic hollow gold nanoparticles remained in the body one month
after injection in BALB/c mice at high levels (more than 96% of the
injected dose) whereas during the same time period only 10% of the
injected dose remained in the animals when using CuS NPs being mostly
excreted following the hepatobiliary route. The same authors demonstrated
that the polycrystalline CuS NPs disintegrate from CuS shells into
single CuS crystals after laser treatment, but in those works, the
biodegradation subproducts were not evaluated.[9] Other carbon-based nanoparticles used in photothermal therapy such
as carbon nanotubes or graphene oxide have shown large physiological
persistence[16,17] despite the identification of
some biodegradation cellular routes.[18] Upconversion
nanoparticles have also been used in photothermal therapy,[19] but again, biopersistence in the mononuclear
phagocyte system is the major hurdle for their clinical translation
unless they are produced in reduced sizes allowing renal excretion.[20] In addition, Goodman et al.[21] demonstrated how hollow gold plasmonic nanoparticles show
instability and fragmentation in vivo, which could be potentially
attributable to the remaining silver on the surface of the gold nanoparticles
used for their synthesis, and concluded that new biocompatible plasmonic
nanoparticles appropriate for nanomedicine are required. In addition,
it has been demonstrated that the combination of CuS nanoparticles
with other plasmonic metal nanoparticles can enhance the photothermal
effect.[22]Polydispersity, low yield,
and batch-to-batch inconsistencies are the main shortcomings when
synthesizing nanoparticles, which can be overcome by using continuous-flow
microfluidic reactors. Comparative syntheses of polymers, metals,
and oxides using conventional batch reactors or microreactors have
demonstrated a superior performance of the latter thanks to the use
of confined growth in the microchannels driven by molecular diffusion
under reduced concentration and temperature gradients. Combinatorial
synthesis,[23] multistep microfluidic platforms,[24] and on-line monitoring with feedback control
to render a product with specific properties[25] are also possible using microfluidics. Some of the nanoparticles
produced using microfluidics are obtained in passive or active micromixers
where no chemical reaction is needed, just controlling the self-assembly
of precursors under the presence of surfactants or stabilizers to
form polymeric nanoemulsions,[26] nanoprecipitated
particles,[27] liposomal formulations,[28] solid–lipid nanoparticles,[29] micelles,[30] niosomes,[31] and so on.Photothermal nanoparticles
have also been produced in microfluidic reactors. In this regard,
redox reactions using sacrificial templates in a galvanic replacement
have been used to produce hollow gold nanoparticles.[24] Seeded or unseeded synthesis of anisotropic gold nanoparticles
have also been reported by using capping agents and surface passivation
components (i.e., halides), which adsorb preferentially on specific
crystal facets directing the formation of gold nanorods during the
growth.[32,33] Gold nanoshells can also be prepared using
sequential microfluidic platforms with significant time savings and
with an improved control over the product properties compared to a
conventional batch processing operation.[34] Recently, Cheung et al.[35] have described
the millifluidic synthesis of copper sulfide nanoparticles using organic
solvents and surfactants to control the geometry and crystalline phase.
In this work, we have developed a microfluidic platform for the continuous
synthesis of CuS NPs in aqueous media and identified their biodegradation
subproducts under physiological conditions. Subcytotoxic doses of
those nanoparticles have also been evaluated colorimetrically and
by using flow cytometry.
Results and Discussion
Nanoparticles Synthesis
Copper sulfide can vary its optoelectronic properties depending
on its stoichiometry from covellite (CuS) to djurleite (Cu1.97S), digenite (Cu1.8S), anilite (Cu1.4S), and
chalcocite (Cu2S). Independent of the synthesis method,
the maximum in the extinction spectrum in the NIR region at 1050 nm
is reached for covellite. However, the other crystalline phases show
minimal absorption at those wavelengths, and the maximum plasmon resonance
wavelength decreases with increasing x in Cu2–S.[36] This
maximum is attributed to an in-plane dipolar-localized surface plasmon
resonant mode.[37] In photothermal therapy,
NIR-absorbing materials are needed to take advantage of the reduced
absorption and scattering of biological chromophores, hemoglobin,
and water in that region. Therefore, the morphology and absorption
spectra of the resulting nanoparticles prepared in both microfluidic
and batch reactors at different temperatures were analyzed in order
to compare their morphological and optical properties. The nanoparticles
synthesized in the batch reactor (Figure ) show absorbance in the NIR region and crystallinity.
