Literature DB >> 27479595

The ACA's Zero Cost-Sharing Mandate and Trends in Out-of-Pocket Expenditures on Well-Child and Screening Mammography Visits.

James B Kirby1, Amy J Davidoff, Jayasree Basu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Starting in September of 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act required most health insurance policies to cover evidence-based preventive care with no cost-sharing (no copays, coinsurance, or deductibles). It is unknown, however, whether declines in out-of-pocket costs for preventive services are large enough to prompt increases in utilization, the ultimate goal of the policy.
METHODS: In this study, we use a nationally representative sample of ambulatory care visits to estimate the impact of the zero cost-sharing mandate on out-of-pocket expenditures on well-child and screening mammography visits. Estimates are made using 2-part interrupted time-series models, with well-woman visits serving as the control group because they were not covered under the zero cost-sharing mandate until after our study period.
RESULTS: Results indicate a substantial reduction in out-of-pocket costs attributable to the Affordable Care Act. Between January 2011 and September 2012, the zero cost-sharing mandate reduced per-visit out-of-pocket costs for well-child visits from $18.46 to $8.08 (56%) and out-of-pocket costs for screening mammography visits from $25.43 to $6.50 (74%). No reduction was apparent for well-woman visits.
CONCLUSIONS: The Affordable Care Act's zero cost-sharing mandate for preventive care has had a large impact on out-of-pocket expenditures for well-child and mammography visits. To increase preventive service use, research is needed to better understand barriers to obtaining preventive care that are not directly related to cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27479595     DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  5 in total

1.  Prevalence of Out-Of-Pocket Payments for Mammography Screening Among Recently Screened Women.

Authors:  Susan A Sabatino; Trevor D Thompson; Jacqueline W Miller; Nancy Breen; Mary C White; Erica Breslau; Meredith L Shoemaker
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  The role of plan choice in health care utilization of high-deductible plan enrollees.

Authors:  Salam Abdus
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-10-27       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Trends in Well-Child Visits With Out-of-Pocket Costs in the US Before and After the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  Paul R Shafer; Alex Hoagland; Heather E Hsu
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-03-01

4.  Sociodemographic and hospital-based predictors of intense end-of-life care among children, adolescents, and young adults with hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  Sophia Mun; Rong Wang; Xiaomei Ma; Prasanna Ananth
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 6.921

5.  Cost-Sharing and Out-of-Pocket Cost for Women Who Received MRI for Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  I-Wen Pan; Kevin C Oeffinger; Ya-Chen Tina Shih
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 11.816

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.