Literature DB >> 27482732

Calculating the Position of the Joint Line of the Knee Using Anatomical Landmarks.

Gavin C Pereira, Ericka von Kaeppler, Michael J Alaia, Kenneth Montini, Matthew J Lopez, Paul E Di Cesare, Derek F Amanatullah.   

Abstract

Restoration of the joint line of the knee during primary and revision total knee arthroplasty is a step that directly influences patient outcomes. In revision total knee arthroplasty, necessary bony landmarks may be missing or obscured, so there remains a lack of consensus on how to accurately identify and restore the joint line of the knee. In this study, 50 magnetic resonance images of normal knees were analyzed to determine a quantitative relationship between the joint line of the knee and 6 bony landmarks: medial and lateral femoral epicondyles, medial and lateral femoral metaphyseal flares, tibial tubercle, and proximal tibio-fibular joint. Wide variability was found in the absolute distance from each landmark to the joint line of the knee, including significant differences between the sexes. Normalization of the absolute distances to femoral or tibial diameters revealed reliable spatial relationships to the joint line of the knee. The joint line was found to be equidistant from the lateral femoral epicondyle and the proximal tibio-fibular joint, representing a reproducible point of reference for joint line restoration. The authors propose a simple 3-step algorithm that can be used with magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, or radiography to reliably determine the anatomical location of the joint line of the knee relative to the surrounding bony anatomy. [Orthopedics. 2016; 39(6):381-386.]. Copyright 2016, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27482732     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20160729-01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  8 in total

Review 1.  Patellar complications following total knee arthroplasty: a review of the current literature.

Authors:  Angelos Assiotis; Kendrick To; Rhidian Morgan-Jones; Ioannis P Pengas; Wasim Khan
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-07-13

2.  Automatic detection of attachment sites for knee ligaments and tendons on CT images.

Authors:  Alexandra Yurova; Victoria Salamatova; Alexey Lychagin; Yuri Vassilevski
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  The tibial growth plate as a predictor of the original tibial plateau joint line as a reference for kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Katsuya Nagai; Yasuo Niki; Kengo Harato; Shu Kobayashi; Takeo Nagura; Takayuki Nakamura; Morio Matsumoto; Masaya Nakamura
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  A new method for evaluation of patellar height and the position of the joint line before and after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hua Han; Xiaohui Zhang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Does robotic technology successfully restore the joint line after total knee arthroplasty? A retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Varun O Agrawal; Anup P Gadekar; Narendra Vaidya
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2022-01-05

6.  Knee joint line related to bony landmarks of the knee: a radiologic study in a Thai population.

Authors:  S Tantavisut; C Amarase; S Ngarmukos; C Tanavalee; A Tanavalee
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2022-02-15

7.  Joint line reestablishment in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mustafa Çınar Akça; Yavuz Akalın; Nazan Çevik; İsmail Gökhan Şahin; Özgür Avcı; Alpaslan Öztürk
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-09-14

8.  Using anatomical landmarks to calculate the normal joint line position in Chinese people: an observational study.

Authors:  Aoyuan Fan; Tianyang Xu; Xifan Li; Lei Li; Lin Fan; Dong Yang; Guodong Li
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 2.359

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.