XRD analysis showed that the materials synthesized at 60 °C show
the characteristic diffraction planes of the covellite phase, but
the full width at half-maximum of the diffraction peaks decreased
at higher 120 °C indicative of an increased crystallinity (Figure g). Figure a,b shows the morphology of
the sacrificial Cu2O nanoparticles. Cu2O nanoparticles
have a spongelike morphology, but the EDS profile shows that the Cu
distribution across the nanoparticle is homogeneous (Figure c). CuS nanoparticles produced
after sulfur addition evidence the formation of hollow nanostructures
with a thin shell (∼40 nm) (Figure d,e). The hollow structure was confirmed
by the EDS analysis across a particle (Figure f). This EDS profile shows higher concentrations
in the external area (corresponding to the particle walls), and lower
concentrations in the central area, with upper and lower walls observed
through the empty “core” of the particle. EDS analysis
of CuS nanoparticles prepared in the batch reactor unveiled that the
Cu/S atomic ratio was close to 1 when the synthesis temperature increased
from 60 °C (Cu/S = 1.27 ± 0.1) to 120 °C (Cu/S = 0.97
± 0.1) (Figure i). This fact also confirms that covellite was obtained during the
batch synthesis production but with a higher purity and crystallinity
as the synthesis temperature was increased. This was corroborated
by the UV–vis absorption spectra where higher absorbances at
the same concentration were obtained for the materials synthesized
at 120 °C. XPS analysis revealed that the oxidation state of
the CuS was +1 (see Table S1) in agreement
with the previous literature.[38] This hard-template-assisted
technique using Cu2O nanoparticles produced hollow CuS
nanoparticles based on a Kirkendall diffusion effect. Sulfur diffuses
into the Cu2O template particles at the same time that
the copper diffuses outward but at a slower rate. Thereby the nonreciprocal
diffusion between Cu and S ultimately renders the formation of an
interior cavity. Usually those processes are slow (several to tens
of hours under hydrothermal or annealing conditions),[39] and microfluidics can overcome those limitations. In agreement
with the previous literature,[40] an overall
size increase was observed due to the Kirkendall effect varying the
size from 198 ± 37 nm for the initial Cu2O nanoparticles
to the final 208 ± 34 nm obtained for the resulting CuS nanoparticles
obtained in the batch reactor at 60 °C during 2 h. The hydrodynamic
size of those CuS nanoparticles (measured by DLS) was 164.1 nm.
Figure 1
Physico-chemical
characterization of the CuS NPs synthesized in the batch reactor after
2 h of synthesis. STEM-HAADF photographs of the resulting nanoparticles
(60 °C, 2 h): (a) sacrificial Cu2O nanoparticles;
(b) detail image of a Cu2O nanoparticle. (c) Cu EDS profile
of the particle in b. Red dashed line depicts the location of the
EDS profile. (d) CuS nanoparticles produced by Kirkendall diffusion.
(e) Detailed image of a hollow CuS nanoparticle. (f) Cu EDS profile
of the particle in e. Red dashed line in e depicts the location of
the EDS profile. (g) X-ray diffractograms of the materials obtained
at different temperatures (60 and 120 °C) and the characteristic
covellite and chalcocite Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards
(JCPDS) patterns; (h) UV–vis absorption spectra of the materials
synthesized in both batch and microfluidic reactors. (i) Cu/S atomic
ratio of produced nanoparticles. Statistics were conducted after analyzing
20 nanoparticles.
Physico-chemical
characterization of the CuS NPs synthesized in the batch reactor after
2 h of synthesis. STEM-HAADF photographs of the resulting nanoparticles
(60 °C, 2 h): (a) sacrificial Cu2O nanoparticles;
(b) detail image of a Cu2O nanoparticle. (c) Cu EDS profile
of the particle in b. Red dashed line depicts the location of the
EDS profile. (d) CuS nanoparticles produced by Kirkendall diffusion.
