IMPORTANCE: Telemetry alarms involving traditional on-site monitoring rarely alter management and often miss serious events, sometimes resulting in death. Poor patient selection contributes to a high alarm volume with low clinical yield. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcomes associated with an off-site central monitoring unit (CMU) applying standardized cardiac telemetry indications using electronic order entry. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: All non-intensive care unit (ICU) patients at Cleveland Clinic and 3 regional hospitals over 13 months between March 4, 2014, and April 4, 2015. EXPOSURES: An off-site CMU applied standardized cardiac telemetry when ordered for standard indications, such as for known or suspected tachyarrhythmias or bradyarrhythmias. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: CMU detection and notification of rhythm/rate alarms occurring 1 hour or less prior to emergency response team (ERT) activation, direct CMU-to-ERT notification outcomes, total telemetry census, and cardiopulmonary arrests in comparison with the previous 13 months. RESULTS: The CMU received electronic telemetry orders for 99,048 patients (main campus, 72,199 [73%]) and provided 410,534 notifications (48% arrhythmia/hemodynamic) among 61 nursing units. ERT activation occurred among 3243 patients, including 979 patients (30%) with rhythm/rate changes occurring 1 hour or less prior to the ERT activation. The CMU detected and provided accurate notification for 772 (79%) of those events. In addition, the CMU provided discretionary direct ERT notification for 105 patients (ventricular tachycardia, n = 44; pause/asystole, n = 36; polymorphic ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation, n = 14; other, n = 11), including advance warning of 27 cardiopulmonary arrest events (26%) for which return of circulation was achieved in 25 patients (93%). Telemetry standardization was associated with a mean 15.5% weekly census reduction in the number of non-ICU monitored patients per week when compared with the prior 13-month period (580 vs 670 patients; mean difference, -90 patients [95% CI, -82 to -99]; P < .001). The number of cardiopulmonary arrests was 126 in the 13 months preintervention and 122 postintervention. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among non-critically ill patients, use of standardized cardiac telemetry with an off-site central monitoring unit was associated with detection and notification of cardiac rhythm and rate changes within 1 hour prior to the majority of ERT activations, and also with a reduction in the census of monitored patients, without an increase in cardiopulmonary arrest events.
IMPORTANCE: Telemetry alarms involving traditional on-site monitoring rarely alter management and often miss serious events, sometimes resulting in death. Poor patient selection contributes to a high alarm volume with low clinical yield. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcomes associated with an off-site central monitoring unit (CMU) applying standardized cardiac telemetry indications using electronic order entry. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: All non-intensive care unit (ICU) patients at Cleveland Clinic and 3 regional hospitals over 13 months between March 4, 2014, and April 4, 2015. EXPOSURES: An off-site CMU applied standardized cardiac telemetry when ordered for standard indications, such as for known or suspected tachyarrhythmias or bradyarrhythmias. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: CMU detection and notification of rhythm/rate alarms occurring 1 hour or less prior to emergency response team (ERT) activation, direct CMU-to-ERT notification outcomes, total telemetry census, and cardiopulmonary arrests in comparison with the previous 13 months. RESULTS: The CMU received electronic telemetry orders for 99,048 patients (main campus, 72,199 [73%]) and provided 410,534 notifications (48% arrhythmia/hemodynamic) among 61 nursing units. ERT activation occurred among 3243 patients, including 979 patients (30%) with rhythm/rate changes occurring 1 hour or less prior to the ERT activation. The CMU detected and provided accurate notification for 772 (79%) of those events. In addition, the CMU provided discretionary direct ERT notification for 105 patients (ventricular tachycardia, n = 44; pause/asystole, n = 36; polymorphic ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation, n = 14; other, n = 11), including advance warning of 27 cardiopulmonary arrest events (26%) for which return of circulation was achieved in 25 patients (93%). Telemetry standardization was associated with a mean 15.5% weekly census reduction in the number of non-ICU monitored patients per week when compared with the prior 13-month period (580 vs 670 patients; mean difference, -90 patients [95% CI, -82 to -99]; P < .001). The number of cardiopulmonary arrests was 126 in the 13 months preintervention and 122 postintervention. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among non-critically ill patients, use of standardized cardiac telemetry with an off-site central monitoring unit was associated with detection and notification of cardiac rhythm and rate changes within 1 hour prior to the majority of ERT activations, and also with a reduction in the census of monitored patients, without an increase in cardiopulmonary arrest events.
