Literature DB >> 27480890

[Telemedicine in the ICU - the possibilities and limitations of an innovation].

R Deisz1, G Marx2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intensive care medicine is challenged by demographic changes and an increasing number of patient combined with existing shortage of doctors. Telemedicine is a promising approach to ensure patient care in the coming years. Due to a shortage of intensive care physicians in the USA, comprehensive telemedicine coverage has already been established. To date, 11 % of all hospitals are supported by a telemedicine center. The beneficial impact in terms of quality of care, patient safety and economic factors has been confirmed in numerous multicenter studies.
RESULTS: In the largest multicenter study by Lilly et al., including 107,432 critically ill patients in the intervention group, telemedicine interventions led to a reduced ICU and hospital mortality. In addition, tele-consulting significantly reduced the ICU- and hospital length of stay. These findings were further supported by following studies and metaanalysis, which confirmed these results. The incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia and catheter-associated infections was significantly reduced, when compared to the preintervention group. Furthermore, patient safety and treatment outcomes were improved by increased guideline adherence. Last, the telemedicine intervention significantly decreased the overall treatment costs. These positive results were reproducible even in larger and academic hospitals. At the same time it should be pointed out that a transfer to other health care systems should be considered cautiously in the context of different local infrastructure and culture. Finally, it has to be investigated to what extent the results can be transferred to the health-care situation in Germany.
CONCLUSION: Previous data demonstrated that telemedical support can improve the outcome in critically ill patients, both during hospitalization as well as in the long-term result until the discharge home. Telemedicine is neither a magic bullet nor a replacement for a physician. Instead it is a new type of medical cooperation to further improve the outcomes of critically ill patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Benefit assessment; Data protection; Demographic change; Medical cooperation; Quality improvement; Telemedicine in ICU’s

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27480890     DOI: 10.1007/s00063-016-0204-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed        ISSN: 2193-6218            Impact factor:   0.840


  24 in total

1.  Association of health information technology and teleintensivist coverage with decreased mortality and ventilator use in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Matthew McCambridge; Kari Jones; Hannah Paxton; Kathy Baker; Elliot J Sussman; Jeff Etchason
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-04-12

2.  A multicenter population-based effectiveness study of teleintensive care unit-directed ventilator rounds demonstrating improved adherence to a protective lung strategy, decreased ventilator duration, and decreased intensive care unit mortality.

Authors:  Thomas Kalb; Jayashree Raikhelkar; Shelley Meyer; Francis Ntimba; Jason Thuli; Mary Jo Gorman; Isabelle Kopec; Corey Scurlock
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.425

Review 3.  Staff acceptance of tele-ICU coverage: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lance Brendan Young; Paul S Chan; Peter Cram
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Improving response to critical laboratory results with automation: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  G J Kuperman; J M Teich; M J Tanasijevic; N Ma'Luf; E Rittenberg; A Jha; J Fiskio; J Winkelman; D W Bates
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Interhospital Transfer Delays Appropriate Treatment for Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Brett A Faine; Joseph M Noack; Terrance Wong; Jeffrey T Messerly; Azeemuddin Ahmed; Brian M Fuller; Nicholas M Mohr
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 6.  Critical care telemedicine: evolution and state of the art.

Authors:  Craig M Lilly; Marc T Zubrow; Kenneth M Kempner; H Neal Reynolds; Sanjay Subramanian; Evert A Eriksson; Crystal L Jenkins; Teresa A Rincon; Benjamin A Kohl; Robert H Groves; Elizabeth R Cowboy; Kamana E Mbekeani; Mark J McDonald; Dominick A Rascona; Michael H Ries; Herbert J Rogove; Ahmed E Badr; Isabelle C Kopec
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Intensive care unit telemedicine: review and consensus recommendations.

Authors:  Joseph Cummings; Cathleen Krsek; Kathy Vermoch; Karl Matuszewski
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.852

8.  Association of telemedicine for remote monitoring of intensive care patients with mortality, complications, and length of stay.

Authors:  Eric J Thomas; Joseph F Lucke; Laura Wueste; Lisa Weavind; Bela Patel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  The effect of telemedicine in critically ill patients: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Elizabeth Wilcox; Neill K J Adhikari
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Telemedicine intervention improves ICU outcomes.

Authors:  Farid Sadaka; Ashok Palagiri; Steven Trottier; Wendy Deibert; Donna Gudmestad; Steven E Sommer; Christopher Veremakis
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2013-01-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.