(e) Detailed image of a hollow CuS nanoparticle. (f) Cu EDS profile
of the particle in e. Red dashed line in e depicts the location of
the EDS profile. (g) X-ray diffractograms of the materials obtained
at different temperatures (60 and 120 °C) and the characteristic
covellite and chalcocite Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards
(JCPDS) patterns; (h) UV–vis absorption spectra of the materials
synthesized in both batch and microfluidic reactors. (i) Cu/S atomic
ratio of produced nanoparticles. Statistics were conducted after analyzing
20 nanoparticles.As can be seen in Figure h, the nanomaterials
produced in the microfluidic reactor at 90 °C in only 30 min
of residence time showed absorption spectrum at the same concentration
similar to that of the materials synthesized in the conventional batch
reactor at 120 °C during 2 h, whereas the nanoparticles synthesized
during 30 min in the batch reactor at 90 °C showed a 52% decrease
in their maximum absorption. Therefore, microfluidic reactors allow
rapid mixing, redox reaction, and a crystallization process in reduced
times compared to those of conventional batch reactors. In addition,
EDS analysis for the CuS NPs produced in the microfluidic reactor
at 90 °C and 30 min of synthesis rendered a Cu/S ratio of 1.1
± 0.1 (Figure i). The formation of covellite is sensitive to the pH, temperature,
and solvents used, and depending on those conditions, other noncrystalline
CuS phases
can be obtained.[41] We demonstrated that
microfluidic reactors can produce the desired phase with the required
optoelectronic features. Figures and S1 show how the morphology
of the nanoparticles produced in both microfluidic and batch reactors
is very similar but with the great advantage for the former of producing
nanomaterials in a continuous manner and with a considerable reduction
in the crystallization time (4-fold).
Figure 2
TEM photographs of the nanoparticles produced
in both microfluidic and batch reactors under different temperatures.
TEM photographs of the nanoparticles produced
in both microfluidic and batch reactors under different temperatures.Heating efficiency was also evaluated
for the resulting nanoparticles in the microfluidic reactor to validate
their potential application in photothermal therapy. Figure shows that the nanoparticulated
colloidal suspension (1 mL) in water (0.05 mg/mL) heats up rapidly,
and heating efficiency slightly decreased only ∼2° after
20 successive cycles of irradiation. Most of the nanoparticles after
those 20 cycles maintained their original morphology although some
fragmentation was also observed and could be responsible for that
decrease in the photothermal efficiency. In agreement with Guo et
al.,[15] the polycrystalline CuS NPs disintegrate
from the CuS shells into single CuS crystals after laser treatment.
Figure 3
TEM images
of CuS nanoparticles: (a and b) original nanoparticle suspension (1
mL, 0.05 mg/mL) obtained after 30 min of residence time in the microfluidic
reactor and (c and d) after 20 successive cycles of irradiation (200
mW/cm2). (e) Photothermal heating rise after those successive
laser irradiation cycles (200 mW/cm2).
TEM images
of CuS nanoparticles: (a and b) original nanoparticle suspension (1
mL, 0.05 mg/mL) obtained after 30 min of residence time in the microfluidic
reactor and (c and d) after 20 successive cycles of irradiation (200
mW/cm2). (e) Photothermal heating rise after those successive
laser irradiation cycles (200 mW/cm2).For any biomedical application, a complete physiological
biodegradation of the nanomaterial after use is advisable. As we mentioned
before, biopersistence is a concern when using plasmonic nanoparticles,
and in animal models it has been demonstrated that 90% of the injected
dose of CuS NPs degraded, subsequently being mostly excreted following
the hepatobiliary route 15. We characterized the degradation byproducts
after immersing the nanoparticles in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)
at different temperatures (37 and 60 °C). We observed that the
nanoparticles (Figure ) lose their plasmonic absorption over time, and this degradation
is kinetically accelerated at higher temperatures. The degradation
of the materials in other media including RPMI and DMEM was also evaluated
by following the UV–vis absorption of the materials over time,
and again the plasmonic response decreased without significant differences
between the media tested (see Figure S2). CuS degraded under those simulated conditions to form a mixture
of water-soluble sulfates including chalcantite (CuSO4·5H2O) and brochantite (Cu4SO4(OH)6) as corroborated by XRD and by using qualitative analytical techniques
such as precipitation (Figure ). Thus, the presence of sulfate anions in the degradation
byproducts of the CuS degraded nanoparticles was corroborated by precipitation
with barium chloride and including sodium sulfate as control. A white
precipitate was observed, indicative of the presence of sulfates.
The presence of copper(II) ions was also corroborated by producing
their precipitation under the presence of alkaline conditions. Under
those conditions a blue-green precipitate was observed, indicative
of the formation of Cu(OH)2. We can speculate that under
physiological conditions CuS NPs would decompose and biodegrade to
form water-soluble copper sulfates. Copper ions are essential trace
elements for the body involved in many metabolic functions. An excess
of copper ions is removed from the body by the liver via bile, and
if that route is impaired, then some metabolites carry those ions
and remove them from the body via urine.[42] Sulfates are reduced in the body to elemental sulfur, which is an
essential element in the protein synthesis, and an excess of sulfates
is removed from the body via urine and bile.[43]
Figure 4
UV–vis
spectra of the CuS NPs produced in the microfluidic reactor after
immersion in PBS at different temperatures and times. TEM photographs
showing the morphology of the nanoparticles at the different conditions.
