Literature DB >> 27479736

Risk of Subluxation or Dislocation After Operative Treatment of Terrible Triad Injuries.

Dafang Zhang1, Matthew Tarabochia, Stein Janssen, David Ring, Neal Chen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The management of terrible triad injuries has evolved over the last 2 decades to include routine radial head fixation or replacement, reattachment of the lateral collateral ligament, with or without coronoid fixation. Our objective was to determine the likelihood of and factors associated with subluxation or dislocation after operative treatment of terrible triad injuries among a large group of surgeons using current techniques.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Two level I trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 107 patients with operatively treated terrible triad injuries from January 2000 to June 2015. INTERVENTION: Review of patient- and surgery-related factors during the first postoperative month. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Radiographic subluxation of the ulnohumeral joint.
RESULTS: One hundred of the 107 patients (93%) treated with open fixation of terrible triad injuries had no radiographic subluxation or redislocation. Two patients (2%) had slight transient radiographic subluxation ("drop sign") that corrected with active exercises within weeks of surgery. Five patients (5%) had persistent radiographic subluxation, 3 treated with a second surgery (3%). When treated within 2 weeks of injury, recurrent subluxation or dislocation after operative fixation of terrible triad injuries was rare (1%), provided that the radial head was replaced and the lateral collateral ligament reattached.
CONCLUSIONS: Radiographic subluxation is very uncommon with current operative management of terrible triad injuries of the elbow within 2 weeks. Patients treated more than 2 weeks after injury might benefit from ancillary fixation to limit subluxation (ie, cross pinning, external fixation, or internal joint stabilizer). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27479736     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  6 in total

Review 1.  Post-traumatic elbow stiffness: Pathogenesis and current treatments.

Authors:  Dafang Zhang; Ara Nazarian; Edward K Rodriguez
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-08-08

2.  What Factors Are Associated with Reoperation After Operative Treatment of Terrible Triad Injuries?

Authors:  Peter J Ostergaard; Matthew A Tarabochia; Matthew J Hall; George Dyer; Brandon E Earp; Philip Blazar; Dafang Zhang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Prediction and Potential Preventions for the Development of Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis after the Terrible Triad Injury: A Multicenter Risk Factors Study.

Authors:  Jingjing Li; Di Lu; Wenxiao Lin; Qinglong Li; Jing Hu; Ding Xu; Youming Zhao; Weijun Guo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-06-21       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Surgical treatment for terrible triad injury of the elbow with anteromedial coronoid fracture through a combined surgical approach.

Authors:  Guanyi Liu; Jingen Hu; Weihu Ma; Ming Li; Rongming Xu; Zhijun Pan
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 1.671

5.  Posterior (Boyd) approach to terrible triad injuries.

Authors:  Patrick J Carroll; David I Morrissey
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-12-23

6.  Risk factors of efficacy for patients receiving surgical treatment following terrible triad of the elbow joint: A comparative study.

Authors:  Hong-Wei Chen; Shu-Ming Huang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.889

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.