Hiroshige Yamabe1, Hisanori Kanazawa2, Miwa Ito2, Shozo Kaneko2, Hisao Ogawa2. 1. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto City, Japan. Electronic address: yyamabe@kumamoto-u.ac.jp. 2. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto City, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether atrial fibrillation (AF) is maintained by the rotor. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the role of the rotor and examined its mechanism. METHODS: Among 75 patients with AF (60 paroxysmal, 15 persistent AF) who underwent 3-dimensional noncontact left atrial mapping during AF, we examined the prevalence and location of rotor activation and elucidated its mechanism. Catheter ablation was performed in a stepwise fashion (linear roof lesion and complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation after pulmonary vein [PV) isolation) until AF termination. RESULTS: Rotor activation was observed in 11 patients (14.7%; 10 paroxysmal and 1 persistent AF) (tachycardia cycle length 160.0 ± 19.8 ms). Rotors were observed transiently (duration 6128 ± 9094 ms) during AF at the roof (n = 5), septum (n = 3), and ostium of the left superior PV (n = 3). Five rotors circulated in clockwise and 6 in counterclockwise directions. The length of the block line at the center of the rotor was 15.2 ± 6.9 mm. The electrograms at the block line showed low-amplitude multiple deflections (n = 7) or double potentials (n = 4), and the amplitudes during rotor activation were significantly lower than those during sinus rhythm (0.27 ± 0.18 mV vs 1.22 ± 0.92 mV; P < .01). No conduction disturbances were found during sinus rhythm, suggesting that the central line of block was formed functionally. AF was terminated by PV isolation alone without additional lesions in patients with rotors. CONCLUSION: Functionally formed rotor activation was observed during AF in a limited number of patients. These rotor activations may not be related to AF maintenance, but rather may reflect a transient organization of random propagation.
BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether atrial fibrillation (AF) is maintained by the rotor. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the role of the rotor and examined its mechanism. METHODS: Among 75 patients with AF (60 paroxysmal, 15 persistent AF) who underwent 3-dimensional noncontact left atrial mapping during AF, we examined the prevalence and location of rotor activation and elucidated its mechanism. Catheter ablation was performed in a stepwise fashion (linear roof lesion and complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation after pulmonary vein [PV) isolation) until AF termination. RESULTS: Rotor activation was observed in 11 patients (14.7%; 10 paroxysmal and 1 persistent AF) (tachycardia cycle length 160.0 ± 19.8 ms). Rotors were observed transiently (duration 6128 ± 9094 ms) during AF at the roof (n = 5), septum (n = 3), and ostium of the left superior PV (n = 3). Five rotors circulated in clockwise and 6 in counterclockwise directions. The length of the block line at the center of the rotor was 15.2 ± 6.9 mm. The electrograms at the block line showed low-amplitude multiple deflections (n = 7) or double potentials (n = 4), and the amplitudes during rotor activation were significantly lower than those during sinus rhythm (0.27 ± 0.18 mV vs 1.22 ± 0.92 mV; P < .01). No conduction disturbances were found during sinus rhythm, suggesting that the central line of block was formed functionally. AF was terminated by PV isolation alone without additional lesions in patients with rotors. CONCLUSION: Functionally formed rotor activation was observed during AF in a limited number of patients. These rotor activations may not be related to AF maintenance, but rather may reflect a transient organization of random propagation.
Authors: Philipp Halbfass; Patrick Müller; Karin Nentwich; Kai Sonne; Karsten Hamm; Sebastian Barth; Franziska Fochler; Andreas Mügge; Thomas Deneke Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2017-03-31 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Rui Shi; Zhong Chen; Charlie Butcher; Junaid Ab Zaman; Vennela Boyalla; Yi Kan Wang; Omar Riad; Anitha Sathishkumar; Mark Norman; Shouvik Haldar; David G Jones; Wajid Hussain; Vias Markides; Tom Wong Journal: J Arrhythm Date: 2020-05-20
Authors: Gavin S Chu; Xin Li; Peter J Stafford; Frederique J Vanheusden; João L Salinet; Tiago P Almeida; Nawshin Dastagir; Alastair J Sandilands; Paulus Kirchhof; Fernando S Schlindwein; G André Ng Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2022-03-16 Impact factor: 4.755
Authors: Mahmoud Ehnesh; Xin Li; Tiago P Almeida; Gavin S Chu; Nawshin Dastagir; Peter J Stafford; G André Ng; Fernando S Schlindwein Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2022-08-05 Impact factor: 4.755