The digital images of the vials (insets) represent the initial colloidal
suspension and the same sample after 6 days of aging at 60 °C.
Figure 5
(a) XRD spectra of the materials resulting from
degradation at 60 °C after 7 days in SBF (b) HRTEM image showing
the polycrystalline nature of the degradation byproducts (inset is
a DFT image). (c) HRTEM image with higher magnification of a degradation
byproduct. (d) Precipitation of sulfates with barium sulfate to demonstrate
their presence using (A) Na2(SO4) as control,
(B) degraded byproducts from the CuS NPs under the presence of the
barium sulfate, and (C) without barium sulfate. (e) Precipitation
of copper(II) ions with sodium hydroxide to demonstrate their presence:
(D) degraded byproducts from the CuS NPs without NaOH and (E) with
NaOH.
UV–vis
spectra of the CuS NPs produced in the microfluidic reactor after
immersion in PBS at different temperatures and times. TEM photographs
showing the morphology of the nanoparticles at the different conditions.
The digital images of the vials (insets) represent the initial colloidal
suspension and the same sample after 6 days of aging at 60 °C.(a) XRD spectra of the materials resulting from
degradation at 60 °C after 7 days in SBF (b) HRTEM image showing
the polycrystalline nature of the degradation byproducts (inset is
a DFT image). (c) HRTEM image with higher magnification of a degradation
byproduct. (d) Precipitation of sulfates with barium sulfate to demonstrate
their presence using (A) Na2(SO4) as control,
(B) degraded byproducts from the CuS NPs under the presence of the
barium sulfate, and (C) without barium sulfate. (e) Precipitation
of copper(II) ions with sodium hydroxide to demonstrate their presence:
(D) degraded byproducts from the CuS NPs without NaOH and (E) with
NaOH.
Effect of CuS NPs on Cell
Viability, Apoptosis, and Cell Cycle
The biocompatibility
of CuS NPs obtained by microfluidic reactors (90 °C, 30 min residence
time) was studied at different levels in four different cell lines.
The treatment of the cell types assayed with CuS NPs (0.01–0.1
mg/mL) did not significantly affect viability as was estimated by
the Alamar Blue assay (Figure ). The increase in CuS NPs concentration did not imply a significant
decrease in cell viability showing percentages higher than 73% in
all the cell lines and concentrations studied.
Figure 6
Cytotoxicity of CuS NPs
synthesized by microfluidics was evaluated by the Alamar Blue assay
in the four cell lines assayed after 24 h. Data are presented as the
mean ± SD of at least three experiments.
Cytotoxicity of CuS NPs
synthesized by microfluidics was evaluated by the Alamar Blue assay
in the four cell lines assayed after 24 h. Data are presented as the
mean ± SD of at least three experiments.For further studies, 0.1 mg/mL was considered as the subcytotoxic
concentration, that is, the working concentration following the recommendations
of the ISO 10993-5 in which viabilities higher than 70% are not considered
cytotoxic. The evaluation of cell apoptosis showed the effects on
cell membrane after treatment with our CuS NPs (Table ). The addition of CuS NPs at the considered
subcytotoxic concentration (0.1 mg/mL) did not exert a significant
harmful effect. In fact, necrosis showed a maximum increase of 1.60%
while apoptosis displayed an increase lower than 3.5% in fibroblasts
and mMSCs though for the phagocytic cell lines (monocytes and macrophages)
this percentage was slightly higher (≤12.6%).
Table 1
Cell Apoptosis Evaluation by Flow Cytometry after Treatment with
CuS NPsa
fibroblasts
monocytes
macrophages
mMSCs
control
NPs CuS
control
NPs CuS
control
NPs CuS
control
NPs CuS
necrosis
1.5%
1.6%
0.3%
0.8%
1.4%
3.0%
1.4%
0.9%
late apoptosis
4.7%
4.7%
6.3%
17.6%
5.7%
9.0%
14.1%
17.6%
early apoptosis
5.6%
7.1%
9.1%
10.4%
9.2%
16.4%
11.0%
10.9%
viability
88.2%
86.6%
84.3%
71.3%
83.7%
71.6%
73.5%
70.7%
Control samples (not treated cells) were analyzed
as background apoptosis level.
Control samples (not treated cells) were analyzed
as background apoptosis level.The changes in cell cycle after treatment with CuS NPs are shown
in Figure . The addition
of NPs to the cell cultures did not imply significant effects in cell
cycle distribution except for human dermal fibroblasts. All cell lines
showed a slight decrease in G1 phase being more accentuated in fibroblasts,
which registered an increase of G2 phase that was almost the double
that of the basal level. The percentages of G1 and G2 in fibroblasts
after NPs treatment were very similar; thus, it is not considered
that CuS NPs have induced the arrest of cell cycle or that DNA has
been damaged.
