Literature DB >> 27481898

Health State Utilities and Disease Duration in Systemic Sclerosis: Is There an Association?

Adam J N Raymakers1, Nicole W Tsao1, Carlo A Marra1, Philip J Clements1, Dinesh Khanna2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Health state utility values (HSUV) are used as weightings to calculate quality-adjusted life years in economic evaluations. Evidence suggests that patients' perceptions of a new diagnosis for a chronic disease, while initially poor, may improve over time. The objective of this study was to examine the association between disease duration and direct HSUV scores in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc).
METHODS: Our study included patients with SSc from a US SSc center. An interviewer administered direct HSUV techniques including the visual analog scale (VAS), time tradeoff (TTO), and standard gamble (SG). We calculated the Short Form 6D HSUV from the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36. Additional clinical and demographic variables were collected.
RESULTS: The mean age of the SSc sample (n = 223) was 51 years (SD 16) with the majority being women (84%). Median disease duration was 5 years (interquartile range 1.5-9). Mean (SD) HSUV scores were 0.67 (0.19) for the VAS, 0.76 (0.28) for the TTO, 0.84 (0.22) for the SG, and 0.65 (0.13) for the SF-6D. In patients with early disease (defined as ≤ 2 yrs, n = 78), the mean HSUV values were 0.64 (VAS), 0.70 (TTO), 0.80 (SG), and 0.63 (SF-6D) versus for those with a longer disease duration: 0.69, 0.79, 0.87, and 0.67, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the SG measure showed a significant and positive association with disease duration measured as a continuous variable and using a threshold of 2 years (p = 0.047 and p = 0.023, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Greater disease duration showed a positive association with a direct measure (SG) of utility elicitation after a period of 2 years.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DISEASE DURATION; HEALTH STATE UTILITY VALUES; QUALITY OF LIFE; STANDARD GAMBLE; SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS; UTILITY SCORE

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27481898      PMCID: PMC5050095          DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.160162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  20 in total

1.  The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36.

Authors:  John Brazier; Jennifer Roberts; Mark Deverill
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 2.  Epidemiology of systemic sclerosis: incidence, prevalence, survival, risk factors, malignancy, and environmental triggers.

Authors:  Jammie Barnes; Maureen D Mayes
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.006

3.  A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Carlo A Marra; John C Woolcott; Jacek A Kopec; Kamran Shojania; Robert Offer; John E Brazier; John M Esdaile; Aslam H Anis
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 4.  Psychological effects of severe burn injuries.

Authors:  D R Patterson; J J Everett; C H Bombardier; K A Questad; V K Lee; J A Marvin
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  The dimensions of health outcomes: the health assessment questionnaire, disability and pain scales.

Authors:  J F Fries; P W Spitz; D Y Young
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1982 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.666

6.  Validation of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale relative to other instrumentation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  David Cella; Susan Yount; Mark Sorensen; Elliot Chartash; Nishan Sengupta; James Grober
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.666

7.  Health values of patients with systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Dinesh Khanna; Mansoor Ahmed; Daniel E Furst; Shaari S Ginsburg; Grace S Park; Richard Hornung; Joel Tsevat
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2007-02-15

8.  Not all "quality-adjusted life years" are equal.

Authors:  C A Marra; S A Marion; D P Guh; M Najafzadeh; F Wolfe; J M Esdaile; A E Clarke; M A Gignac; A H Anis
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 9.  Health-related quality of life--an introduction.

Authors:  Dinesh Khanna; Joel Tsevat
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.229

10.  What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? The case of the SF-6D.

Authors:  Stephen J Walters; John E Brazier
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  1 in total

1.  Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate an Internet-Based Self-Management Program in Systemic Sclerosis.

Authors:  Dinesh Khanna; Jennifer Serrano; Veronica J Berrocal; Richard M Silver; Pedro Cuencas; Sharon L Newbill; Josephine Battyany; Cynthia Maxwell; Mary Alore; Laura Dyas; Robert Riggs; Kerri Connolly; Saville Kellner; Jody J Fisher; Erica Bush; Anjali Sachdeva; Luke Evnin; Dennis W Raisch; Janet L Poole
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 4.794

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.