Rafael Amorim Cavalcanti de Siqueira1, Flávia Noemy Gasparini Kiatake Fontão2, Ivete Aparecida de Mattias Sartori3, Paulo Gustavo Freitas Santos4, Sérgio Rocha Bernardes3, Rodrigo Tiossi5. 1. Department of Prosthodontics, Faculdade Integrada de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. 2. Department of Radiology, Latin American Institute for Dental Research and Education (ILAPEO), Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil. 3. Department of Prosthodontics, Latin American Institute for Dental Research and Education (ILAPEO), Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil. 4. Private Practitioner, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. 5. Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, State University of Londrina, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This randomized clinical trial analyzed crestal bone changes and soft tissue dimensions surrounding implants with an internal tapered connection placed in the mandible anterior region at different depths (equicrestal and subcrestal). MATERIALS AND METHODS:Eleven edentulous patients (five implants per patient) were randomly divided in a split-mouth design: G1, 28 equicrestal implants; and G2, 27 subcrestal implants. All implants were immediately loaded. Correlation between keratinized tissue width (KTW) and vertical mucosa thickness (MT) with soft tissue recession was analyzed. Intraoral radiographs were used to evaluate crestal bone changes. Patients were assessed immediately, 4-, and 8-months after implant placement. Rank-based ANOVA-type statistical test was used for comparison between groups (α = 0.05). RESULTS:Fifty-five implants (G1 = 28 and G2 = 27) were assessed in 11 patients. Implant survival rate was 100% for both groups. Both tested implant placement depths presented similar crestal bone loss (P > 0.05). Significant crestal bone loss for each group was found in the different measurement times (T4 and T8) (P < 0.05). Implant placement depths, KTW, and vertical MT had no effect on soft tissue recession (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Different implant placement depths do not influence crestal bone changes. Soft tissue behavior is not influenced by different implant placement depths or by the amount of keratinized tissue.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: This randomized clinical trial analyzed crestal bone changes and soft tissue dimensions surrounding implants with an internal tapered connection placed in the mandible anterior region at different depths (equicrestal and subcrestal). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven edentulouspatients (five implants per patient) were randomly divided in a split-mouth design: G1, 28 equicrestal implants; and G2, 27 subcrestal implants. All implants were immediately loaded. Correlation between keratinized tissue width (KTW) and vertical mucosa thickness (MT) with soft tissue recession was analyzed. Intraoral radiographs were used to evaluate crestal bone changes. Patients were assessed immediately, 4-, and 8-months after implant placement. Rank-based ANOVA-type statistical test was used for comparison between groups (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Fifty-five implants (G1 = 28 and G2 = 27) were assessed in 11 patients. Implant survival rate was 100% for both groups. Both tested implant placement depths presented similar crestal bone loss (P > 0.05). Significant crestal bone loss for each group was found in the different measurement times (T4 and T8) (P < 0.05). Implant placement depths, KTW, and vertical MT had no effect on soft tissue recession (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Different implant placement depths do not influence crestal bone changes. Soft tissue behavior is not influenced by different implant placement depths or by the amount of keratinized tissue.
Authors: Matteo Albertini; Federico Herrero-Climent; Carmen María Díaz-Castro; Jose Nart; Ana Fernández-Palacín; José Vicente Ríos-Santos; Mariano Herrero-Climent Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-01-29 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Vaclav Babuska; Jan Palan; Jana Kolaja Dobra; Vlastimil Kulda; Michal Duchek; Jan Cerny; Daniel Hrusak Journal: Materials (Basel) Date: 2018-09-26 Impact factor: 3.623
Authors: H Pellicer-Chover; M Díaz-Sanchez; D Soto-Peñaloza; M-A Peñarrocha-Diago; L Canullo; D Peñarrocha-Oltra Journal: Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Date: 2019-09-01
Authors: Davide Farronato; Pietro Mario Pasini; Andrea Alain Orsina; Mattia Manfredini; Lorenzo Azzi; Marco Farronato Journal: Materials (Basel) Date: 2020-01-21 Impact factor: 3.623
Authors: Saverio Cosola; Simone Marconcini; Michela Boccuzzi; Giovanni Battista Menchini Fabris; Ugo Covani; Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago; David Peñarrocha-Oltra Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-09-22 Impact factor: 3.390