Literature DB >> 27485684

Comparative thermal unfolding study of psychrophilic and mesophilic subtilisin-like serine proteases by molecular dynamics simulations.

Xing Du1, Peng Sang2, Yuan-Ling Xia1, Yi Li1, Jing Liang1, Shi-Meng Ai3, Xing-Lai Ji1,4, Yun-Xin Fu1,5, Shu-Qun Liu1,4.   

Abstract

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of a subtilisin-like serine protease VPR from the psychrophilic marine bacterium Vibrio sp. PA-44 and its mesophilic homologue, proteinase K (PRK), have been performed for 20 ns at four different temperatures (300, 373, 473, and 573 K). The comparative analyses of MD trajectories reveal that at almost all temperatures, VPR exhibits greater structural fluctuations/deviations, more unstable regular secondary structural elements, and higher global flexibility than PRK. Although these two proteases follow similar unfolding pathways at high temperatures, VPR initiates unfolding at a lower temperature and unfolds faster at the same high temperatures than PRK. These observations collectively indicate that VPR is less stable and more heat-labile than PRK. Analyses of the structural/geometrical properties reveal that, when compared to PRK, VPR has larger radius of gyration (Rg), less intramolecular contacts and hydrogen bonds (HBs), more protein-solvent HBs, and smaller burial of nonpolar area and larger exposure of polar area. These suggest that the increased flexibility of VPR would be most likely caused by its reduced intramolecular interactions and more favourable protein-solvent interactions arising from the larger exposure of the polar area, whereas the enhanced stability of PRK could be ascribed to its increased intramolecular interactions arising from the better optimized hydrophobicity. The factors responsible for the significant differences in local flexibility between these two proteases were also analyzed and ascertained. This study provides insights into molecular basis of thermostability of homologous serine proteases adapted to different temperatures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hydrophobicity; protein unfolding; protein-solvent interactions; stability and flexibility; temperature adaption

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27485684     DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2016.1188155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol Struct Dyn        ISSN: 0739-1102


  6 in total

1.  Structural flexibility and protein adaptation to temperature: Molecular dynamics analysis of malate dehydrogenases of marine molluscs.

Authors:  Yun-Wei Dong; Ming-Ling Liao; Xian-Liang Meng; George N Somero
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Insights into the role of electrostatics in temperature adaptation: a comparative study of psychrophilic, mesophilic, and thermophilic subtilisin-like serine proteases.

Authors:  Yuan-Ling Xia; Jian-Hong Sun; Shi-Meng Ai; Yi Li; Xing Du; Peng Sang; Li-Quan Yang; Yun-Xin Fu; Shu-Qun Liu
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 4.036

3.  Semi-rational design and molecular dynamics simulations study of the thermostability enhancement of cellobiose 2-epimerases.

Authors:  Qiuming Chen; Yaqin Xiao; Eugene I Shakhnovich; Wenli Zhang; Wanmeng Mu
Journal:  Int J Biol Macromol       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 6.953

4.  New Insight into Mechanisms of Protein Adaptation to High Temperatures: A Comparative Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study of Thermophilic and Mesophilic Subtilisin-Like Serine Proteases.

Authors:  Peng Sang; Shu-Qun Liu; Li-Quan Yang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Insights into the molecular mechanism underlying CD4-dependency and neutralization sensitivity of HIV-1: a comparative molecular dynamics study on gp120s from isolates with different phenotypes.

Authors:  Yi Li; Lei Deng; Shi-Meng Ai; Peng Sang; Jing Yang; Yuan-Lin Xia; Zhi-Bi Zhang; Yun-Xin Fu; Shu-Qun Liu
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.361

6.  Thermostabilization of VPR, a kinetically stable cold adapted subtilase, via multiple proline substitutions into surface loops.

Authors:  K R Óskarsson; A F Sævarsson; M M Kristjánsson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.