Authors: Jonathan S Steinberg; Niraj Varma; Iwona Cygankiewicz; Peter Aziz; Paweł Balsam; Adrian Baranchuk; Daniel J Cantillon; Polychronis Dilaveris; Sergio J Dubner; Nabil El-Sherif; Jaroslaw Krol; Malgorzata Kurpesa; Maria Teresa La Rovere; Suave S Lobodzinski; Emanuela T Locati; Suneet Mittal; Brian Olshansky; Ewa Piotrowicz; Leslie Saxon; Peter H Stone; Larisa Tereshchenko; Mintu P Turakhia; Gioia Turitto; Neil J Wimmer; Richard L Verrier; Wojciech Zareba; Ryszard Piotrowicz Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 1.468
Authors: Niraj Varma; Nassir F Marrouche; Luis Aguinaga; Christine M Albert; Elena Arbelo; Jong-Il Choi; Mina K Chung; Giulio Conte; Lilas Dagher; Laurence M Epstein; Hamid Ghanbari; Janet K Han; Hein Heidbuchel; He Huang; Dhanunjaya R Lakkireddy; Tachapong Ngarmukos; Andrea M Russo; Eduardo B Saad; Luis C Saenz Morales; Kristin E Sandau; Arun Raghav M Sridhar; Eric C Stecker; Paul D Varosy Journal: Europace Date: 2021-02-05 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Irit R Rasooly; Rinad S Beidas; Courtney Benjamin Wolk; Frances Barg; Christopher P Landrigan; Amanda Schondelmeyer; Patrick W Brady; Lisa M McLeod; Christopher P Bonafide Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2019-05-15
Authors: Johnny Chahine; Bicky Thapa; Falgun Gosai; Bahaa Abdelghaffar; Suleiman I Al Ashi; Anjli Maroo; Narendrakumar Alappan; K V Gopalakrishna Journal: Cureus Date: 2019-03-25
Authors: Daniel J Cantillon; Alicia Burkle; Desiree Kirkwood; Molly Loy; Ram Amuthan; Shannon Pengel; John Tote; William Morris; Penny L Houghtaling; Aaron C Hamilton; Marc Petre; Umesh N Khot; Bruce D Lindsay Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 2019-08-12 Impact factor: 2.882
Authors: David M Nemer; Bryan R Wilner; Alicia Burkle; Jose Aguilera; Joseph Adewumi; Carl Gillombardo; Oussama Wazni; Venu Menon; Shannon Pengel; Meredith Foxx; Marc Petre; Aaron C Hamilton; Daniel J Cantillon Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2021-01 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Niraj Varma; Nassir F Marrouche; Luis Aguinaga; Christine M Albert; Elena Arbelo; Jong-Il Choi; Mina K Chung; Giulio Conte; Lilas Dagher; Laurence M Epstein; Hamid Ghanbari; Janet K Han; Hein Heidbuchel; He Huang; Dhanunjaya R Lakkireddy; Tachapong Ngarmukos; Andrea M Russo; Eduardo B Saad; Luis C Saenz Morales; Kristin E Sandau; Arun Raghav M Sridhar; Eric C Stecker; Paul D Varosy Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2020-06-11 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Niraj Varma; Nassir F Marrouche; Luis Aguinaga; Christine M Albert; Elena Arbelo; Jong-Il Choi; Mina K Chung; Giulio Conte; Lilas Dagher; Laurence M Epstein; Hamid Ghanbari; Janet K Han; Hein Heidbuchel; He Huang; Dhanunjaya R Lakkireddy; Tachapong Ngarmukos; Andrea M Russo; Eduardo B Saad; Luis C Saenz Morales; Kristin E Sandau; Arun Raghav M Sridhar; Eric C Stecker; Paul D Varosy Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2020-07-21
Authors: Alexander Ryden; Johan Engdahl; Andreas Claesson; Per Nordberg; Mattias Ringh; Jacob Hollenberg; Therese Djärv Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-06-30 Impact factor: 2.692