Literature DB >> 27480312

Collaborative Patient-Centered Quality Improvement: A Cross-Sectional Survey Comparing the Types and Numbers of Quality Initiatives Selected by Patients and Health Professionals.

Elizabeth A Fradgley1,2, Christine L Paul3,2, Jamie Bryant3,2, Nicolas Collins4, Stephen P Ackland2,5, Douglas Bellamy6, Christopher R Levi7.   

Abstract

Identification of patients' and health professionals' quality improvement preferences is an essential first step in collaborative improvement models. This includes experience-based codesign (EBCD), where service change is strategically introduced following stakeholder consultation. This study compared the number and types of improvement initiatives selected by outpatients and health professionals. Using electronic surveys designed to inform EBCD studies, 541 outpatients (71.1% consent) and 124 professionals (47.1% response) selected up to 23 general initiatives. On average, outpatients selected 2.4 (median = 1, interquartile range = 1-3) initiatives and professionals selected 10.7 (median = 10; interquartile range = 6-15) initiatives. Outpatients demonstrated a strong preference for improvements to clinic organization, such as appointment scheduling and clinic contact. Outpatients selected relatively fewer initiatives potentially reducing the complexity of service change and resources required to address preferences. Comparatively, professionals indicated a greater degree of change is needed and selected initiatives related to communication with patients and other professionals, including coordinating multidisciplinary care. Improvements to information provision were commonly selected by both groups and offered a strategic opportunity to address patients' and professionals' preferences. By quantifying the ways in which preferences differed, this study emphasizes the need for collaborative approaches to health service change and may be used to initiate an informed discussion on patients' and professionals' quality improvement preferences in tertiary care.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ambulatory care; consumer participation; experience-based design; health-care surveys; patient-centered care; quality improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27480312     DOI: 10.1177/0163278716659524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Health Prof        ISSN: 0163-2787            Impact factor:   2.651


  3 in total

1.  When patients (and families) raise the alarm: Patient and family activated rapid response as a safety strategy for hospitals.

Authors:  Tracey Bucknall; Rett Quinney; Lisa Booth; Aidín McKinney; Christian P Subbe; Mandy Odell
Journal:  Future Healthc J       Date:  2021-11

Review 2.  Reframing Patient Experience Approaches and Methods to Achieve Patient-Centeredness in Healthcare: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Eun-Jeong Kim; Inn-Chul Nam; Yoo-Ri Koo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  An Interprofessional Team-Based Intervention to Address Barriers to Initiating Palliative Care in Pediatric Oncology: A Multiple-Method Evaluation of Feasibility, Acceptability, and Impact.

Authors:  Jennifer K Walter; Douglas L Hill; Theodore E Schall; Julia E Szymczak; Shefali Parikh; Connie DiDomenico; Karen W Carroll; Russell T Nye; Chris Feudtner
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 3.612

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.