| Literature DB >> 27486438 |
Sherry L Seston1, Roxanne A Beinart2, Neha Sarode3, Abigail C Shockey4, Piyush Ranjan3, Sangita Ganesh3, Peter R Girguis2, Frank J Stewart3.
Abstract
Endosymbioses between animals and chemoautotrophic bacteria are ubiquitous at hydrothermal vents. These environments are distinguished by high physico-chemical variability, yet we know little about how these symbioses respond to environmental fluctuations. We therefore examined how the γ-proteobacterial symbionts of the vent snail Ifremeria nautilei respond to changes in sulfur geochemistry. Via shipboard high-pressure incubations, we subjected snails to 105 μM hydrogen sulfide (LS), 350 μM hydrogen sulfide (HS), 300 μM thiosulfate (TS) and seawater without any added inorganic electron donor (ND). While transcript levels of sulfur oxidation genes were largely consistent across treatments, HS and TS treatments stimulated genes for denitrification, nitrogen assimilation, and CO2 fixation, coincident with previously reported enhanced rates of inorganic carbon incorporation and sulfur oxidation in these treatments. Transcripts for genes mediating oxidative damage were enriched in the ND and LS treatments, potentially due to a reduction in O2 scavenging when electron donors were scarce. Oxidative TCA cycle gene transcripts were also more abundant in ND and LS treatments, suggesting that I. nautilei symbionts may be mixotrophic when inorganic electron donors are limiting. These data reveal the extent to which I. nautilei symbionts respond to changes in sulfur concentration and species, and, interpreted alongside coupled biochemical metabolic rates, identify gene targets whose expression patterns may be predictive of holobiont physiology in environmental samples.Entities:
Keywords: Ifremeria nautilei; Sulfur oxidizers; chemoautotroph; deep sea vents; endosymbiont; metatranscriptomics; methanotrophic bacteria
Year: 2016 PMID: 27486438 PMCID: PMC4949241 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01074
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Date and location of experimental animal collection.
| HS | ABE | J2-423 | May 22, 2009 | −20° 45.794′ | −176° 11.466′ | 2152 |
| TS | ABE | J2-427 | May 27, 2009 | −20° 45.797′ | −176° 11.477′ | 2150 |
| ND | Tu'i Malila | J2-428 | May 29, 2009 | −21° 59.358′ | −176° 34.086′ | 1885 |
| LS | Tu'i Malila | J2-430 | June 2, 2009 | −21° 59.354′ | −176° 34.080′ | 1885 |
Net sulfur uptake (oxidation) and carbon incorporation by .
| HS | 34 | 349 (329, 387) | 7.2 ± 0.75 | 1 | −29.74 | 0.00 |
| 2 | 1.41 | 1.64 | ||||
| 3 | 217.29 | 9.57 | ||||
| TS | 37 | 276 (216, 310) | 12.0 ± 2.1 | 1 | 15.16 | 4.22 |
| 2 | 87.93 | 8.67 | ||||
| 3 | 46.02 | 7.06 | ||||
| ND | 34 | BDL | NA | 1 | −31.40 | 0.00 |
| 2 | −30.82 | 0.00 | ||||
| 3 | −31.16 | 0.00 | ||||
| LS | 40 | 105 (57, 137) | 2.8 ± 0.77 | 1 | −28.10 | 0.00 |
| 2 | −25.65 | 0.21 | ||||
| 3 | 2.85 | 0.71 |
Average (min, max) concentrations of sulfur compounds in input water as measured via a voltammetric electrode and/or with Klein method. Wet mass-specific sulfur oxidation rates are shown as the average ± S.D. Incorporation of stable isotopic label shown as per mil values of experimental I. nautilei gill tissue and wet mass-specific rates of incorporation into gill tissue (Beinart et al., .
Detection limits: Sulfide 0.20 μM; Thiosulfate, 30 μM.
Sulfur compounds were not added. Below detection limit (BDL) for all measurable sulfur compounds in both input and effluent.
Figure 1Distribution of amplified 16S rRNA genes (A) and 16S rRNA transcripts (B) in .
Figure 2Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of the top 5 most abundant 16S rRNA gene OTUs. The 5 OTUs shown here accounted for 98% of all 781 662 reads analyzed. The tree is based on 252 unambiguously aligned nucleotide positions. Two ε-proteobacterial Alviniconcha hessleri symbionts are used as the outgroup. The numbers to the left of each node are bootstrap values obtained from 1000 replicates; only values greater than 50% are indicated.
Figure 3Bar graph showing the distribution of 16S rRNA OTUs in .
Metatranscriptome sequence characteristics.
