| Literature DB >> 27480346 |
Vighter Iberi1,2,3, Liangbo Liang1, Anton V Ievlev1,4, Michael G Stanford1,2, Ming-Wei Lin1, Xufan Li1, Masoud Mahjouri-Samani1, Stephen Jesse1,4, Bobby G Sumpter1,4,5, Sergei V Kalinin1,4, David C Joy1,2, Kai Xiao1, Alex Belianinov1,3, Olga S Ovchinnikova1,4.
Abstract
Development of devices and structures based on the layered 2D materials critically hinges on the capability to induce, control, and tailor the electronic, transport, and optoelectronic properties via defect engineering, much like doping strategies have enabled semiconductor electronics and forging enabled introduction the of iron age. Here, we demonstrate the use of a scanning helium ion microscope (HIM) for tailoring the functionality of single layer MoSe2 locally, and decipher associated mechanisms at the atomic level. We demonstrate He(+) beam bombardment that locally creates vacancies, shifts the Fermi energy landscape and increases the Young's modulus of elasticity. Furthermore, we observe for the first time, an increase in the B-exciton photoluminescence signal from the nanoforged regions at the room temperature. The approach for precise defect engineering demonstrated here opens opportunities for creating functional 2D optoelectronic devices with a wide range of customizable properties that include operating in the visible region.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27480346 PMCID: PMC4969618 DOI: 10.1038/srep30481
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) AFM topography image of single layer supported MoSe2 flake and (b) its height profile as labeled on (a). (c–e) Atomic resolution MAADF-STEM images of (c) pristine region, (d) irradiated region at 1 × 1015 He+/cm2, and (e) 1 × 1016 He+/cm2. (f,g) k-means clustering STEM images in (c,d) color corresponds to the number of cluster. (h) Profile of pristine MoSe2 (c).
Figure 2Calculated electronic band structures of single layer MoSe2 with different Se vacancy concentrations.
All band energies are aligned to the vacuum potential for direct comparison. The vacancy induced in-gap bands are highlighted in red color. The Fermi level is set at the middle of the band gap for each system, as shown by the blue dash line.
Figure 3Tapping mode band excitation (BE) Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) of supported MoSe2.
(a–c) Local contact potential difference (LCPD) and (d–f) capacitance gradient maps of regions irradiated by He+ beam with different doses: (a,d) 1 × 1014 ions/cm2 (b,e) 1 × 1015 ions/cm2 and (c,f) 1 × 1016 ions/cm2.
Figure 4Photoluminescence (PL) spectra of supported MoSe2 indicating the evolution of the A-exciton (~1.55 eV) and B-exciton (~1.77 eV) peaks in undosed region (green trace) and He+ beam-irradiated regions corresponding to doses of 1 × 1014 ions/cm2 (blue trace), 1 × 1015 ions/cm2 (purple trace), and 1 × 1016 ions/cm2 (red trace).
Figure 5Nanomechanical measurements of supported MoSe2 using contact resonance band excitation (BE) scanning probe microscopy.
(a) Storage modulus maps of supported MoSe2 irradiated with 1 × 1014 ions/cm2 He+ beam dose; (b) Storage modulus maps of supported MoSe2 irradiated with 1 × 1015 ions/cm2 He+ beam dose. (c) Young’s modulus of elasticity curves corresponding to He+ beam doses of 1 × 1014 ions/cm2 (blue trace) and 1 × 1014 ions/cm2 (red trace). (d) Calculated Young’s modulus of single layer MoSe2 with different Se vacancy concentrations. For each vacancy concentration, two scenarios are considered: lattice constants fixed to the original ones (squares) and lattice constants re-optimized (triangles). After re-optimization, the system size is slightly reduced, suggesting vacancy-induced compression.