Literature DB >> 27485598

Genetic variations in the Hippo signaling pathway and breast cancer risk in African American women in the AMBER Consortium.

Jianmin Zhang, Song Yao1, Qiang Hu2, Qianqian Zhu2, Song Liu2, Kathryn L Lunetta3, Stephen A Haddad4, Nuo Yang, He Shen, Chi-Chen Hong1, Lara Sucheston-Campbell1, Edward A Ruiz-Narvaez4, Jeannette T Bensen5, Melissa A Troester5, Elisa V Bandera6, Lynn Rosenberg3, Christopher A Haiman7, Andrew F Olshan5, Julie R Palmer4, Christine B Ambrosone1.   

Abstract

The Hippo signaling pathway regulates cellular proliferation and survival, thus exerting profound effects on normal cell fate and tumorigenesis. Dysfunction of the Hippo pathway components has been linked with breast cancer stem cell regulation, as well as breast tumor progression and metastasis. TAZ, a key component of the Hippo pathway, is highly expressed in triple negative breast cancer; however, the associations of genetic variations in this important pathway with breast cancer risk remain largely unexplored. Here, we analyzed 8309 germline variants in 15 genes from the Hippo pathway with a total of 3663 cases and 4687 controls from the African American Breast Cancer Epidemiology and Risk Consortium. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated using logistic regression for overall breast cancer, by estrogen receptor (ER) status (1983 ER positive and 1098 ER negative), and for case-only analyses by ER status. The Hippo signaling pathway was significantly associated with ER-negative breast cancer (pathway level P = 0.02). Gene-based analyses revealed that CDH1 was responsible for the pathway association (P < 0.01), with rs4783673 in CDH1 statistically significant after gene-level adjustment for multiple comparisons (P = 9.2×10(-5), corrected P = 0.02). rs142697907 in PTPN14 was associated with ER-positive breast cancer and rs2456773 in CDK1 with ER-negativity in case-only analysis after gene-level correction for multiple comparisons (corrected P < 0.05). In conclusion, common genetic variations in the Hippo signaling pathway may contribute to both ER-negative and ER+ breast cancer risk in AA women.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27485598      PMCID: PMC5035397          DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgw077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  56 in total

1.  Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Alkes L Price; Nick J Patterson; Robert M Plenge; Michael E Weinblatt; Nancy A Shadick; David Reich
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-07-23       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Multiple testing corrections for imputed SNPs.

Authors:  Xiaoyi Gao
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 2.135

3.  Differential expression of E-cadherin in lobular and ductal neoplasms of the breast and its biologic and diagnostic implications.

Authors:  G Acs; T J Lawton; T R Rebbeck; V A LiVolsi; P J Zhang
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles.

Authors:  Aravind Subramanian; Pablo Tamayo; Vamsi K Mootha; Sayan Mukherjee; Benjamin L Ebert; Michael A Gillette; Amanda Paulovich; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Quality control and quality assurance in genotypic data for genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Cathy C Laurie; Kimberly F Doheny; Daniel B Mirel; Elizabeth W Pugh; Laura J Bierut; Tushar Bhangale; Frederick Boehm; Neil E Caporaso; Marilyn C Cornelis; Howard J Edenberg; Stacy B Gabriel; Emily L Harris; Frank B Hu; Kevin B Jacobs; Peter Kraft; Maria Teresa Landi; Thomas Lumley; Teri A Manolio; Caitlin McHugh; Ian Painter; Justin Paschall; John P Rice; Kenneth M Rice; Xiuwen Zheng; Bruce S Weir
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.135

6.  A collaborative study of the etiology of breast cancer subtypes in African American women: the AMBER consortium.

Authors:  Julie R Palmer; Christine B Ambrosone; Andrew F Olshan
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  TAZ is required for metastatic activity and chemoresistance of breast cancer stem cells.

Authors:  M Bartucci; R Dattilo; C Moriconi; A Pagliuca; M Mottolese; G Federici; A Di Benedetto; M Todaro; G Stassi; F Sperati; M I Amabile; E Pilozzi; M Patrizii; M Biffoni; M Maugeri-Saccà; S Piccolo; R De Maria
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  Conducting Molecular Epidemiological Research in the Age of HIPAA: A Multi-Institutional Case-Control Study of Breast Cancer in African-American and European-American Women.

Authors:  Christine B Ambrosone; Gregory L Ciupak; Elisa V Bandera; Lina Jandorf; Dana H Bovbjerg; Gary Zirpoli; Karen Pawlish; James Godbold; Helena Furberg; Anne Fatone; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Song Yao; Yulin Li; Helena Hwang; Warren Davis; Michelle Roberts; Lara Sucheston; Kitaw Demissie; Kandace L Amend; Paul Tartter; James Reilly; Benjamin W Pace; Thomas Rohan; Joseph Sparano; George Raptis; Maria Castaldi; Alison Estabrook; Sheldon Feldman; Christina Weltz; Margaret Kemeny
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2009-10-25       Impact factor: 4.375

9.  An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes.

Authors:  Goncalo R Abecasis; Adam Auton; Lisa D Brooks; Mark A DePristo; Richard M Durbin; Robert E Handsaker; Hyun Min Kang; Gabor T Marth; Gil A McVean
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Rethinking sources of representative controls for the conduct of case-control studies in minority populations.

Authors:  Elisa V Bandera; Urmila Chandran; Gary Zirpoli; Susan E McCann; Gregory Ciupak; Christine B Ambrosone
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  6 in total

1.  Exploring drivers of gene expression in the Cancer Genome Atlas.

Authors:  Andrea Rau; Michael Flister; Hallgeir Rui; Paul L Auer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Genetic variation in the Hippo pathway and breast cancer risk in women of African ancestry.

Authors:  Shengfeng Wang; Dezheng Huo; Temidayo O Ogundiran; Oladosu Ojengbede; Wei Zheng; Katherine L Nathanson; Barbara Nemesure; Stefan Ambs; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Yonglan Zheng
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 4.784

Review 3.  Common Genetic Variation and Breast Cancer Risk-Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Jenna Lilyquist; Kathryn J Ruddy; Celine M Vachon; Fergus J Couch
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 4.  The Role of the Hippo Pathway in Breast Cancer Carcinogenesis, Prognosis, and Treatment: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Anastasios Kyriazoglou; Michalis Liontos; Roubini Zakopoulou; Maria Kaparelou; Anna Tsiara; Alkistis Maria Papatheodoridi; Rebecca Georgakopoulou; Flora Zagouri
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Cancer stem cells: Culprits in endocrine resistance and racial disparities in breast cancer outcomes.

Authors:  Nicole Mavingire; Petreena Campbell; Jonathan Wooten; Joyce Aja; Melissa B Davis; Andrea Loaiza-Perez; Eileen Brantley
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 8.679

6.  Inferring miRNA sponge co-regulation of protein-protein interactions in human breast cancer.

Authors:  Junpeng Zhang; Thuc Duy Le; Lin Liu; Jiuyong Li
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.