| Literature DB >> 27481877 |
Alfonso J Tafur1, Fadi E Shamoun2, Salma I Patel3, Denisse Tafur4, Fabiola Donna5, M Hassan Murad6.
Abstract
We summarize the evidence for the safety and efficacy of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) with and without ultrasound-assisted therapy for treating submassive and massive pulmonary embolism (PE) in a systematic review. The primary efficacy outcome was mortality. Outcomes were pooled across studies with the random-effects model. Twenty-four studies enrolled 700 patients in total; 653 received mechanical thromboembolectomy treatments for PE (mortality rate, 9% [95% confidence interval (CI), 6%-13%], P = .12; rate of minor complications, 6% [95% CI, 2%-13%]). In the ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis (USAT) studies, the mortality rate was 4% (95% CI, 1%-11%) and in the non-USAT studies, it was 9% (95% CI, 6%-13%). Secondary safety outcomes were all bleeding events, which occurred in 12% (95% CI, 7%-20%) of the USAT studies and in 10% (95% CI, 5%-20%) of the non-USAT studies. Current clinical evidence does not prove USAT is superior over CDT methods.Entities:
Keywords: catheter-directed thrombolysis; pulmonary embolism; thrombolysis
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27481877 DOI: 10.1177/1076029616661414
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Appl Thromb Hemost ISSN: 1076-0296 Impact factor: 2.389