Pär Stattin1, Fredrik Sandin2, Frederik Birkebæk Thomsen3, Hans Garmo4, David Robinson5, Ingela Franck Lissbrant6, Håkan Jonsson7, Ola Bratt8. 1. Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden. Electronic address: par.stattin@umu.se. 2. Regional Cancer Centre Uppsala Örebro, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden. 3. Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 4. Regional Cancer Centre Uppsala Örebro, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden; King's College London, School of Medicine, Division of Cancer Studies, Cancer Epidemiology Group, London, UK. 5. Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden; Department of Urology, Ryhov Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden. 6. Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. 7. Department of Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. 8. Department of Translational Medicine, Division of Urological Cancer, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; CamPARI Clinic, Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend androgen deprivation therapy only for men with very high-risk prostate cancer (PCa), but there is little evidence to support this stance. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between radical local treatment and mortality in men with very high-risk PCa. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Semiecologic study of men aged <80 yr within the Prostate Cancer data Base Sweden, diagnosed in 1998-2012 with very high-risk PCa (local clinical stage T4 and/or prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level 50-200ng/ml, any N, and M0). Men with locally advanced PCa (local clinical stage T3 and PSA level <50ng/ml, any N, and M0) were used as positive controls. INTERVENTION: Proportion of men who received prostatectomy or full-dose radiotherapy in 640 experimental units defined by county, diagnostic period, and age at diagnosis. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: PCa and all-cause mortality rate ratios (MRRs). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Both PCa and all-cause mortality were half as high in units in the highest tertile of exposure to radical local treatment compared with units in the lowest tertile (PCa MRR: 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.95; and all-cause MRR: 0.56; 95% CI, 0.33-0.92). The results observed for locally advanced PCa for highest versus lowest tertile of exposure were in agreement with results from randomized trials (PCa MRR: 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60-0.94; and all-cause MRR: 0.85; 95% CI, 0.72-1.00). Although the semiecologic design minimized selection bias on an individual level, the effect of high therapeutic activity could not be separated from that of high diagnostic activity. CONCLUSIONS: The substantially lower mortality in units with the highest exposure to radical local treatment suggests that radical treatment decreases mortality even in men with very high-risk PCa for whom such treatment has been considered ineffective. PATIENT SUMMARY: Men with very high-risk prostate cancer diagnosed and treated in units with the highest exposure to surgery or radiotherapy had a substantially lower mortality.
BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend androgen deprivation therapy only for men with very high-risk prostate cancer (PCa), but there is little evidence to support this stance. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between radical local treatment and mortality in men with very high-risk PCa. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Semiecologic study of men aged <80 yr within the Prostate Cancer data Base Sweden, diagnosed in 1998-2012 with very high-risk PCa (local clinical stage T4 and/or prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level 50-200ng/ml, any N, and M0). Men with locally advanced PCa (local clinical stage T3 and PSA level <50ng/ml, any N, and M0) were used as positive controls. INTERVENTION: Proportion of men who received prostatectomy or full-dose radiotherapy in 640 experimental units defined by county, diagnostic period, and age at diagnosis. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: PCa and all-cause mortality rate ratios (MRRs). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Both PCa and all-cause mortality were half as high in units in the highest tertile of exposure to radical local treatment compared with units in the lowest tertile (PCa MRR: 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.95; and all-cause MRR: 0.56; 95% CI, 0.33-0.92). The results observed for locally advanced PCa for highest versus lowest tertile of exposure were in agreement with results from randomized trials (PCa MRR: 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60-0.94; and all-cause MRR: 0.85; 95% CI, 0.72-1.00). Although the semiecologic design minimized selection bias on an individual level, the effect of high therapeutic activity could not be separated from that of high diagnostic activity. CONCLUSIONS: The substantially lower mortality in units with the highest exposure to radical local treatment suggests that radical treatment decreases mortality even in men with very high-risk PCa for whom such treatment has been considered ineffective. PATIENT SUMMARY:Men with very high-risk prostate cancer diagnosed and treated in units with the highest exposure to surgery or radiotherapy had a substantially lower mortality.
Authors: Jae Won Park; Dong Hoon Koh; Won Sik Jang; Joo Yong Lee; Kang Su Cho; Won Sik Ham; Koon Ho Rha; Woo Hee Jung; Sung Joon Hong; Young Deuk Choi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-06-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Frederik B Thomsen; Marcus Westerberg; Hans Garmo; David Robinson; Lars Holmberg; Hans David Ulmert; Pär Stattin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-01-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Magdalena Lycken; Oskar Bergengren; Linda Drevin; Hans Garmo; Marcus Westerberg; Elin Axén; Johan Stranne; Lars Holmberg; Anna Bill-Axelson Journal: Eur Urol Open Sci Date: 2022-05-28