| Literature DB >> 27485515 |
Le-Ping Yan1,2, Joana Silva-Correia1,2, Viviana P Ribeiro1,2, Vera Miranda-Gonçalves2,3, Cristina Correia1,2, Alain da Silva Morais1,2, Rui A Sousa1,2, Rui M Reis2,3,4, Ana L Oliveira1,2,5, Joaquim M Oliveira1,2, Rui L Reis1,2.
Abstract
Protein-based hydrogels with distinct conformations which enable encapsulation or differentiation of cells are of great interest in 3D cancer research models. Conformational changes may cause macroscopic shifts in the hydrogels, allowing for its use as biosensors and drug carriers. In depth knowledge on how 3D conformational changes in proteins may affect cell fate and tumor formation is required. Thus, this study reports an enzymatically crosslinked silk fibroin (SF) hydrogel system that can undergo intrinsic conformation changes from random coil to β-sheet conformation. In random coil status, the SF hydrogels are transparent, elastic, and present ionic strength and pH stimuli-responses. The random coil hydrogels become β-sheet conformation after 10 days in vitro incubation and 14 days in vivo subcutaneous implantation in rat. When encapsulated with ATDC-5 cells, the random coil SF hydrogel promotes cell survival up to 7 days, whereas the subsequent β-sheet transition induces cell apoptosis in vitro. HeLa cells are further incorporated in SF hydrogels and the constructs are investigated in vitro and in an in vivo chick chorioallantoic membrane model for tumor formation. In vivo, Angiogenesis and tumor formation are suppressed in SF hydrogels. Therefore, these hydrogels provide new insights for cancer research and uses of biomaterials.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27485515 PMCID: PMC4971568 DOI: 10.1038/srep31037
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1SF hydrogel structural analysis, optical absorbance and response to stimuli.
(a) ATR-FTIR spectra for the aqueous SF solution, SF/HRP/H2O2 mixture before gelling, and after SF hydrogel formation. (b) Visible light absorbance for the SF/HRP/H2O2 before gelling and for formed SF hydrogel, respectively. (c) Shape memory property for the SF hydrogels tested by alternatively immersing the hydrogel disc in distilled water and PBS (Scale bar: 1 cm). (d) SF hydrogel response to changing ionic strengths. Left: Diameter changes during the alternate immersion in distilled water (I) and PBS (n = 5). Right: Wet weight variation during alternative immersion in 2.0 M (III) and 0.154 M sodium chloride solutions (both of pH 7.4) (n = 5). (e) SF hydrogel pH response. Left: Wet weight variation after immersion in solutions of different pH values for 2 hours, respectively (n = 5). Right: Wet weight variation during the alternate immersion in basic (pH 10.5, V) and acid (pH 3.0, VI) sodium chloride solutions (n = 6). ****P < 0.0001.
Figure 2Gelling time and SF hydrogel mechanical properties.
(a) The HRP and H2O2 influence on the hydrogel gelling time. (b,c) the HRP and H2O2 effects on the storage contents and the hydrogel’s loss modulus, respectively. In (a–c), Left: H2O2/Silk was fixed at 1.10‰ (wt/wt); Right: HRP/Silk was fixed at 0.26‰ (wt/wt). (d) hydrogel representative frequency and strain sweeping. (a–c: n = 5). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ****P < 0.0001.
Figure 3In vitro conformation evaluation and cell encapsulation studies and in vivo subcutaneous implantation for the SF hydrogels.
(a) SF hydrogel transmission electron micrographs after incubation in PBS at 37 °C for 1 (left) and 10 days (right). The black arrows indicate nanofibrils and the red arrows indicate nanofibrils aggregates (Scale bar:200 nm). (b) Macroscopic images of explants retrieved after 2 weeks of subcutaneous implantation (scale bar: 5 mm). (c) SF hydrogel ATR-FTIR spectra after 2 weeks of implantation. SF solution: 16 wt. %; Silk/HRP: 0.26‰ (wt/wt). (d) Cell viability after encapsulation analyzed by MTS assay (n = 9). (e) Live/dead staining for the ATDC-5 cells whithin the SF hydrogels from 1 to 10 days (scale bar: 100 μm). (f) H&E staining of the explants (scale bar: 400 μm). **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.
Figure 4HeLa cell encapsulation and SF hydrogel anti-angiogenic effect.
(a) Cell proliferation and viability measured by (a) ATP assay and (b) DNA quantification, respectively, for SF hydrogel with encapsulated HeLa cells after 1, 7, 10 and 14 days of culture (n = 9). (c) storage modulus for the cancerous cell laden-hydrogels, tested by dynamic mechanical analysis (n = 3). Control Day 1 and Control Day 10: hydrogels without cells encapsulated freshly prepared and 10 days post-preparation; HeLa Day 1 and HeLa Day 10: hydrogels encapsulated with HeLa cells for one day and ten days, respectively. (d) H&E staining, SNA-lectin and Ki-67 immunohistochemical analysis and fluoresence TUNEL assay of the excised section from the CAM study (scale bar: 200 μm). **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Comparison of SF hydrogels.
| Ref. | Method | Shortest gelation time | Modulus (kPa) | Main conformation | SF concentration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Storing SF solution at 4 °C | ~3 days | — | β-sheet | 2 wt.% | |
| Addition of glycerol in SF solution | ~2 days | — | β-sheet | 2 wt.% | |
| Addition of citric acid in SF solution and storing at 50 °C | Overnight | — | β-sheet | 2 wt.% | |
| Increasing SF concentration or temperature, decreasing pH, addition of ions, or polyethylene glycol | <1 day | ~200–6000 (C) | β-sheet | 4–20 wt.% | |
| Freezing the SF solution with organic solvents at −20 °C | > 6 hours | ~3–50 (C) | β-sheet | 6 wt.% | |
| Sonication treatment on SF solution | >0.5 hour | 369–1712 (C) | β-sheet | 4–12 wt.% | |
| Vortex treatment on SF solution | ~35 minutes | 0.1–70 (S) | β-sheet | 1.3–5.2 wt.% | |
| Electrical (direct current) treatment on SF solution | ~3 minutes | ~1 (S) | Amorphous | 8.4 wt.% | |
| Addition of ethylene glycol diglycidyl ether in SF solution at 50 °C | Within 2 hours | 0.01–100 (S) | β-sheet | 4.2 wt.% | |
| Addition of sodium dodecyl sulfate in SF solution | ~15 minutes | — | β-sheet | 4% (wt/vol) | |
| Addition of methylcellulose in SF solution at 50 °C | ~40 hours | — | β-sheet | 2 wt.% | |
| Freezing the SF solution, and then immersion them in ethanol | Overnight | — | β-sheet | 5 wt.% | |
| HRP mediated crosslinking of SF solution | 1 hour | 0.2–10 (S) | Random coil | 1–6 wt.% |
Ref.: reference; (C): compressive modulus; (S): storage modulus tested in rheometer.
aAqueous SF solution was mixed with cells (final concentration: 0.5 million/mL). The mixture would gel in 0.5–2 hours. The compression modulus was tested without cells.
bThe hydrogels was allowed to cure for 1 hour at 37 °C for cell seeding, while the shortest gelling time was not mentioned.