Literature DB >> 27479805

B1 Field Correction of T1 Estimation Should Be Considered for Breast Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging Even at 1.5 T.

Wan-Chen Tsai1, Kuo-Jang Kao1, Kai-Ming Chang1, Chen-Fang Hung1, Qing Yang1, Chien-Yuan E Lin1, Chii-Ming Chen1.   

Abstract

Purpose To prospectively quantify the effect of T1 estimation in fat by B1 correction in breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 1.5 T and to examine the subsequent quantitative dynamic contrast material-enhanced parameters in breast cancer with and without B1 correction. Materials and Methods This study had institutional review board approval, and informed consent was obtained from 72 patients with breast cancer before breast MR imaging studies were performed between January and July 2015. B1+ field and variable flip angle (FA) mapping were included in the dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging protocol with a 1.5-T MR imaging system. Precontrast T1 relaxation in fat and breast tumors was computed with and without B1 correction. The pharmacokinetic parameters of breast cancer were calculated by using the Tofts model with T1 values before and after B1 correction. The Mann-Whitney U test and linear regression model were used for statistical analysis. Results The FA was 19% higher in the left breast and 3% lower in the right breast than the prescribed value. This 22% average FA difference created a 43% T1 estimation bias in fat between the breasts. The T1 variation in fat was reduced to 0.96% after B1 correction. There was a 50% overestimation and a 7% underestimation of tumor T1 in the left breast and the right, respectively, associated with B1 error. Assuming T1 after B1 correction represents the true tumor T1, 41% underestimation in the left breast and 10% overestimation in the right without B1 correction were seen in the dynamic contrast-enhanced parameters (including the volume transfer constant, or Ktrans, fraction of extracellular extravascular space, or ve, and blood normalized initial area under the gadolinium concentration curve to 90 seconds, or IAUGCBN90). Conclusion B1 correction for more accurate T1 values should be considered for quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging, even at 1.5 T, to offset significant systemic error. © RSNA, 2016.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27479805     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016160062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  7 in total

1.  Variations in native T1 values in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy with and without late gadolinium enhancement.

Authors:  Sean M Lang; Tarek Alsaied; Philip R Khoury; Thomas D Ryan; Michael D Taylor
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-09-20       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Estimating B1+ in the breast at 7 T using a generic template.

Authors:  Michael J van Rijssel; Josien P W Pluim; Peter R Luijten; Kenneth G A Gilhuijs; Alexander J E Raaijmakers; Dennis W J Klomp
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  Harmonization of Quantitative Parenchymal Enhancement in T1 -Weighted Breast MRI.

Authors:  Bas H M van der Velden; Michael J van Rijssel; Beatrice Lena; Marielle E P Philippens; Claudette E Loo; Max A A Ragusi; Sjoerd G Elias; Elizabeth J Sutton; Elizabeth A Morris; Lambertus W Bartels; Kenneth G A Gilhuijs
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Multi-site, multi-platform comparison of MRI T1 measurement using the system phantom.

Authors:  Kathryn E Keenan; Zydrunas Gimbutas; Andrew Dienstfrey; Karl F Stupic; Michael A Boss; Stephen E Russek; Thomas L Chenevert; P V Prasad; Junyu Guo; Wilburn E Reddick; Kim M Cecil; Amita Shukla-Dave; David Aramburu Nunez; Amaresh Shridhar Konar; Michael Z Liu; Sachin R Jambawalikar; Lawrence H Schwartz; Jie Zheng; Peng Hu; Edward F Jackson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion to Identify Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer with Different Vascular Normalization Gene Expression.

Authors:  Wan Chen Tsai; Kai Ming Chang; Kuo Jang Kao
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  Correcting time-intensity curves in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI for inhomogeneous excitation fields at 7T.

Authors:  Michael J van Rijssel; Josien P W Pluim; Hui-Shan M Chan; Lieke van den Wildenberg; Alexander M Th Schmitz; Peter R Luijten; Kenneth G A Gilhuijs; Dennis W J Klomp
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Use of Multiple-Tube Phantom: A Method to Globally Correct Native T1 Relaxation Time Inhomogeneity in Dedicated Molecular Magnetic Resonance Breast Coil.

Authors:  Pradeep Singh Negi; Shashi Bhushan Mehta; Amarnath Jena
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2021-05-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.