| Literature DB >> 27484985 |
Hao Liang1, Yi Chen Guo2, Li Ming Chen2, Min Li2, Wei Zhong Han2, Xu Zhang3, Shi Liang Jiang4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated that elevated admission and fasting glucose (FG) is associated with worse outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, the quantitative relationship between FG levels and in-hospital mortality in patients with AMI remains unknown. The aim of the study is to assess the prevalence of elevated FG levels in hospitalized Chinese patients with AMI and diabetes mellitus and to determine the quantitative relationship between FG levels and the in-hospital mortality as well as the optimal level of FG in patients with AMI and diabetes mellitus.Entities:
Keywords: Diabetes mellitus; Glucose; Mortality; Myocardial infarction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27484985 PMCID: PMC4969715 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-016-0331-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.298
Baseline characters in patients with fasting glucose <100 mg/dL and ≥ 100 mg/dL
| Variables | Normal FG ( | Elevated FG ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y) | 61.7 ± 11.6 | 64.5 ± 11.2 | <0.001 |
| hospital stays (d) | 9.6 ± 3.4 | 9.5 ± 3.4 | 0.677 |
| TC(mg/dl) | 192.5 ± 40.9 | 197.6 ± 46.6 | 0.013 |
| Females | 192 (22.2) | 363(36.6) | <0.001 |
| Hypertension | 347(40.2) | 452 (45.5) | 0.021 |
| Cigarette smoking | 509 (59.0) | 416 (41.9) | <0.001 |
| Previous angina pectoris | 551(63.8) | 660(66.5) | 0.237 |
| Previous myocardial infarction | 78(9.0) | 95 (9.6) | 0.696 |
| Family history of CAD | 208 (24.1) | 205 (20.6) | 0.074 |
| Patients with Killip class ≥ III | 46(5.3) | 89 (9.0) | 0.003 |
Data are mean values ± SD or number (%)
FG fasting glucose, TC total cholesterol, CAD coronary artery disease
In-hospital management in patients with fasting glucose <100 mg/dL and ≥ 100 mg/dL
| In-hospital Management | Normal FG ( | Elevated FG ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Reperfusion therapy | 359 (41.6) | 349 (35.1) | 0.004 |
| Thrombolysis | 158 (18.3) | 132 (13.3) | 0.003 |
| Primary PCI | 201 (23.3) | 217 (21.9) | 0.46 |
| Antiplatelets | 847(98.1) | 968 (97.5) | 0.332 |
| Nitrates | 852 (98.7) | 975 (98.2) | 0.351 |
| β-receptor blockers | 610 (70.7) | 664 (66.9) | 0.077 |
| ACEI or ARB | 663 (76.8) | 746 (75.1) | 0.393 |
| Statins | 668 (77.4) | 816 (82.2) | 0.010 |
| Heparins | 787 (91.2) | 900 (90.6) | 0.676 |
PCI percutaneous coronary intervention, ACEI angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ARB angiotensin receptor blocker, GIK glucose-insulin-potassium
In-hospital Adverse Events in Patients with Fasting Glucose <100 mg/dL and ≥ 100 mg/dL
| In-hospital adverse events | Normal FG ( | Elevated FG ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Unstable angina pectoris | 341 (39.5) | 363 (36.6) | 0.190 |
| Reinfarction | 15(1.7) | 24 (2.4) | 0.309 |
| Congestive heart failure | 139 (16.1) | 215 (21.7) | 0.002 |
| Total mortality | 48 (5.6) | 107 (10.8) | <0.001 |
Fig. 1In-hospital mortality and fasting glucose. Figure 1 showed the relationship between FG levels and in-hospital mortality in all patients with AMI and diabetes mellitus. Chi-square analysis was used to test the difference in mortality between patients with a FG level of 80–89.9 mg/dL and any of the other patient groups with different FG levels. The in-hospital mortality was the lowest in patients with a FG level of 80–89.9 mg/dL and increased continuously with the increase in FG levels when FG was ≥100 mg/dL. However, the mortality tended to increase again when FG was <80 mg/dL. # P < 0.05, * P < 0.01, ** P < 0.001. FG: fasting glucose; AMI: acute myocardial infarction
Fig. 2In-hospital mortality and fasting glucose levels. Spearman rank correlation between FG levels and in-hospital mortality in all patients with AMI and diabetes mellitus. There was a high correlation between the two parameters (r = 0.830, P < 0.001). However, the relationship showed a J-curve configuration and the mortality rose again when FG was <80 mg/dL. FG: fasting glucose; AMI: acute myocardial infarction
Results of logistic regression analysis in all patients
| Factors | OR (95 % CI) |
|
|---|---|---|
| Age | 1.10 (1.08–1.13) | <0.001 |
| Gender | 0.79 (0.50–1.25) | 0.307 |
| Fasting glucose | 1.19 (1.12–1.26) | <0.001 |
| TC | 1.14 (0.93–1.39) | 0.204 |
| Cigarette smoking | 1.50 (0.97–2.33) | 0.068 |
| Hypertension | 1.83 (1.23–2.73) | 0.003 |
| Killip classification | 3.48 (2.80–4.32) | <0.001 |
| Reperfusion therapy | 0.59 (0.42–0.83) | 0.003 |
| Statins | 1.04 (0.53–2.02) | 0.918 |
OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval
Results of logistic regression analysis in patients with different fasting glucose levels
| Factors | FG <80 mg/dL ( | FG 80–100 mg/dL ( | FG ≥ 100 mg/dL ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95 % CI) | OR (95 % CI) | OR (95 % CI) | |
| Age | 1.08 (1.02–1.15)** | 1.12 (1.06–1.18)** | 1.11 (1.07–1.15)** |
| Gender | 0.20 (0.02–1.82)# | 076 (0.28–20.6)# | 0.93 (0.52–1.67)# |
| Fasting glucose | 0.13 (0.03–0.63)* | 1.72 (0.46–6.50)# | 1.25 (1.16–1.35)** |
| TC | 1.08 (0.49–2.37)# | 1.27 (0.80–2.00)# | 1.11 (0.87–1.41)# |
| Cigarette smoking | 2.22 (0.52–9.46)# | 1.14 (0.46–2.81)# | 1.56 (0.89–2.75)# |
| Hypertension | 2.89 (0.88–9.51)# | 2.47 (1.07–5.74)* | 1.54 (0.92–2.57)# |
| Killip classification | 4.93 (2.35–10.33)** | 2.21 (1.37–3.56)** | 4.06 (3.05–5.40)** |
| Reperfusion therapy | 0.54 (0.20–1.48)# | 0.66 (0.35–1.26)# | 0.61 (0.38–0.98)* |
| Statins | 1.11 (0.19–6.49)# | 1.23 (0.30–4.94)# | 1.08 (0.44–2.67)# |
#P > 0.05, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01