Figure 7
Distribution of cell cycle phases in the four cell types
assayed after treatment with CuS NPs for 24 h. Control samples (not
treated) were also analyzed as basal cell state.
Distribution of cell cycle phases in the four cell types
assayed after treatment with CuS NPs for 24 h. Control samples (not
treated) were also analyzed as basal cell state.Previous studies have shown similar effects in murine macrophages
after treatment with hexagonal CuS nanoplates with an average edge
length of 59.4 nm.[44] Viabilities were reported
close to that of the control sample for tumor cells and murine macrophages
at our lower concentration decrease around 10% at our higher concentration
(0.1 mg/mL), also showing a more accentuated effect in human endothelial
cells at the same doses.These results agree with our studies
because human macrophages displayed viability percentages higher than
87%. In this sense, hollow CuS NPs coated with PEG tested in murine
macrophage RAW264.7 cells and primary hepatocytes for 24 h did not
exert cytotoxic effects displaying viability values higher than 90%
at concentrations up to 0.1 mg/mL, though the addition of CuCl2 solutions to the cells implied a significant decrease in
cell viability which was attributed to the fast dissociation rate
of Cu ions from CuCl2 compared to that of CuS.[15] Other authors have shown the biocompatibility
of CuS NPs synthesized by wet chemistry in HEK293 cells after treatment
for 48 h at concentrations up to 0.01 mg/mL, though at 0.1 mg/mL a
significant cytotoxic effect was registered which was not displayed
in our studies despite the NPs incubation times being different.[5] These authors have also assayed the photothermal
killing effects of these NPs in a tumor cell line (HeLa cells) after
treatment for 2 h and irradiation by a near-infrared (NIR) laser showing
a significant reduction in cell viability at concentrations higher
than 0.02 mg/mL but only after irradiation; no toxic effects were
obtained without laser treatment. In this sense, coated CuS NPs with
a bovine serum albumin–folic acid (BSA-FA) complex[45] or with DSPE-PEG2000[46] were also assayed in HeLa cells for 24 h, displaying viability values
higher than 70% at concentrations up to 0.4 mg/mL, though NIR laser
irradiation significantly increased cell death. However, nonaqueous
copper sulfide nanocrystals obtained from a continuous-flow millifluidic
chip exerted higher cytotoxic effects, decreasing viability to 50%
at lower concentrations (<0.003 mg/mL) in RAW264.7mouse macrophages
which was more pronounced when cells were irradiated by a NIR laser
due to the photothermal effects of CuS nanocrystals.[35]The photothermal effect in vitro was analyzed using
CuS NPs obtained by microfluidics (90 °C, 30 min residence time)
on murine mesenchymal stem cells (mMSCs) by culturing those cells
for 24 h under the presence of subcytotoxic doses of the nanoparticles
(0.1 mg/mL). NIR laser irradiation (808 nm, 200 mW/cm2,
20 min) did not reduce cell viability (Figure ) on cells treated with the laser at that
irradiance without nanoparticles. On the contrary, a reduced cell
viability (measured by fluorescence microscopy through double-staining
mediated by the LIVE/DEAD Viability/Cytotoxicity Kit) was observed
when cells were treated with the laser in the presence of the CuS
nanoparticles.
Figure 8
Photothermal effects on mMSCs. (A–D) Composition
of pictures (4× magnification) to show the whole cell culture
well; (E–H) individual fields (4× magnification). (A and
E) mMSCs not treated with CuS nanoparticles and not irradiated, (B
and F) mMSCs treated with CuS NPs, (C and G) mMSCs laser irradiated
(808 nm, 200 mW/cm2, 20 min); and (D and H) mMSCs treated
with CuS NPs and laser irradiated 808 nm, 200 mW/cm2, 20
min). The cells were observed under fluorescence microscope, showing
live cells in green and dead cells in red.
