Literature DB >> 27485730

Affective health bias in older adults: Considering positive and negative affect in a general health context.

Brenda R Whitehead1, C S Bergeman2.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Because subjective health reports are a primary source of health information in a number of medical and research-based contexts, much research has been devoted to establishing the extent to which these self-reports of health correspond to health information from more objective sources. One of the key factors considered in this area is trait affect, with most studies emphasizing the impact of negative affect (negative emotions) over positive affect (positive emotions), and focusing on high-arousal affect (e.g., anger, excitement) over moderate- or low-arousal affect (e.g., relaxed, depressed).
OBJECTIVES: The present study examines the impact of both Positive and Negative Affect (PA/NA)-measured by items of both high and low arousal-on the correspondence between objective health information and subjective health reports. Another limitation of existing literature in the area is the focus on samples suffering from a particular diagnosis or on specific symptom reports; here, these effects are investigated in a sample of community-dwelling older adults representing a broader spectrum of health.
METHOD: 153 older adults (Mage = 71.2) took surveys assessing Perceived Health and Affect and underwent an objective physical health assessment. Structural equation modeling was used to investigate the extent to which the relationship between Objective Health and Perceived Health was moderated by PA or NA, which would indicate the presence of affective health bias.
RESULTS: Results reveal a significant moderation effect for NA, but not for PA; PA appeared to serve a more mediational function, indicating that NA and PA operate on health perceptions in distinct ways.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide evidence that in our high-functioning, community-dwelling sample of older adults, a) affective health bias is present within a general health context, and not only within specific symptom or diagnostic categories; and b) that both PA and NA play important roles in the process.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Affective health bias; Negative affect; Physical health; Positive affect

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27485730      PMCID: PMC5003659          DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  32 in total

1.  Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001.

Authors:  Ali H Mokdad; Earl S Ford; Barbara A Bowman; William H Dietz; Frank Vinicor; Virginia S Bales; James S Marks
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Probability of stroke: a risk profile from the Framingham Study.

Authors:  P A Wolf; R B D'Agostino; A J Belanger; W B Kannel
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  The influence of film-induced mood on pain perception.

Authors:  Matisyohu Weisenberg; Tal Raz; Tamar Hener
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  Symptom reporting in asthma patients and insulin-dependent diabetics.

Authors:  R Schandry; C Leopold; M Vogt
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1996-01-05       Impact factor: 3.251

5.  Emotion and aging: experience, expression, and control.

Authors:  J J Gross; L L Carstensen; M Pasupathi; J Tsai; C G Skorpen; A Y Hsu
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1997-12

Review 6.  Sex differences in physical symptoms: the contribution of symptom perception theory.

Authors:  C M van Wijk; A M Kolk
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Validity of self-reported diagnoses leading to hospitalization: a comparison of self-reports with hospital records in a prospective study of American adults.

Authors:  M M Bergmann; T Byers; D S Freedman; A Mokdad
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 8.  Gait speed at usual pace as a predictor of adverse outcomes in community-dwelling older people an International Academy on Nutrition and Aging (IANA) Task Force.

Authors:  G Abellan van Kan; Y Rolland; S Andrieu; J Bauer; O Beauchet; M Bonnefoy; M Cesari; L M Donini; S Gillette Guyonnet; M Inzitari; F Nourhashemi; G Onder; P Ritz; A Salva; M Visser; B Vellas
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.075

Review 9.  Positive affect and psychobiological processes relevant to health.

Authors:  Andrew Steptoe; Samantha Dockray; Jane Wardle
Journal:  J Pers       Date:  2009-09-30

10.  Modeling multisystem biological risk in young adults: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study.

Authors:  Teresa Seeman; Tara Gruenewald; Arun Karlamangla; Steve Sidney; Kiang Liu; Bruce McEwen; Joseph Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.937

View more
  2 in total

1.  Social Integration, Daily Discrimination, and Biological Markers of Health in Mid- and Later Life: Does Self-Esteem Play an Intermediary Role?

Authors:  Jeffrey E Stokes
Journal:  Innov Aging       Date:  2020-07-06

2.  Higher Negative Self-Reference Level in Patients With Personality Disorders and Suicide Attempt(s) History During Biological Treatment for Major Depressive Disorder: Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Samuel Bulteau; Morgane Péré; Myriam Blanchin; Emmanuel Poulet; Jérôme Brunelin; Anne Sauvaget; Véronique Sébille
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-03-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.