| HS-1 | 2,106,871 | 1,500,965 | 605,906 (28%) | 175,997 | 114,267 | 74,424 (65%) | 36,481 (32%) | 3,362 (3%) |
| HS-2 | 3,097,455 | 2,399,502 | 697,953 (23%) | 215,535 | 150,694 | 87,022 (58%) | 56,710 (38%) | 6,962 (4%) |
| HS-3 | 2,753,601 | 2,074,095 | 679,506 (25%) | 226,213 | 156,536 | 79,203 (51%) | 75,514 (48%) | 1,819 (1%) |
| TS-1 | 1,138,408 | 870,307 | 268,101 (24%) | 63,447 | 42,524 | 29,811 (70%) | 11,654 (27%) | 1,059 (3%) |
| TS-2 | 3,140,132 | 2,412,371 | 727,761 (23%) | 192,802 | 138,917 | 85,890 (62%) | 48,067 (35%) | 4,960 (3%) |
| TS-3 | 2,903,835 | 2,219,159 | 684,676 (24%) | 188,561 | 138,659 | 83,649 (60%) | 50,116 (36%) | 4,894 (4%) |
| LS-1 | 1,280,435 | 974,592 | 305,843 (24%) | 69,872 | 42,796 | 29,272 (68%) | 13,051 (30%) | 473 (2%) |
| LS-2 | 3,511,480 | 2,583,832 | 927,648 (26%) | 265,621 | 184,359 | 109,752 (60%) | 67,796 (37%) | 6,811 (3%) |
| LS-3 | 2,958,987 | 2,295,224 | 663,763 (29%) | 189,656 | 138,931 | 92,533 (67%) | 41,765 (30%) | 4,633 (3%) |
| ND-1 | 2,115,702 | 1,462,295 | 653,407 (31%) | 153,995 | 96,528 | 70,884 (73%) | 23,290 (24%) | 2,354 (3%) |
| ND-2 | 4,982,423 | 3,854,530 | 1,127,887 (23%) | 318,447 | 229,893 | 128,470 (56%) | 88,102 (38%) | 13,321 (6%) |
| ND-3 | 3,775,724 | 2,717,615 | 1,058,109 (28%) | 298,774 | 203,180 | 137,423 (68%) | 59,246 (29%) | 6,511 (3%) |
Includes proteins predicted to be of viral, archaeal, or unknown origin.
Estimated proportion of differential expression based on posterior likelihoods of differential expression among treatments.
| (HS,HS,HS,TS,TS,TS) (LS,LS,LS,ND,ND,ND) | 0.39 (8) | 0.29 (23) | 0.49 (62) |
| (HS,HS,HS) (TS,TS,TS) (LS,LS,LS) (ND,ND,ND) | 0.24 (6) | 0.05 (10) | 0.04 (2) |
| (HS,HS,HS,TS,TS,TS,LS,LS,LS) (ND,ND,ND) | 0.18 (1) | 0.07 (0) | 0.16 (0) |
| (HS,HS,HS,LS,LS,LS) (TS,TS,TS) | 0.10 (0) | 0.09 (0) | 0.21 (1) |
HS, High Sulfide; TS, Thiosulfate; LS, Low Sulfide; ND, No e- donor.
Number of subsystems differentially expressed (FDR = 0.05) shown in parentheses.
Figure 4Heat map displaying hierarchical distance clustering of the eight SEED Subsystems differential expressed under HD vs. LD conditions based on normalized transcript abundance. Each row corresponds to a SEED subsystem, and each column to an individual experimental Ifremeria nautilei. Relative expression levels are indicated by colors shown in the scale at the top left. The dendrogram at the top shows the clustering of the individual snail samples. The dendrogram at left demonstrates the clustering of the SEED Subsystems.
Figure 5Expression patterns for key proteins involved in proposed sulfur oxidation, nitrogen reduction and assimilation, and carbon metabolism pathways in chemosynthetic . Proteins and complexes are colored based on transcript abundance in snail metatranscriptomes: green, constitutive expression (transcripts detected in all metatranscriptomes); yellow, HD expression > LD expression (FDR < 0.05); red, LD expression > HD expression (FDR < 0.05); white, sporadic or low expression (transcripts detected in fewer than 9 of the 12 metatranscriptomes); only proteins for which transcripts were detected are shown. Sulfur oxidation: Sox, Sox multi enzyme complex; AprAB, adenylylsulfate reductase; DsrL, Sulfur oxidation-associated protein DsrL; DsrEFH, putative sulfurtransferase complex; DsrC, putative bacterial heterodisulfide; DsrAB, reverse-type dissimilatory sulfite reductase; DsrJKMOP, sulfite reduction-associated complex DsrMKJOP; QmoABC/HdrABC, putative quinone-interacting membrane-bound oxidoreductase; RnfG, Rnf electron transport complex; Sat, sulfur adenylyltransferase; Sqr, sulfide quinone (oxido)reductase. N metabolism: Nap, periplasmic nitrate reductase; NirS, membrane-bound respiratory nitrite reductase; NirBD, NADH-dependent siroheme nitrite reductase; NorCB, nitric oxide reductase; NosZ, nitrous oxide reductase; GlutSyn, glutamine synthetase + glutamate synthase. TCA cycle: Pyr dehy, pyruvate dehydrogenase; Cit syn, citrate synthase; Acon hydr, Aconitate hydratase; Iso dehy, Isocitrate dehydrogenase; 2oxo dehy, 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase; Suc ligase, Succinyl-CoA ligase; Suc dehy, Succinate dehydrogenase; Fum hydr, Fumarate hydratase class I; Mal dehy, Malate dehydrogenase. Carbon fixation: RubisCO, Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase; PGK, Phosphoglycerate kinase; GAPDH, NAD-dependent glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; TPI, Triosephosphate isomerase; FBA, Fructose bisphosphate aldolase; PfkA, Reversible pyrophosphate-dependent phosphofructokinase; HppA, membrane-bound proton-translocating pyrophosphatase; TKL, Transketolase; RPE, Ribulose-phosphate-3-epimerase; RPI, Ribose-5-phosphate isomerase A; PRK, Phosphoribulokinase; RuBP, Ribose-1,5-bisphosphate; 3PG, 3-phosphoglycerate; G3P, Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate; DHAP, Dihydroxyacetone phosphate; FBP, Fructose-1,6-bisphosphate; F6P, Fructose-6-phosphate; X5P, Xylose-5-phosphate; Ru5P, Ribulose-5-phosphate; R5P, Ribose-5-phosphate; S7P, Sedoheptulose-7-phosphate; PPi, inorganic pyrophosphate; Pi, inorganic phosphate.