Literature DB >> 27483066

Association Between Off-site Central Monitoring Using Standardized Cardiac Telemetry and Clinical Outcomes Among Non-Critically Ill Patients.

Daniel J Cantillon1, Molly Loy2, Alicia Burkle2, Shannon Pengel2, Deborah Brosovich2, Aaron Hamilton3, Umesh N Khot1, Bruce D Lindsay1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Telemetry alarms involving traditional on-site monitoring rarely alter management and often miss serious events, sometimes resulting in death. Poor patient selection contributes to a high alarm volume with low clinical yield.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcomes associated with an off-site central monitoring unit (CMU) applying standardized cardiac telemetry indications using electronic order entry. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: All non-intensive care unit (ICU) patients at Cleveland Clinic and 3 regional hospitals over 13 months between March 4, 2014, and April 4, 2015. EXPOSURES: An off-site CMU applied standardized cardiac telemetry when ordered for standard indications, such as for known or suspected tachyarrhythmias or bradyarrhythmias. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: CMU detection and notification of rhythm/rate alarms occurring 1 hour or less prior to emergency response team (ERT) activation, direct CMU-to-ERT notification outcomes, total telemetry census, and cardiopulmonary arrests in comparison with the previous 13 months.
RESULTS: The CMU received electronic telemetry orders for 99,048 patients (main campus, 72,199 [73%]) and provided 410,534 notifications (48% arrhythmia/hemodynamic) among 61 nursing units. ERT activation occurred among 3243 patients, including 979 patients (30%) with rhythm/rate changes occurring 1 hour or less prior to the ERT activation. The CMU detected and provided accurate notification for 772 (79%) of those events. In addition, the CMU provided discretionary direct ERT notification for 105 patients (ventricular tachycardia, n = 44; pause/asystole, n = 36; polymorphic ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation, n = 14; other, n = 11), including advance warning of 27 cardiopulmonary arrest events (26%) for which return of circulation was achieved in 25 patients (93%). Telemetry standardization was associated with a mean 15.5% weekly census reduction in the number of non-ICU monitored patients per week when compared with the prior 13-month period (580 vs 670 patients; mean difference, -90 patients [95% CI, -82 to -99]; P < .001). The number of cardiopulmonary arrests was 126 in the 13 months preintervention and 122 postintervention. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among non-critically ill patients, use of standardized cardiac telemetry with an off-site central monitoring unit was associated with detection and notification of cardiac rhythm and rate changes within 1 hour prior to the majority of ERT activations, and also with a reduction in the census of monitored patients, without an increase in cardiopulmonary arrest events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27483066     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.10258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  13 in total

1.  2017 ISHNE-HRS expert consensus statement on ambulatory ECG and external cardiac monitoring/telemetry.

Authors:  Jonathan S Steinberg; Niraj Varma; Iwona Cygankiewicz; Peter Aziz; Paweł Balsam; Adrian Baranchuk; Daniel J Cantillon; Polychronis Dilaveris; Sergio J Dubner; Nabil El-Sherif; Jaroslaw Krol; Malgorzata Kurpesa; Maria Teresa La Rovere; Suave S Lobodzinski; Emanuela T Locati; Suneet Mittal; Brian Olshansky; Ewa Piotrowicz; Leslie Saxon; Peter H Stone; Larisa Tereshchenko; Mintu P Turakhia; Gioia Turitto; Neil J Wimmer; Richard L Verrier; Wojciech Zareba; Ryszard Piotrowicz
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS/ACC/AHA worldwide practice update for telehealth and arrhythmia monitoring during and after a pandemic.