Photothermal effects on mMSCs. (A–D) Composition
of pictures (4× magnification) to show the whole cell culture
well; (E–H) individual fields (4× magnification). (A and
E) mMSCs not treated with CuS nanoparticles and not irradiated, (B
and F) mMSCs treated with CuS NPs, (C and G) mMSCs laser irradiated
(808 nm, 200 mW/cm2, 20 min); and (D and H) mMSCs treated
with CuS NPs and laser irradiated 808 nm, 200 mW/cm2, 20
min). The cells were observed under fluorescence microscope, showing
live cells in green and dead cells in red.Finally, to decouple the photothermal effect from the photodynamic
effect, we selected the specific conditions under which a chromophore
(dihydrorhodamine 123, DHR123) does not degrade under heating, but
its oxidation caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation is
easily measured by using fluorescence spectroscopy. DHR123 is a nonfluorescent
probe that is easily oxidized to Rhodamine 123 (R123, a fluorescent
probe) under the presence of ROS. We first evaluated the heating rate
after irradiating (200 mW/cm2, 808 nm) a dispersion of
our CuS nanoparticles (0.05 mg/mL) in 1 mL of ethanol. The temperature
increased from the initial 37 to 68 °C in 4 min of irradiation. Figure S4 shows that the CuS NPs irradiated with
the 808 nm laser produced higher oxidation of DHR123 compared to CuS
NPs solution heated under the same conditions. The fluorescence intensity
at 530 nm was enhanced 2-fold under laser irradiation, which was attributed
to the ROS generation. DHR123 solution heated for 5 min did not show
any increase in the fluorescence intensity (Figure S5), which confirmed that the enhancement in the oxidation
was attributed to the photodynamic effect due to the presence of CuS
NPs. CuS NPs did not yield fluorescence at the wavelength of 530 nm
under the assay conditions.All these results point to the biocompatibility
of our CuS NPs obtained by microfluidics and highlight their potential
in clinical applications as therapeutic carriers being a powerful
material in the photothermal and photodynamic treatment of malignant
cells.
Conclusions
It is possible to synthesize
CuS nanoparticles with absorbance in the NIR region of the electromagnetic
spectrum by using a microfluidic reactor. The physicochemical properties
of the resulting nanoparticles are similar to those of the ones obtained
in the conventional batch synthesis although the synthesis times are
reduced 4-fold when using the microfluidic platform. Under simulated
physiological conditions, CuS nanoparticles degrade into soluble coppersulfates, which highlights the great advantage of those nanomaterials
compared to other conventional plasmonic nanomaterials such as gold
nanostructures or carbon-based nanoparticles. Also, subcytotoxicological
doses of those nanoparticles were calculated on different cell lines
using the Alamar Blue assay and analyzing the cell cycle using flow
cytometry. At subcytotoxic doses, those nanoparticles show an elevated
photothermal effect as well as ROS generation.
Experimental
Section
Chemicals and Methods
All the chemicals (polyvinylpyrrolidone,
10 000 Da Mw; polyvynilpyrrolidone
K30 (PVP K30), 40 000 Da Mw; polyvinylpyrrolidone,
50 000 Da Mw; copper(II) chloride
dihydrate, ACS reagent ≥99.0%; sodium sulfide nonahydrate,
ACS reagent ≥98,0%; hydrazine, 35 wt % in water; sodium hydroxide,
ACS reagent ≥97%, dihydrorhodamine-123 (DHR123, 95%)) were
purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used without further purification.The synthesis of CuS NPs using a batch reactor was performed following
the work of Ramadan et al.[47] with some
modifications. In brief, syntheses at 60 °C were carried out
in an open flask by mixing 240 mg of PVP K30 dissolved in 25 mL of
DDI water with 100 μL of a 0.5 M solution of CuCl2 and 25 mL of water with its pH adjusted to 9. Next, 6.4 mL of hydrazine
solution was added under stirring, with the consequent formation of
Cu2O seeds; finally, 200 μL of Na2S (320
mg/mL) was added to the previous dispersion while keeping it under
heating at 60 °C for 2 h. All the solutions are added consecutively
without dwell times. Syntheses at 120–150 °C were carried
out following the same procedure but by heating the final colloidal
dispersion in a PTFE-lined sealed autoclave placed in the oven. After
synthesis, the resulting CuS NPs were thoroughly washed in DDI water
by successive cycles of centrifugation.Continuous microfluidic
synthesis was carried out by using two consecutive Y-shaped PEEK micromixers
(500 μm inner diameter). In the first micromixer, two solutions
were interfaced to form the Cu2O seeds by use of syringe
pumps (Harvard Apparatus) with the same flow rates (4.625 mL/h): A
first solution prepared by mixing 480 mg of PVP K30 dissolved in 30
