Literature DB >> 27480915

Adsorption kinetics and isotherms of arsenite and arsenate on hematite nanoparticles and aggregates.

Dionne Dickson1, Guangliang Liu2, Yong Cai3.   

Abstract

Iron (Fe) nanoparticles, e.g., zerovalent iron (ZVI) and iron oxide nanoparticles (IONP), have been used for remediation and environmental management of arsenic (As) contamination. These Fe nanoparticles, although originally nanosized, tend to form aggregates, in particular in the environment. The interactions of As with both nanoparticles and micron-sized aggregates should be considered when these Fe nanomaterials are used for mitigation of As issue. The objective of this study was to compare the adsorption kinetics and isotherm of arsenite (As(III)) and arsenate (As(V)) on bare hematite nanoparticles and aggregates and how this affects the fate of arsenic in the environment. The adsorption kinetic process was investigated with regards to the aggregation of the nanoparticles and the type of sorbed species. Kinetic data were best described by a pseudo second-order model. Both As species had similar rate constants, ranging from 3.82 to 6.45 × 10-4 g/(μg·h), as rapid adsorption occurred within the first 8 h regardless of particle size. However, hematite nanoparticles and aggregates showed a higher affinity to adsorb larger amounts of As(V) (4122 ± 62.79 μg/g) than As(III) (2899 ± 71.09 μg/g) at equilibrium. We were able to show that aggregation and sedimentation of hematite nanoparticles occurs during the adsorption process and this might cause the immobilization and reduced bioavailability of arsenic. Isotherm studies were described by the Freundlich model and it confirmed that hematite nanoparticles have a significantly higher adsorption capacity for both As(V) and As(III) than hematite aggregates. This information is useful and can assist in predicting arsenic adsorption behavior and assessing the role of iron oxide nanoparticles in the biogeochemical cycling of arsenic.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adsorption; Arsenate; Arsenite; Hematite aggregates; Iron oxide nanoparticles

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27480915     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  5 in total

1.  Purification of arsenic-contaminated water with K-jarosite filters.

Authors:  Rodrigo C Hott; Luiz F O Maia; Mayra S Santos; Márcia C Faria; Luiz C A Oliveira; Márcio C Pereira; Cleide A Bomfeti; Jairo L Rodrigues
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Characterizing Preferential Adsorption of Phosphate on Binary Sorbents of Goethite and Maghaemite using in situ ATR-FTIR and 2D Correlation Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Junho Han; Hee-Myong Ro
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Sorption of Monothioarsenate to the Natural Sediments and Its Competition with Arsenite and Arsenate.

Authors:  Huimei Shan; Jinxian Zhang; Sanxi Peng; Hongbin Zhan; Danxue Liao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Sustainable Low-Concentration Arsenite [As(III)] Removal in Single and Multicomponent Systems Using Hybrid Iron Oxide-Biochar Nanocomposite Adsorbents-A Mechanistic Study.

Authors:  Prachi Singh; Ankur Sarswat; Charles U Pittman; Todd Mlsna; Dinesh Mohan
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2020-02-06

Review 5.  Recent Progress on Nanomaterial-Based Membranes for Water Treatment.

Authors:  Majeda Khraisheh; Salma Elhenawy; Fares AlMomani; Mohammad Al-Ghouti; Mohammad K Hassan; Bassim H Hameed
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.