Authors:  Niraj Varma; Nassir F Marrouche; Luis Aguinaga; Christine M Albert; Elena Arbelo; Jong-Il Choi; Mina K Chung; Giulio Conte; Lilas Dagher; Laurence M Epstein; Hamid Ghanbari; Janet K Han; Hein Heidbuchel; He Huang; Dhanunjaya R Lakkireddy; Tachapong Ngarmukos; Andrea M Russo; Eduardo B Saad; Luis C Saenz Morales; Kristin E Sandau; Arun Raghav M Sridhar; Eric C Stecker; Paul D Varosy
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 5.214

3.  Measuring overuse of continuous pulse oximetry in bronchiolitis and developing strategies for large-scale deimplementation: study protocol for a feasibility trial.

Authors:  Irit R Rasooly; Rinad S Beidas; Courtney Benjamin Wolk; Frances Barg; Christopher P Landrigan; Amanda Schondelmeyer; Patrick W Brady; Lisa M McLeod; Christopher P Bonafide
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2019-05-15

4.  Interventions to Decrease Overuse of Cardiac Monitoring (Telemetry) When Transitioning from the Intensive Care Unit to the Regular Nursing Floor.

Authors:  Johnny Chahine; Bicky Thapa; Falgun Gosai; Bahaa Abdelghaffar; Suleiman I Al Ashi; Anjli Maroo; Narendrakumar Alappan; K V Gopalakrishna
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-03-25

5.  Indication-specific event rates among hospitalized patients undergoing continuous cardiac monitoring.

Authors:  Daniel J Cantillon; Alicia Burkle; Desiree Kirkwood; Molly Loy; Ram Amuthan; Shannon Pengel; John Tote; William Morris; Penny L Houghtaling; Aaron C Hamilton; Marc Petre; Umesh N Khot; Bruce D Lindsay
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 2.882

6.  Monitor-Watcher Use, Nurses' Knowledge of Electrocardiographic Monitoring, and Arrhythmia Detection.

Authors:  Marjorie Funk; Kristopher P Fennie; Krista A Knudson; Halley Ruppel
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.228

7.  Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Non-ICU Hospitalization for COVID-19 in a Nonepicenter, Centrally Monitored Healthcare System.

Authors:  David M Nemer; Bryan R Wilner; Alicia Burkle; Jose Aguilera; Joseph Adewumi; Carl Gillombardo; Oussama Wazni; Venu Menon; Shannon Pengel; Meredith Foxx; Marc Petre; Aaron C Hamilton; Daniel J Cantillon
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.960

8.  HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS/ACC/AHA Worldwide Practice Update for Telehealth and Arrhythmia Monitoring During and After a Pandemic.

Authors:  Niraj Varma; Nassir F Marrouche; Luis Aguinaga; Christine M Albert; Elena Arbelo; Jong-Il Choi; Mina K Chung; Giulio Conte; Lilas Dagher; Laurence M Epstein; Hamid Ghanbari; Janet K Han; Hein Heidbuchel; He Huang; Dhanunjaya R Lakkireddy; Tachapong Ngarmukos; Andrea M Russo; Eduardo B Saad; Luis C Saenz Morales; Kristin E Sandau; Arun Raghav M Sridhar; Eric C Stecker; Paul D Varosy
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 9.  HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS/ACC/AHA Worldwide Practice Update for Telehealth and Arrhythmia Monitoring During and After a Pandemic.

Authors:  Niraj Varma; Nassir F Marrouche; Luis Aguinaga; Christine M Albert; Elena Arbelo; Jong-Il Choi; Mina K Chung; Giulio Conte; Lilas Dagher; Laurence M Epstein; Hamid Ghanbari; Janet K Han; Hein Heidbuchel; He Huang; Dhanunjaya R Lakkireddy; Tachapong Ngarmukos; Andrea M Russo; Eduardo B Saad; Luis C Saenz Morales; Kristin E Sandau; Arun Raghav M Sridhar; Eric C Stecker; Paul D Varosy
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-07-21

10.  Is atrial fibrillation a risk factor for in-hospital cardiac arrest?: a Swedish retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Alexander Ryden; Johan Engdahl; Andreas Claesson; Per Nordberg; Mattias Ringh; Jacob Hollenberg; Therese Djärv
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.