mL of DDI water with 200 μL of a 0.5 M solution of CuCl2 adjusted at a pH of 9 was mixed with a second solution composed
of 12.8 μL of hydrazine in 30 mL of DDI water and 25 mL of water
with its pH adjusted to 9. The resulting Cu2O dispersion
was then interfaced in a second Y-shaped micromixer with a solution
fed at a flow rate of 9.25 mL/h and prepared by diluting 400 μL
Na2S (320 mg/mL) in 60 mL of DDI water. PTFE tubing (0.8
mm ID) was used in the first stage with the appropriate length to
reach a residence time of 30 s. In the second stage, 1.5 mm ID PTFE
tubing was used with different lengths to reach different residence
times. A back-pressure regulator (Zaiput Flow Technologies) was used
for synthesis at temperatures above 100 °C (see Figure S3). The temperature of the tubing was maintained by
immersing it in a temperature-controlled oil bath.The morphology
of the nanoparticles was visualized by transmission electron microscopy
(TEM; FEI Tecnai T20, operating at 200 kV). Scanning-transmission
imaging with a high-angle annular dark-field detector (STEM-HAADF)
and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis were carried
out in a transmission electron microscope (STEM; FEI Tecnai F30, operating
at 300 kV). The crystallinity, purity, and structure of the materials
were studied by low-angle X-ray diffraction. The patterns were recorded
in a Philips X-Pert diffractometer equipped with a monochromatized
Cu Kα radiation source (40 kV, 20 mA) over the range 0.6–10.0
with a step of 0.02 and an analysis time of 5 s. UV–vis absorption
spectra were evaluated via a UV–vis–NIR spectrophotometer
(Jasco V670, Tokyo, Japan). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS,
Axis Ultra DLD, Kratos Tech.) was used to evaluate the oxidation state
of the CuS nanoparticles. Heating efficiency was measured with the
aid of a 808 nm wavelength laser diode (6 × 8 mm2 spot
size; Optilas model MDL-III-808-2W, Changchun New Industries Optoelectronics
Technology Co., Ltd., Changchun, China) and a power controller (Model
PD300-3W, Ophir Laser Measurement Group, Logan, UT, USA) with an irradiance
of 200 mW/cm2. Temperature gradients were monitored using
a type K thermocouple (RS Amidata, Madrid, Spain) immersed in the
dispersion parallel to the path of the laser light but without being
intercepted with it. The hydrodynamic diameter of aqueous dispersions
of CuS nanoparticles was evaluated by dynamic light scattering (DLS)
in a 90Plus Particle Size Analyzer by Brookhaven Instruments Corp.,
Holtsville, NY, USA.
Cell Culture
The biocompatibility
of the CuS NPs synthesized was assessed at different levels regarding
metabolism, cell nucleus (DNA and cell cycle), and cell membrane (induction
of apoptosis). These studies were performed using mouse mesenchymal
stem cells (mMSCs) kindly gifted by Dr. Pilar Martín-Duque,
human dermal fibroblasts purchased from Lonza (Belgium), and THP1human monocytes obtained from the American Type Culture Collection
(USA).Fibroblasts were grown in high-glucoseDMEM (DMEM w/stable
glutamine; BioWest, France) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum
(FBS; Gibco, UK), penicillin/streptomycin (100 U/100 μg/mL;
Lonza, Belgium), and amphotericin B (1.5 μg/mL; Lonza, Belgium).
mMSCs were cultured in DMEM-F12 containing 1% glutamine (Gibco, UK),
10% FBS (Gibco, UK), penicillin/streptomycin (100 U/100 μg/mL;
Lonza, Belgium), and amphotericin B (1.5 μg/mL; Lonza, Belgium).
Monocytes were cultured in RPMI 1640 (RPMI 1640 w/stable glutamine;
Biowest, France) supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% HEPES, 1% nonessential
amino acids, 0.1% 2-mercaptoethanol 50 mM, 1% sodium pyruvate 100
mM, penicillin/streptomycin (100 U/100 μg/mL), and amphotericin
B (1.5 μg/mL), all purchased from Gibco (UK). Macrophages were
obtained by the in vitro differentiation of monocytes by adding 1
μM phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA)
to the cell culture. All cell types were grown in humidified atmosphere
at 37 °C and 5% CO2, except for mMSCs which were cultured
in hypoxia (3% O2).
CuS NPs Cytotoxicity
The effects of CuS NPs treatment in cell metabolism were determined
by the Alamar Blue assay (Invitrogen, US). Cells were seeded in a
96-well plate and incubated with CuS NPs (0.01–0.1 mg/mL) for
24 h. Alamar blue was then added (10%) and incubated for 4 h. The
reduction of the dye to a fluorescent compound by metabolically active
cells was read in a microplate reader (Multimode Synergy HT Microplate
Reader; Biotek, US) at 535/590 nm ex/em. Cell viability was determined
by interpolation of the emission data obtained from the treated samples
and the control samples (untreated cells = 100% viability).
