Literature DB >> 27484491

Investigation of mechanisms of vagus nerve stimulation for seizure using finite element modeling.

Jeffrey E Arle1, Kristen W Carlson2, Longzhi Mei3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: While the efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) to reduce seizures in pharmaco-resistant patients is clinically proven, its efficacy and side effects mechanisms are not fully understood. Our goals were 1) to use a finite element model (FEM) and axon models to examine different fiber activation and blocking thresholds and 2) examine fiber activation and blocking in three fiber groups likely to be responsible for efficacy and side effects.
METHODS: Using FEM, we examined the field potential along axons within a vagus nerve model with fascicles. These data were input to a computational fiber model to estimate numbers of axons activated across all diameters. We estimated numbers of activated and blocked fibers by diameter.
RESULTS: 1) At the low end of VNS amplitudes, little efficacy for seizure control is appreciated while large Aβ fibers associated with the recurrent laryngeal nerve are recruited. As amplitudes are increased, Aβ fibers can produce hoarseness, and next recruited are fast B fibers associated with the aortic fascicle. We hypothesize these B fibers are the source of efficacy in treating seizure. As amplitudes are further increased, coughing may occur, possibly due to recruitment of smaller and deeper pulmonary fibers. 2) Clinical parameters are in a range that could cause inadvertent blocking at the cathode and activation at the anode. Conversely, innovative approaches to field shape and charge-balancing can allow controlled fiber activation at the cathode for maximum activation of the fibers responsible for efficacy, and possibly blocking at the anode to minimize side effects and expand therapeutic range. In design and operation, the cathode and anode can each be approached as a band pass filter. SIGNIFICANCE: The B fiber group is necessary and possibly sufficient to produce VNS efficacy in epilepsy. This group may emanate from aortic baroreceptors that, via synapses in the solitary tract nucleus, stimulate the locus coeruleus, hypothalamus and other influential targets such as the hippocampus. Responder rates may be increased with a lead that fully encircles the nerve. With better identification of the fiber groups involved in VNS, efficacy, side effects, therapeutic range and responder rates can be optimized.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epilepsy; Finite element modeling; Nucleus tractus solitarius; Seizure; Vagus nerve; Vagus nerve stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27484491     DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2016.07.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsy Res        ISSN: 0920-1211            Impact factor:   3.045


  16 in total

1.  L-PGDS Mediates Vagus Nerve Stimulation-Induced Neuroprotection in a Rat Model of Ischemic Stroke by Suppressing the Apoptotic Response.

Authors:  Lina Zhang; Jingxi Ma; Xinhao Jin; Gongwei Jia; Ying Jiang; Changqing Li
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 3.996

2.  Timing Considerations for Noninvasive Vagal Nerve Stimulation in Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Nil Z Gurel; Asim H Gazi; Kristine L Scott; Matthew T Wittbrodt; Amit J Shah; Viola Vaccarino; J Douglas Bremner; Omer T Inan
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2020-03-04

3.  Defining the neural fulcrum for chronic vagus nerve stimulation: implications for integrated cardiac control.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Ardell; Heath Nier; Matthew Hammer; E Marie Southerland; Christopher L Ardell; Eric Beaumont; Bruce H KenKnight; J Andrew Armour
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-09-30       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  Electrical stimulation of cranial nerves in cognition and disease.

Authors:  Devin Adair; Dennis Truong; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Nigel Gebodh; Helen Borges; Libby Ho; J Douglas Bremner; Bashar W Badran; Vitaly Napadow; Vincent P Clark; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-02-23       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Alpha7 Subunit Mediates Vagus Nerve Stimulation-Induced Neuroprotection in Acute Permanent Cerebral Ischemia by a7nAchR/JAK2 Pathway.

Authors:  Xin-Xin Lu; Zhong-Qiu Hong; Zhi Tan; Ming-Hong Sui; Zhi-Qiang Zhuang; Hui-Hua Liu; Xiu-Yuan Zheng; Tie-Bin Yan; Deng-Feng Geng; Dong-Mei Jin
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-12-23

6.  A computational outlook on neurostimulation.

Authors:  Marco Capogrosso; Scott F Lempka
Journal:  Bioelectron Med       Date:  2020-05-25

7.  Flat electrode contacts for vagus nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Jesse E Bucksot; Andrew J Wells; Kimiya C Rahebi; Vishnoukumaar Sivaji; Mario Romero-Ortega; Michael P Kilgard; Robert L Rennaker; Seth A Hays
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  High-Resolution Multi-Scale Computational Model for Non-Invasive Cervical Vagus Nerve Stimulation.

Authors:  Antonios P Mourdoukoutas; Dennis Q Truong; Devin K Adair; Bruce J Simon; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2017-10-27

9.  Modeling Current Sources for Neural Stimulation in COMSOL.

Authors:  Nicole A Pelot; Brandon J Thio; Warren M Grill
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  Anodal block permits directional vagus nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Umair Ahmed; Yao-Chuan Chang; Marina Cracchiolo; Maria F Lopez; Jacquelyn N Tomaio; Timir Datta-Chaudhuri; Theodoros P Zanos; Loren Rieth; Yousef Al-Abed; Stavros Zanos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.