Literature DB >> 27485998

Evaluation of US prescription patterns: Are treatment guidelines for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism being followed?

Alok A Khorana1, Daniel Yannicelli2, Keith R McCrae3, Dejan Milentijevic4, Concetta Crivera5, Winnie W Nelson6, Jeffrey R Schein7.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication of cancer. Clinical practice guidelines recommend low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for treatment of cancer-associated VTE, but it is unclear how frequently these are followed. This study assessed anticoagulation treatment patterns for VTE in newly diagnosed cancer patients in the United States.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: MarketScan® claims records of more than 80 million insured members between January 1, 2009 and July 31, 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Subjects were included if they were 18years of age or older, and had a diagnosis of cancer (9 solid tumor types) and VTE. Data were included for LMWH, warfarin, and other anticoagulants (fondaparinux and direct oral anticoagulants [DOACs]). Patients with anticoagulant treatment prior to cancer diagnosis were excluded.
RESULTS: VTE developed in 6.2% of cancer patients (median, 181days after cancer diagnosis). VTE rates were highest for pancreatic (17.5%) and lung (12.6%) cancer and lowest for breast (4.2%) and prostate (4.1%) cancer. For patients for whom outpatient prescription data were available, warfarin was most commonly used (50.0%), followed by LMWH (40.0%) and other anticoagulants (10.0%). Over 6months, 13% of patients who initiated injectable anticoagulants remained on them compared with 30% of those who initiated oral anticoagulants. More patients switched from LMWH to warfarin and other anticoagulants (44%) versus those who switched from warfarin (28%).
CONCLUSIONS: Warfarin was the most utilized anticoagulant for cancer-associated VTE despite guideline recommendations for LMWH. More patients remained on oral versus injectable agents, which may be related to self-injection burden and costs.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anticoagulant; Cancer; Low-molecular-weight heparin; Practice guideline; Venous thromboembolism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27485998     DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Res        ISSN: 0049-3848            Impact factor:   3.944


  35 in total

Review 1.  Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Cancer: Practical Considerations for the Management of Patients with Nausea or Vomiting.

Authors:  Hanno Riess; Cihan Ay; Rupert Bauersachs; Cecilia Becattini; Jan Beyer-Westendorf; Francis Cajfinger; Ian Chau; Alexander T Cohen; Alok A Khorana; Anthony Maraveyas; Marcos Renni; Annie M Young
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-04-12

Review 2.  The role of direct oral anticoagulants in cancer-related venous thromboembolism: a perspective beyond the guidelines.

Authors:  Cristhiam M Rojas-Hernandez
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Anticoagulation Strategies in Patients With Cancer: JACC Review Topic of the Week.

Authors:  Ramya C Mosarla; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Arman Qamar; Javid Moslehi; Gregory Piazza; Robert P Giugliano
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Does androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer increase the risk for thromboembolic disease?

Authors:  Jehonathan H Pinthus; Wilhelmina C Duivenvoorden
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 5.  Anticoagulation in Cancer Patients: a Summary of Pitfalls to Avoid.

Authors:  Harsh K Patel; Alok A Khorana
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  Cost effectiveness analysis of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) versus dalteparin for the treatment of cancer associated thrombosis (CAT) in the United States.

Authors:  Ang Li; Poorni M Manohar; David A Garcia; Gary H Lyman; Lotte M Steuten
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.944

Review 7.  Prevention and Treatment of Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: a Review.

Authors:  Kristen M Sanfilippo; Tzu-Fei Wang
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-11-20

Review 8.  Update from the laboratory: mechanistic studies of pathways of cancer-associated venous thrombosis using mouse models.

Authors:  Yohei Hisada; Nigel Mackman
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2019-12-06

9.  Gastrointestinal Malignancies and Venous Thromboembolic Disease: Clinical Significance and Endovascular Interventions.

Authors:  Xin Li; Sasan Partovi; Sameer Gadani; Charles Martin; Avi Beck; Suresh Vedantham
Journal:  Dig Dis Interv       Date:  2020-09-22

10.  Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants (NOAC) as an Alternative Treatment Option in Tumor-Related Venous Thromboembolism.

Authors:  Jan Beyer-Westendorf; Robert Klamroth; Stephan Kreher; Florian Langer; Axel Matzdorff; Hanno Riess
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 5.594

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.