Evaluation
of Cell Apoptosis
CuS NPs effects on cell membrane after
treatment for 24 h were determined by the study of cell apoptosis
by flow cytometry at the subcytotoxic concentration obtained from
the alamar blue assay. After treatment with NPs, cells were harvested
in PBS and double-stained with annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide.
In brief, cell suspensions were stained with annexin V-FITC and treated
with a solution composed of annexin V-FITC, propidium iodide, and
annexin V binding buffer to be finally incubated with the binding
buffer for 15 min before the analysis of the samples in the FACSARIA
BD equipment and the FACSDIVA BD software (Cell Separation and Cytometry
Unit, CIBA, IIS Aragon, Spain). Control samples (not treated cells)
were also evaluated to determine the influence of the CuS NPs on apoptosis.
Study of Cell Cycle
The distribution of cell cycle phases
after NPs treatment was assessed by flow cytometry in order to elucidate
the effects of CuS NPs in cell cycle and DNA. As described above,
cells were treated for 24 h at the CuS NPs subcytotoxic concentration.
Then, cells were collected in PBS and fixed in 70% ice-cold ethanol.
After 24 h incubation at 4 °C, DNA staining was developed by
adding RNase A and propidium iodide. Samples were analyzed in a FACSARRAY
BD equipment with the MODIFIT 3.0 Verity. Control samples (not treated
cells) were also run to assay the normal distribution of cell cycle
in the cell lines assayed.
Photothermal in Vitro Assay
mMSCs
were cultured at a cell density of 60 000 cells/well in a 24-well
plate for 24 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2, and hypoxia. Then,
culture medium was removed, and CuS NPs (0.1 mg/mL) were added to
the cells for 24 h. After incubation, samples were irradiated with
the NIR diode laser (808 nm, for 20 min at 200 mW/cm2).
The effects of the irradiation on cell viability was observed by fluorescence
microscopy through the double-staining mediated by the LIVE/DEAD Viability/Cytotoxicity
Kit (Thermo-Fisher Scientific, USA) following the manufacturer instructions.
In brief, a solution containing 2 μM calcein AM and 4 μM
ethidium homodimer-1 in PBS was prepared and added to the cells. Then,
cells were incubated for 30 min at room temperature in the dark. The
samples were evaluated in an inverted fluorescence microscope Olympus
IX81. Control samples (not irradiated and/or not treated with CuS
NPs) were also assayed to obtain the basal viability status of mMSCs.
The experiments were run in duplicate.
Reactive Oxygen Species
Generation
DHR123 was used to detect ROS generated by the
presence of CuS NPs under light irradiation. DHR123 is a nonfluorescent
probe that it is oxidized in the presence of ROS to form Rhodamine
(R123), a highly fluorescent molecule that has an emission peak centered
at 530 nm.[48] CuS NPs did not yield fluorescence
at the wavelength of 530 nm under the assay conditions.A CuS
nanoparticulated dispersion at 0.05 mg/mL was mixed with 250 μL
of 6.6 μM DHR123 in 1 mL of ethanol. The solution was irradiated
at 200 mW/cm2 (at 808 nm) to study the ROS generation upon
NPs irradiation. Formation of R123 was monitored by fluorescence spectroscopy
using an excitation wavelength of 485 nm, recording the emission in
the 500–600 nm range. As a control, it became necessary to
determine if the heating caused by the laser absorption of the CuS
nanoparticles would also produce R123 without any irradiation. Therefore,
control experiments were performed by heating dispersions of DHR123
and CuS NPs with DHR123. The control assays were performed using the
same heating rate observed during the irradiation of the CuS nanoparticle
dispersions in order to establish a comparison. The fluorescence of
the samples was measured before and after 5 min of irradiation or
heating.
Authors: Min Zhou; Rui Zhang; Miao Huang; Wei Lu; Shaoli Song; Marites P Melancon; Mei Tian; Dong Liang; Chun Li Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2010-11-03 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Yi Xie; Wenhui Chen; Giovanni Bertoni; Ilka Kriegel; Mo Xiong; Neng Li; Mirko Prato; Andreas Riedinger; Ayyappan Sathya; Liberato Manna Journal: Chem Mater Date: 2017-01-26 Impact factor: 9.811
Authors: Belén Rubio-Ruiz; Ana M Pérez-López; Thomas L Bray; Martin Lee; Alan Serrels; Martín Prieto; Manuel Arruebo; Neil O Carragher; Víctor Sebastián; Asier Unciti-Broceta Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2018-01-22 Impact factor: 9.229