Literature DB >> 27479832

The Use of MRI in Evaluating Knee Pain in Patients Aged 40 Years and Older.

Muyibat A Adelani1, Nathan A Mall, Robert H Brophy, Mark E Halstead, Matthew V Smith, Rick W Wright.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The use of MRI is increasing when evaluating patients with knee pain because it is highly sensitive for detecting intra-articular pathology. However, such changes can be associated with degenerative joint disease, which may be demonstrated with weight-bearing radiographs. The purpose of this study was to determine how often MRI was obtained before orthopaedic referral in patients aged ≥40 years with knee pain, how often weight-bearing radiographs were obtained before MRI, and whether such imaging influenced treatment recommendations.
METHODS: In a study of 599 new patients, participating physicians documented the presence of a prereferral MRI and/or plain radiographic studies, the results of weight-bearing radiographs, treatment recommendations, and the impact of any prereferral imaging.
RESULTS: Prereferral use of MRI occurred in 130 patients (22%). Of these patients, plain radiographic studies were obtained for 58% before MRI and 13% had weight-bearing radiographs. Ultimately, 17% had weight-bearing radiographs that demonstrated >50% loss of joint space. Forty-eight percent of prereferral MRIs did not contribute to treatment recommendations. In patients with >50% loss of joint space, MRI was considered unnecessary in 95% of the cases. DISCUSSION: Many prereferral MRIs do not contribute to clinical decision making. Weight-bearing radiographs can help identify those patients in whom MRI is unlikely to be helpful. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27479832     DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1067-151X            Impact factor:   3.020


  6 in total

1.  Value-based Healthcare: The Challenge of Identifying and Addressing Low-value Interventions.

Authors:  Michael G Zywiel; Tiffany C Liu; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The patient results and satisfaction of knee arthroplasty in a validated grading system.

Authors:  Christiaan Rudolf Oosthuizen; Catherine Van Der Straeten; Innocent Maposa; Christian Hugo Snyckers; Duwayne Peter Vermaak; Sebastian Magobotha
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Patients Older Than 40 Years With Unilateral Occupational Claims for New Shoulder and Knee Symptoms Have Bilateral MRI Changes.

Authors:  Tiffany C Liu; Nina Leung; Leonard Edwards; David Ring; Edward Bernacki; Melissa D Tonn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Position Statement of the Arthroscopy Association of Canada (AAC) Concerning Arthroscopy of the Knee Joint-September 2017.

Authors:  Ivan Wong; Laurie Hiemstra; Olufemi R Ayeni; Alan Getgood; Cole Beavis; Monika Volesky; Ross Outerbridge; Brendan Sheehan; Robert McCormack; Robert Litchfield; Daniel Whelan; Nicholas Mohtadi; Catherine Coady; Peter B MacDonald
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-02-26

5.  The rate of unnecessary interventions for the management of knee osteoarthritis: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Jacquelyn D Marsh; Ryan Degen; Trevor B Birmingham; J Robert Giffin; Alan Getgood; Robert Litchfield; Kevin Willits; J Andrew McClure; Blayne Welk
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 6.  Characterizing and quantifying low-value diagnostic imaging internationally: a scoping review.

Authors:  Elin Kjelle; Eivind Richter Andersen; Arne Magnus Krokeide; Lesley J J Soril; Leti van Bodegom-Vos; Fiona M Clement; Bjørn Morten Hofmann
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.795

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.